They’re Both Laughingstocks
March, 26, 2008 — nicedeb
On the one hand you’ve got Obama, a guy who’s attended an egregious race-baiting church for nearly 20 years, lead by his “spiritual mentor”, the hateful and ridiculous Reverend Jeremiah Wright. He compares his white grandmother’s fear of black (Panhandling?) men on the street with his spiritual guide’s hateful, racist demagoguery, which infects thousands every Sunday. He has many known associations with Marxists and radicals. How far to the left is he? Let the Astute Bloggers draw a picture for you. Yet somehow, he tries to paint himself as a post racial uniter.
-
On the other hand we’ve got Hillary, someone who couldn’t tell the truth to save her life. It’s getting to the point where if Hillary is telling a story from her past, we should all safely assume she’s bullshitting. Here’s Dick Morris’s list of Hillary’s lies. It’s pretty extensive. If she can’t be trusted to tell the truth on trivial matters, how can she be trusted to tell the truth on the really important ones; matters of national security, for instance?
They’re both far left libs, of course…which isn’t funny. But a humorous by-product of what Rush Limbaugh calls the “How can I fool them today” mentality of liberals, is the fact that more and more…because of the alternative media, or (in Hillary’s case) MSM bias in favor of one candidate over another, they get caught in their lies, and deceits. Which is making for a verrrry entertaining Democrat primary season.
The consequences of the embarrassing revelations, and increasing acrimony between the candidates are showing up in many polls. For instance, according to Rasmussen, 22% of Democrats want Clinton to withdraw from the race. An equal number want Obama to withdraw. Gallup reports that significant numbers from both camps would defect and vote for McCain if their candidate loses the primary.
I know it’s still early, but none of this bodes well for the Democrats’ White House aspirations.

UPDATE:
Gateway Pundit has Hillary’s plan to steal the nomination at the Democratic Convention, as revealed on On The Record With Greta Van Susteren:
HILLARY: But, Michigan is the clearest example of getting right up to the brink of doing the right thing and having Senator Obama say no I won’t do it.
GRETA: And, if he says, “No I won’t do it,” that leaves Michigan and Florida out and does that leave you out?
HILLARY: No, not at all. We’re going to make those votes count one way or another.
(That part gave me chills)!
GRETA: How?
HILLARY: Well, you know, you can always go to the (DNC) convention… That’s what credential fights are for. Let’s… Let’s have the Democratic party go on record against seating the Michigan and Florida delegations three months before the general election? I don’t think that will happen. I think they will be seated. So that’s where we’re heading if we don’t get this worked out.”
Rich Lowry, in speaking of Hillary’s latest whopper, nails the fix Democrats are in:
This method (of constantly lying) served the Clintons well during eight years in the White House, when Democrats exalted them for winning by any means fair or foul. But now that the Clintons’ dark arts of spin and remorseless ambition are being turned on their fellow partisans, Democrats seem stunned - like the tiger handler who can’t believe his big cat turned on him.
Dante couldn’t have devised a more appropriate ring of hell as punishment for the party than spending a few more months with the Clintons in a dispiriting slog of a nomination battle.
Muahahahaha.
Beautiful.
ONE MORE:
Ann Coulter on Hillary’s “Swiftboating”. Only she’s not really being swiftboated because she’s the de facto Republican in this race, so she’s what the media considers, “guilty”.





March, 26, 2008 at 1:13 pm
I think the Dems planned on losing this election from the get-go. If they actually got the White House, they’d finally have to do something besides bitch. No more Republican boogey man to point their fingers at.
How else to explain the totally ridiculous running of two candidates that are absolutely un-electable.
Either one will be smashed by the weakest “Republican” we got.
Actually, I think Republicans wanted to lose this election too, but the Dems out-lost them.
March, 26, 2008 at 5:56 pm
Obama and Hillary each have their share of MSM cheerleaders, and it’s fun watching the two sides fact-check each other. All McCain has to do is stay out of the way and watch.
The sad part is that so many American voters simply choose to ignore or even actively excuse the various Obama/Hillary shortcomings (very charitable word, that), as though it’s all just some sort of VRWC™.
March, 26, 2008 at 6:09 pm
…the Dems out-lost them.
Heh. There are elements of truth to this idea, for sure.
I come pretty close to loathing McCain. That being said, his near-certain victory (IMHO) over the two demo-doofii in this race and the continuing antics of the Lib pols and extremist “believers” makes for some pretty amusing news stories.
Hillary has AlGore Disease - an uncontrollable urge to bullshit extemporaneously - and badly. Obama has the disadvantage of his blatant racist and socialist mindset. And he has an added bonus: his wife’s mouth. His wife’s mouth is probably worth 5 percentage points - to the opposing candidate.
March, 27, 2008 at 2:22 am
McGoo, hang out with me a while. Drink the McCain Kool-Aid; it’s nice and tasty, I promise.
Besides, the stars are all aligned in his favor. Right guy, right time, everything. You can’t fight it!
I would dearly love for the Dummocrats to throw Hill & the Obamessiah overboard for teh Goracle. God, that would be so funny I’d pass out laughing. McCain would win like 70% of the vote without even trying!