Obama Lied Shamelessly About Ayers, ACORN, and BAIPA During Final Debate

But, before you listen to his lies and obfuscations, watch his totally inappropriate demeanor, as these troubling associations are brought up. He is positively beaming when McCain mentions ACORN, the thoroughly corrupt, radical organization that has spent $18 million to sign up 1.3 million voters in 21 states, and is now being investigated by the FBI for voter fraud. In a close election, a few thousand votes can make all the difference. What the hell is so funny?

This is no laughing matter.

First of all, Obama says he served on a board with Ayers, when they served on two, the Woods Fund, and The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, as well as at least a couple of panels. A timeline of their interactions can be found here. The fact that the two worked closely together is glossed over by Obama, who merely repeated his usual talking points about being only 8 years old when Ayers committed those “despicable acts”. Even more egregious is when he denied that his political career was launched in William Ayers’ living room:

MCCAIN: Well, again, while you were on the board of the Woods Foundation, you and Mr. Ayers, together, you sent $230,000 to ACORN. So — and you launched your political campaign in Mr. Ayers’ living room.

OBAMA: That’s absolutely not true.

MCCAIN: And the facts are facts and records are records.

OBAMA: And that’s not the facts.

That is a bald faced lie. At this point, it is a matter of public record that Obama launched his political career in The Ayers’ living room.

It’s blatant obfuscation when he patiently informs us that the grant for the CAC came from Republican, Walter Annenberg, an obviously trusting man, who never dreamed his money would be squandered as it was, on unworthy, radical, afrocentric organizations. It’s more obfuscation when he tells us that Ayers is not advising him in his campaign, and won’t when he’s in the White House. Nobody’s made that allegation.

Shameless.

As for ACORN: notice how he shakes his head, when McCain mentions the $800,000 Obama gave to the organization. He doesn’t go so far as to deny such an easily checked recent fact, but is willing to lie about his past extensive association with ACORN in the ’90’s when he was a community oraganizer. That’s a little harder to fact check, and takes some digging. But the truth is, he did more than represent the group once as an attorney. He was a member of The New Party, the short lived Socialistic political party that shared its national office with ACORN. He led “Project Vote”, a front group of ACORN (and from the same address)in the early nineties, as well as led “ACORN Power Training” classes. He also promised ACORN and friends that they would help shape his presidential agenda. More about Obama’s ties to ACORN, here.

On to the The Born Alive Infant Protection act:

Here, Obama deploys the old “if it sounds incredible…it’s not true” excuse.Who would vote to allow already born infants to die?

Well, as many of us have been saying; it IS incredible, and, sadly it IS true. He did that. FOUR times. I was flabbergasted the first time I heard about it, and I didn’t even know the full extent of his opposition yet.

Obama expects people to say, “That can’t possibly be true. It must be an unfair smear”, because of the sheer monstrosity of his position in the Illinois  Senate. But it’s not an unfair smear. It’s absolutely true.

That should tell you something about the man.

About these ads

28 Responses to “Obama Lied Shamelessly About Ayers, ACORN, and BAIPA During Final Debate”

  1. Jamie Holts Says:

    I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work :)

    Like

  2. june chun Says:

    You guys need to quit! You distort facts to make it seem as if McCain is sooo clean! I wouldn’t trust McCain with this economy even if his wife can probably afford to pay off the national debt! Republicans are now grasping at straws! Obama is smart, and that’s what this economy needs, not the same policies of the past!

    Like

  3. John Sieber Says:

    If he lied, why bother adding the word “shamelessly”? If you’re right, why do you use adverbs to make yourself sound right?

    There is another side to this story, and those who talk about the story completely ignore the other side. Why would you do this?

    Like

  4. Sparky Says:

    Deb,
    What is so much more frightening to me are the Libs that have absolutly no negative reaction to Ayers. Many of the comments concerning this monster, from Democrats, are basically….”so what”….and…”who cares”. This is an individual who advocated the killing of police officers, or in his words..’pigs”. And to this day does not regret any of his actions. I am so afraid for our country. What is next? Is genocide okay if “group think” says it’s okay? Right has become Wrong, and Wrong is now Right. We are living in an upside society. God help us.

    Like

  5. John Sieber Says:

    And another thing, just because Ayers threw a party for Obama doesn’t mean that his political campaign was “launched” there. I would assume he “launched” his campaign when he decided to run for office.

    Why are the anti-Obama stories like this always full of anecdotal evidence and interpreted coincidence?

    Like

  6. nicedeb Says:

    Dude.

    Tell me the other side of the story.

    Most politicians will spin the facts a bit, now and again, to put their position in the best possible light. The types of lies Obama is engaging in, are rare, and yes, shameless.

    You have to be shameless to lie like that.

    Like

  7. nicedeb Says:

    Sieber, enough with the sophistic arguments. I’m not wasting my time with it.

    You should spend your time looking deeper into Ayers and Obama’s relationship, and how it ties in with all of his other radical relationships.

    Like

  8. Blackiswhite, Imperial Agent Provocateur Says:

    At what point does the mountain of coincidences become too much to explain away?

    Obama is “smart”???

    If he’s so smart, why does he have the freinds, associates, and aquantences he has?

    If he’s so smart, why is he advocating taxing the eyes out of the only people and entities positioned to help us out of a bad economy?

    If he is so smart, how can he seriously advocate wealth distribution and talk about “improving the economy”???

    Like

  9. John Sieber Says:

    Okay people, let’s use our common sense here.

    So Far I have seen people try to tie Obama to: a violent activist, supporters of the Manson killing spree, a far-left party bordering on communism, and an organization several times questioned on voter fraud.

    How could he have gotten as far as he has, in our information age, with those connections? Over the past 17 years, surely someone would have discovered all of this and brought it to people’s attention. But we are only hearing about these controversies now, not in 1991, not in 2001, not at ALL during this entire campaign, until the past couple weeks. And now, he’s leading major polls over McCain by at least a dozen points every day, even with all of this controversy. So…

    IF HE IS REALLY SUCH A BAD GUY, THEN HOW DOES HE GET PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR HIM?

    Like

  10. nicedeb Says:

    Good grief, Sieber.

    Google “Corrupt Chicago political machine”.

    Like

  11. John Sieber Says:

    Got any info that wasn’t written by a Republican?

    Like

  12. nicedeb Says:

    What? Am I in charge of the whole internet, now?

    Try Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Democratic_Machine

    Like

  13. John Sieber Says:

    “Commonly called the ‘Chicago machine’, the organization dominated Chicago politics from the 1930s through to the 1970s.”

    I also didn’t find the word “corrupt” on that page.

    Obviously this blog allows circumstantial evidence and spun articles and uses them as the basis for their arguments. I have been met with these tactics with every post I have made. This is something a rational person can not be a part of.

    Like

  14. nicedeb Says:

    Sieber, there are verifiable facts that have been addressed on this blog that point to Obama’s lies. For instance, Obama’s lie that his association with ACORN is limited to having represented them as an attorney.

    It is not “circumstantial evidence”, but a verifiable FACT that Obama led “Project Vote”, an offshoot of ACORN in the early nineties, which he admits on his own fight the smears website. It is a verifiable FACT that Obama taught “ACORN power training” classes.

    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-ran-acorns-training-sessions-on-power

    It is a verifiable FACT that he gave ACORN $800,000 for GOTV activities. (read: fraud).

    It is a verifiable FACT that he told a group of community organizers (including ACORN) that they would help set the agenda in his administration.

    Those are the facts I base my arguments on.

    What are you using as a basis for your arguments?

    Like

  15. Blackiswhite, Imperial Agent Provocateur Says:

    Obviously this blog allows circumstantial evidence and spun articles and uses them as the basis for their arguments. I have been met with these tactics with every post I have made. This is something a rational person can not be a part of.

    Its amazing that people can be in shit up to their eyeballs and refuse to recognize their predicament until someone gives them a taste.

    Like

  16. Cathy Says:

    Thanks NiceDeb. Another good job. I so appreciate this.

    Every time Obama opens his mouth when confronted this way spinning things to sound harmless when he knows darn well there is so much more to the story that he is covering up — he is acting SHAMELESSLY. He does it so much and so well that he is not the least bit ASHAMED by his own lying. He is very good at it — and has acquired the ability to sound like a southern preacher. I think this is how he has remained credible to those who do not check the facts. It sends chills up my back to think that this kind of liar might well make it into the White House and represent the USA to the world.

    Like

  17. geoff Says:

    But we are only hearing about these controversies now, not in 1991, not in 2001, not at ALL during this entire campaign, until the past couple weeks.

    Maybe you just heard about it, but the rest of us have known about these controversies for more than a year.

    Welcome aboard.

    Like

  18. nicedeb Says:

    Thank YOU Cathy, for the kind words.

    Maybe you just heard about it, but the rest of us have known about these controversies for more than a year.

    I think Chicago has known about the shady local politics for some time, now, too.

    Like

  19. Peter Says:

    Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Acon, these are troubling associations that Obama had. Explain to me, how can one sat for 20 years listening to the anti America sermons without any disagreement if he didn’t agree to the radical ideaology. He worked with William Ayers to turn high school student into the 60s radicals. He used Acon to get fraudulent votes for his advantgage (which must have played a role in his winning over Clinton in the close primary contests). Now after benefiting and advancing his political career from all these associations, he is now distancing himself from them. How can we know that he really means it? He said that he would use public finance when he was behind and went back on his words when it’s to his advantgage not to use public finance.

    Like

  20. nicedeb Says:

    I don’t know how anybody can look at it all, and not be able to connect the dots.

    It’s willful ignorance, imo.

    Like

  21. Bruce Says:

    I guess Obama gets support because of the fact that at least 50% of the voting public are total morons. Case in point … Seiber and “June Chun”.

    I would guess that the Kos Kids distribute a list of anti-Obama blogs such as this, Ace, JAWA, etc (I don’t list my own because I don’t allow comments for this very reason) to their “get in their faces” punks. How many of these morons are the same person using different ID’s? Note they don’t have provable links. Can you see IP addresses, Deb? I have a plugin for that.

    Like

  22. nicedeb Says:

    Can you see IP addresses, Deb?

    Yeah, but I’ve never thought to look.

    Like

  23. Gossip Girl Says:

    I find it extraordinary that the Obama supporters are in total denial of these facts. They are documentable facts…U. of Illinois just released the docs on Chicago Annenberg Challenge a couple of weeks ago. These are documented hard print facts, not rumor or gossip. Why are they in such a state of denial? I for one do not want a close associate of a known America hater (Rev. Wright) and terrorist (Bill Ayers) to be representing me as Pres. of the United States. It doesn’t matter how well you prove it to them, they just say it’s a smear. This is the most frustrating and scary political situation I have ever witnessed.

    Like

  24. Gossip Girl Says:

    I think that perhaps it is the way he lies so facilely, so convincingly. His demeanor makes them think he is not lying, but he is. Of course, that’s the way sociopaths are. They are totally narcissistic, they have no sense of right and wrong, and they believe their own stories.

    This guy will be negotiating with other countries and safeguarding home security? 9/11 wasn’t that long ago. If only we could remember how we felt that day. Or history is doomed to repeat itself.

    I’m sure some bloggers will rant their usual denial, but all of this is true. I dare them to call the University of Illinois and ask for the records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. It will show a money trail from a grant to Ayers, distributed by Obama, funnelled through Acorn. $110 million.

    Get a clue, people.

    Like

  25. The Obama Juggernaut Of Corruption, Fraud, And Media Bias « Nice Deb Says:

    [...] a media lying for its chosen candidate, and looking the other way when its chosen candidate lies. [...]

    Like

  26. Obama Lied About His Opposition To IL Born Alive Bill in 2008 - Won't Comment on Gosnell Trial | Real Hot News on ZBlogging Says:

    [...] federal version because they were virtually the same bill word for word. Many voices on the right argued this point but were ignored by the media. Obama called the National Right to Life Committee liars. The MSM let [...]

    Like

  27. Obama Lied About His Opposition To IL Born Alive Bill in 2008 – Won’t Comment on Gosnell Trial | Says:

    [...] federal version because they were virtually the same bill word for word. Many voices on the right argued this point but were ignored by the media. Obama called the National Right to Life Committee liars. The MSM let [...]

    Like

  28. Obama Lied About His Opposition To IL Born Alive Bill in 2008 – Won't Comment on Gosnell Trial | Tony Johnson Says:

    [...] federal version because they were virtually the same bill word for word. Many voices on the right argued this point but were ignored by the media. Obama called the National Right to Life Committee liars. The MSM let [...]

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,684,738 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow Nice Deb on WordPress.com
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 547 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: