Video: ACORN’s Scott Levenson Finally Meets His Match

Acorn’s wacky Scott Levenson meets Fox News’ wacky talk show host Glenn Beck.

The result is hi-larious:

Allahpundit made me LOL:

I understand why they continue to book him — angering the host is great for ratings — but why, given his astounding Edwards-esque unctuousness, does ACORN continue to send him as their rep? It’s practically an exercise in self-sabotage. I’m sitting here numb with horror at the possibility that he might be the most likable guy they have.

Love this classic Levenson photoshop from the 2008 election:

acornscott1

On a more serious note, Levenson’s oft repeated claim that ACORN has only been caught engaging in voter registration fraud, (not voter fraud, you sillybilly!) is a smokescreen for the fact that election boards, beleaguered with thousands of fraudulent registrations from ACORN, are not able to  catch them all,  so a certain percentage of fraudulent registrations do end up on the rolls, and it’s almost impossible to catch the actual voter fraud when it occurs.

More:

See Hot Air for part 2 where Beck recounts  what happened during the commercial break.

Video: CNN On The Air Force One Photos

CNN’s Lou Dobbs thinks it’s odd that Obama won’t release the photos that scared the bejesus out of New Yorkers for a price tag of $328,000, but will release the Abu Ghraib photos, and interrogation memos:

Nothing wrong with the old photos?

What was the whole reason for the “photo op”, then?

Previously at Nice Deb:

White House Not Releasing Scare Force One Photos

Air Force One 2009 (photoshop)

UPDATE:

The White House is feeling the heat.

Fox News reports:

The White House plans to soon release a photo from the controversial Air Force One-style flyover of Manhattan last week, despite claiming earlier that there was no need to release any official images from the incident.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Wednesday that an internal report will probably be completed this week.

“We’ll release its findings and release a photo,” he said.

That was after Gibbs indicated Tuesday that the White House would not release any images.

The Anti-War Left EXPOSED

We hear a lot of talk these days of transparency. Well, here’s your transparency, via The Environmental Republican who scoured the internet, today, looking for condemnation from the anti-war left on the recent predator strikes ordered by Obama on a Western village in Pakistan which killed 15 people, including children.*

Amazingly enough (not really), Code Pink, International A.N.S.W.E.R, Not In Our Name, Iraq Veterans Against The War, Veterans For Peace, United For Peace And Justice, and Medea Benjamin were completely mum on the attacks.

Not. a. single. reference. to the attacks was found on any of the websites.

Conservatives have been seeing through the anti-war brigades’ b.s. for the longest time, but now the truth should be clear to everyone. Nothing could be more transparent.

I posted excerpts from this article by David Horowitz in my Does The President Hate His Own Country post, but his points are even more apropos, here:

My parents were members of the American Communist Party and I was part of the progressive left, which was the communist left, and which has grown ominously large today, and has seen its candidate elected to the White House. I was the editor of the largest magazine of the New Left, which was organized by the children of communists, so-called red diaper babies like myself. We regarded America as the enemy. We began as an isolated political minority, but the hate America crowd has grown alarmingly in size since then. Today, nobody is embarrassed about slandering his own country even in time of war — and this includes our current president, who recently apologized for the actions of his country to Latin American communists, Jew-haters and self-declared enemies, such as Venezuela’s Chavez and Nicaraguan jefe Daniel Ortega, a degenerate who molested his own daughter.

Here is Obama last year slandering the troops  for doing what he just authorized:

It becomes clear that the real goal of the anti-war left is to weaken America, the country they believe is to blame for all of the world’s ills:

During the Vietnam years, the goal of the so-called antiwar movement was to cause America to lose the war — and that includes every leader of the anti-Vietnam left: John Kerry, Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, and so on. The anti-Vietnam movement wanted America to lose because for the left, for progressives, we are the bad guys: America, the oppressor. America did lose the Vietnam war as a result of our protests. The anti-American antiwar movement forced America to give up the fight for freedom in Vietnam, to retreat from the field of battle, to withdraw overnight. It was the same prescription that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reed and the congressional Democrats wanted for Iraq. Fortunately they failed, and consequently Iraq is not ruled by terrorists today.

But in Indo-China the ending was different. Once America quit the field of battle, the Communists proceeded to slaughter two-and a-half million poor Vietnamese and Cambodian peasants – one of the worst genocides in history. But there wasn’t a single demonstration by progressives against this atrocity. Bloodbaths are okay if they are committed by progressives of color in the name of “social justice.”

From Communism to Islamo-fascism, the left in America – as elsewhere – has had a lifelong love affair with tyranny and terror, which is the title of an important book that one of my FrontPage editors, Jamie Glazov, has just published. It’s called: United in Hate, the Left’s Love Affair with Tyranny and Terror. That is who they are. Progressives are adept at speaking the language of peace and love and justice; but these words are just a smokescreen for their real agendas which are search and destroy. Anybody who has ever encountered a progressive up close in any kind of political disagreement knows that this is a hate movement. They hate conservatives; they hate Republicans; they hate white males, and increasingly they hate Christians and Jews. They hated George Bush.

You see the evidence of the Christian, Jew, and Bush bashing everywhere you look.

You see it in the escalating attacks on Carrie Prejean. You see it on the Anti-war websites which are mum on Obama’s airstrikes but passionately condemn Israel’s air-strikes into Gaza. You see it with the continuing blame of everything that’s wrong in the country, nay the world on former President Bush.

When did America become so blind? How did it come to this?

Hat tip: Instapundit

*CORRECTION

The Environmental Republican post I linked to above, is from January 24, following Obama’s first airstrike into Pakistan. I had mistakenly assumed it was a recent post as it was linked to by Instapundit. A recheck of the anti war group websites that he linked to reveal crickets on the more recent airsrikes, too.

UPDATE:

Well, we finally found an organization willing to condemn the airstrikes.

Thank you CAIR, for your intellectual honesty.

MORE:

For one of the best rants of righteous indignation directed toward the anti-war left, you will ever read, see Mike at Cold Fury.

Michael Savage Banned In Britain

Allahpundit is right, this is a bizarre story. Michael Savage, a controversial talk show host has been lumped in with Jihadists, neo-Nazis, a child-killing savage from Hezbollah, and  Fred Phelps, and banned from entering the United Kingdom.

Not surprisingly, Savage is suing:

Savage told The Chronicle that being included in such a crowd is no laughing matter — and he is now preparing legal action against Smith, he said.

“This lunatic … is linking me up with Nazi skinheads who are killing people in Russia, she’s putting me in a league with Hamas murderers who kill Jews on busses,” he said. “I have never advocated violence … I’ve been on the air 15 years. My views may be inflammatory, but they’re not violent in any way.”

He said he has been defamed and endangered by the British government action. “She has painted a target on my back, linking me with people who are in prison for killing people,” he said. “Does she not think people might hunt me down?”

Savage said he has had no contact with the British government or with Smith’s office and has no idea how he ended up on the British Home secretary’s list.

Unlike Allah, I have listened to Michael Savage from time to time on the car radio when I’m out driving around. I have no idea why he’s on the list, either. He’s certainly controversial, frequently emotional, boastful, hyperbolic, often wrong, and almost always obnoxious. But he’s not violent, and doesn’t promote violence.

He delights in insulting individuals on both the left and the right, especially those who compete with him  in talk radio. That has made him “persona non grata” amongst conservative talkers like Mark Levin, who seemed to be referencing Savage’s predicament on his radio show, tonight:

It’s really too bad Savage has made  enemies of people who should be his allies in the  battle against politically correct fascism.

More at FrontPageMagazine:

As a political gesture, the British blacklist is in equal parts ridiculous and dangerous. Whatever one’s views of Savage’s on-air antics – and he has long since apologized to the gay community for his most outrageous remark, to a caller, that he should “get AIDS and die” – by no means does he deserve to be grouped with child killers, mass-murdering terrorists, and racists. No less absurd is the premise that the genuine extremists on the list will somehow be “shamed” by their mention. More likely, previously obscure terror leaders like Nasr Javed will savor their moment of international infamy and the attendant boost to their reputation.
The more worrying aspect of the official blacklist is the explicit message that British authorities will no longer tolerate opinions with which they disagree. How else to explain the inclusion of Savage, who fits none of the definitions of violent extremism that the Home Office cites as grounds for a ban, namely support for or incitement of terrorism and criminal activity? It is true that Savage has sometimes said inflammatory things, a point he readily concedes, but the fact that he is now banned from Britain invites the uncomfortable suspicion that anyone with an opinion uncongenial to the Home Office is no longer welcome in the country.

White House Not Releasing Scare Force One Photos

Imagine that.

airforce-one-2

$328,835 for an Air Force One/NYC photo op, and no photos to show for it. You’d almost think that the  incident from last week, which scared the bejesus out of many unlucky New Yorkers, was something other than just a photo op.

You might also wonder why photos of  Air Force One buzzing around the Empire State Building is considered classified information, but photos from Abu Ghraib, and CIA memos about our interrogation techniques are not.

Oh well, never mind that…. The whole thing is just such a hoot!

Hat tip: Drew at AoSHQ

Today’s Compare And Contrast

The Washington Post’s enchanted™ Dana Milbank:

obama-enchanted23Maybe Barack Obama really is The One.

Yesterday’s news was good — almost supernaturally so.

The economy? Recovering.

The markets? Rallying.

Swine flu? Abating.

Drought? Ending.

*********************************************************************************************************

Hooray!!! All is well in the kingdom! Teh One has slayed all the dragons!

*********************************************************************************************************

Pravda:

American Capitalism Gone With A Whimper


obamacommie1It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.

***********************************************************************************************************

Draw your own conclusions.

***********************************************************************************************************

It must also be said, that we’re not all “sheeple”:

not-sheeple

Happy “Cinco De Cuatro”

He meant to say “Cuatro de Mayo,” or the Fourth of May….Where were you TOTUS?!

The slip-up occurs in the first few seconds:

Mary Kathryn Ham doesn’t want to be mean, but…

I like to note these little incidents when they happen, not because I think it makes Obama an idiot because he occasionally stumbles over his words, but because his somewhat overblown reputation as the most cerebral, eloquent, utterly erudite president of all time could really use a pricking every now and then.

Also, because if Bush had made such a blunder, it would have been the basis of a four-part MSNBC investigative series on the malapropism’s deleterious effects on the Republican Party’s attempts to woo Hispanic voters, Mexican-American relations, and our “place in the world.”

True dat.

Does The President Hate His Own Country?

obama-flag

More than a few people are beginning to wonder. Joan Swirsky chronicles the mounting evidence in this marathon post at CFP.

A snippet:

Scan you memory. Can you think of any other leader in world history who so consistently badmouths his own country, or fails to defend it? I can’t.

Wall St. Journal writer Dorothy Rabinowitz notes that Obama “had gone to Europe not as the voice of his nation, but as a missionary with a message of atonement for its errors. No sitting American president had ever delivered indictments of this kind while abroad, or for that matter at home. When [our allies] see Obama’s moral equivalence, they realize they are on their own and must cut their own deals to survive – understanding that multicultural trendiness is now a cynical cover for moral laxity and ‘can’t we all get along?’

Historian Victor Davis Hanson also noticed something odd about Obama’s apology tour. “Despite this fresh climate of atonement, there was a complete absence of a single apology from any other foreign leader…not a word came from Britain about colonialism…nothing from Germany on the Holocaust…not a peep from France about Algeria or Vietnam. Turkey was mum on the Armenian killings…Russia said nothing about the 30 million murdered by Stalin…Nothing came from China about the 70 million who perished under Mao…Mr. Medvedev said nothing about Putin’s brutish rule…We saw no concrete evidence of any help — or hope and change — from any foreign leader. Zilch.”

In addition, Hanson continues, “We hear nothing about our Gettysburg, or our entry into World War I. Iwo Jima and the Bulge are never alluded to. Drawing the line in Korea and forcing the end of the Soviet monstrosity are taboo subjects. That we pledged the life of New York for Berlin in the Cold War is unknown. Liberating Afghanistan and Iraq from the diabolical Taliban and Saddam Hussein is left unsaid. The Civil Rights movement, the Great Society, affirmative action, and present billion-dollar foreign-aid programs apparently never existed. Millions of Africans have been saved by George Bush’s efforts at extending life-saving medicines to AIDS patients — but again, this is never referenced.”

Blogger James Lewis says that Obama’s “obsessive need to put down his own country shows a stunningly ignorant man who has evidently never spoken to a concentration camp survivor, a Cuban refugee, a boat person from Vietnam, a Soviet dissident, or a survivor of Mao’s purges.”

And Media Research Center’s Brent Bozell adds, “Obama `gets’ the America-haters.”

Read the whole thing.

He not only “gets” the America-haters…he reads them, and passes along their  delusions to the whole world.

What do our allies think about this? It’s hard to tell, but Dr. Jack Wheeler offers some clues after speaking with a  French Intelligence guy.

Hat tip: Lucianne

RELATED:

D.L. Hammack at the American Thinker was amused by the carnival of gaffes and missteps early on, but now finds the deeds of the Obama administration to be no laughing matter:

Initially, I thought that regardless of his left-leaning motivations, he surely would not endanger the people of America or cause them undue hardships as a result of his desires?  How wrong I was!  This man…the administration couldn’t give a damn about the people or their suffering, as long as it advances their agenda and creates a future throng of democratic voters who are addicted to the state.  It’s time for us to recognize that this President, his cabinet, his staff, his Supreme Court appointees all have a common interest and that interest has nothing whatsoever to do with the people of this country.

Until we wake up and see this charade, this façade called the administration of change, we will continue to dig a hole so deep that no manner of “change” will allow us to escape from the policy mandates this President will force upon us.  Wake up America, or one day we will wake up and see an America that we no longer recognize or want to be a part of.  Those of us who recognize what is going on will continue to speak out to make people aware and we will continue to be singled out by the administration; vilified if necessary, as they continue the process of steamrolling America to accomplish their agenda.

MORE:

Maggie at Stop The ACLU asks, What Is Obama Up To? in Sizing Up Barack Obama:

His life has been fully marinated in the world view of those who hate capitalism, call the US the source of much of the world’s evil, believe the Jews to be the main problem of the Middle East, see themselves as most qualified to govern “the people”, equate opposition with heresy and despise traditional religions and values. They are absolute and total creatures of government and could not survive outside of it. Indeed, this is the reason why all of their proposals involve government. The greater the size of government, the more power they have. The fact that liberty is reduced for the citizenry is irrelevant, since the ruing classes will always have the freedom to do what they wish.

The thing I’ve been saying for the longest time is, you can’t understand Obama without looking into his past experiences and influences.

One MORE:

David Horowitz, a former Communist, grew up in a commie family just like Obama. He understands the anti-American mindset. He was once a part of that world. Here he describes not just Obama, but most of the Dems in congress:

From Communism to Islamo-fascism, the left in America – as elsewhere – has had a lifelong love affair with tyranny and terror, which is the title of an important book that one of my FrontPage editors, Jamie Glazov, has just published. It’s called: United in Hate, the Left’s Love Affair with Tyranny and Terror. That is who they are. Progressives are adept at speaking the language of peace and love and justice; but these words are just a smokescreen for their real agendas which are search and destroy. Anybody who has ever encountered a progressive up close in any kind of political disagreement knows that this is a hate movement. They hate conservatives; they hate Republicans; they hate white males, and increasingly they hate Christians and Jews. They hated George Bush.

How can you hate George Bush? He may have done a lot of things that you wouldn’t have done; but how can you hate the man? But they do. They are haters. Their mouths drip with hate. You can’t name a single conservative spokesman from Rush Limbaugh to Ann Coulter, to Sarah Palin to, well, George Bush, who hasn’t been stigmatized, slandered, demonized, libeled, and trashed as indecent, beneath humanity, contemptible, toxic, and viral.

How toxic can they be? Consider their behavior during the Iraq war:

America’s armed forces were in the field facing enemy fire. The Democrats had authorized the war that sent them into harm’s way. But the minute trouble started – three months after hostilities began — the Democrats pulled out and went into full attack mode against their own country, against their elected commander-in-chief, accusing America of being the aggressor in the war, a criminal nation, an occupier, and torturer.

And how did they explain their about-face? What reason did they give for first authorizing the war and then conducting a propaganda campaign against it? For first supporting their country and then condemning it? For indicting their own country as an aggressor nation conducting an unnecessary war against a country that posed “no threat”? (These were the precise terms that Al Gore used to attack his president and his country in his book The Assault on Reason, which was an apt description of the book itself.)

The Democratic leaders explained their betrayal of a war they had authorized by saying that they were lied to, that the president “manipulated the intelligence” to fool them into supporting the use of force against Saddam Hussein. But this was in itself the most obvious and biggest lie of the war. Democrats sit on all the intelligence committees and have access to every intelligence secret America possesses. How could Bush manipulate the intelligence data that John Kerry had on his desk? The answer is: he couldn’t.

The Democrats needed this particular lie, however, because they could not admit the real reason for their betrayal. The real reason that Kerry and his colleagues changed their views on the war had nothing to do with the intelligence data or Iraq. It was because a candidate named Howard Dean, who was running on a platform opposing the war, was about to win the Democratic presidential primary as the war moved into its third month. That was the real and only reason why John Kerry turned against the war and for the second time in his wretched career stabbed America’s fighting men and women in the field in the back. For five years, while American troops were fighting the terrorists in Iraq, the Democratic leadership conducted a propaganda war against them, showing that they were perfectly willing to risk the lives and safety of our troops for political gains for their party. Shame on them.

You can’t conduct a campaign saying that America is the aggressor in a war without encouraging the enemy and increasing his strength. You can’t destroy national security programs by leaking them to the New York Times and defending the leaks, without endangering American lives. You can’t conduct an open-ended campaign to define America as a criminal nation without sapping Americans’ ability to defend themselves in a dangerous world with enemies who believe that murdering Americans is a fast-track to the kingdom of heaven. But that is what progressives and the Democratic leadership have done — and they are same individuals who are running our nation today.


God help us.


Specter Wastes No Time In Politicizing Jack Kemp’s Death

Despicable:

“Well, I was sorry to disappoint many people. Frankly, I was disappointed that the Republican Party didn’t want me as their candidate,” Mr. Specter said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “But as a matter of principle, I’m becoming much more comfortable with the Democrats’ approach. And one of the items that I’m working on, Bob, is funding for medical research.”

Mr. Specter continued: “If we had pursued what President Nixon declared in 1970 as the war on cancer, we would have cured many strains. I think Jack Kemp would be alive today. And that research has saved or prolonged many lives, including mine.”

Video, via Hot Air:

Ed Morressey calls Specter’s assertion a “grotesque lie”:

During Republican control of Congress, federal spending on health research and regulation increased 46% after inflation, from $49 billion a year to $72 billion a year, or about 7% increase each year.  That’s almost the same rate of increase as Defense spending got in the same period (48%), when we actually had a real war on our hands, and not a political contrivance for excusing federal spending.

Specter is right about one thing, however. He is right at home with the “Democrat’s approach”, taking a page right out of another Dem hack’s playbook. Remember this classic?:

Speaking at a rally in Iowa on Monday — the day after Reeve’s death — Democratic vice-presidential candidate John Edwards noted the performer’s advocacy for stem-cell research for finding a cure for spinal injuries. The actor, who died of heart failure on Sunday evening, had championed the cause ever since a 1995 horse-riding accident left him paralyzed.

Edwards was discussing stem-cell research with the Iowa audience when he said: “If we do the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to walk again. Get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.”

No shame.

The Enchanted Media Strikes Again

obama-enchanted2White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was interrupted by Obama, who came to say a few words about the retirement of Justice David Souter, during the daily press briefing on Friday.  The White House Press Corps jumped to their feet.

Someone dug up an old video of a Bush appearance during a press briefing during his tenure. Note the different reaction:

In related news:

The White House denies that it would use the White House Press Corps to make threats against Chrysler investors.

No, Obama would never use these fine folks to do anything like that, my goodness, hush your mouth!

Incidentally, Bush may not have had the support of the *jackals in the media, but let us not forget that many other Americans supported him enthusiastically throughout his Presidency.

*Yes, I realize there are still a few good journalists out there. I’m generalizing.

Hat tip: Weasel Zippers

White House Threatens Chrysler Non-Tarp Investment Companies (UPDATED)

It’s the Chicago Way or the highway, now in Washington.

Newsbusters notices that the MSM has thus far,  studiously avoided this chilling exchange that took place on Frank Beckman’s Show, this morning:

What follows is a rush transcription, omitting the intro and wrap-up niceties, of an interview today between WJR’s Frank Beckmann and Tom Lauria, attorney for most of (at the moment) Chrysler’s non-TARP creditors (audio is here; NYT link in transcript added by me):

Beckmann: So what’s the matter with your vulture clients who are so greedy and selfish. Why won’t they go along with this?

Lauria: Well, they bought a contract that says that they get paid before anyone else does by Chrysler. And they have been told by the government who is in complete control of Chrysler, oddly enough, that despite their contractual right, they do not get paid before everyone else.

So they are standing on their rights, standing on the law, trying to defend in effect what is the Constitution of the United States, to make sure that they get what they’re entitled to for their investors.

Beckmann: Tom, let me make the argument against you in another way. We’ve heard the President say this, “I wouldn’t want to stand on their side.” Ron Gettelfinger says “Everyone else has made concessions. These people won’t; they’re greedy.” Why not take a concession that is being asked of everybody else and is being accepted by everybody else, including other hedge funds that had bought some of these bonds in Chrysler?

Lauria: Well that’s a great question, because let me tell you it’s no fund standing on this side of the fence opposing the President of the United States. In fact, let me just say, people have asked me who I represent, and that’s a moving target.

I can tell you for sure that I represent one less investor today than I represented yesterday. One of my clients was directly threatened by the White House, and in essence compelled to withdraw its opposition to the deal under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. That’s how hard it is to stand on this side of the fence.

Beckmann: Was that Perella Weinberg?

Lauria: That was Perella Weinberg.

Beckmann: All right.

You can read the rest of the interview, and/or listen to the audio at Newsbusters.

Again, anybody who was paying attention during the election season, could have predicted that such thug-like tactics would be employed by the white House.

We could have predicted that it would be ignored by the MSM, too.

More (via Lucianne) on Chrysler’s rogue creditors, here.

First comment at Lucianne’s:

Let these investment companies know they have the support of the American people. The big three are Oppenheimer Funds 1.800.CALL.OPP (1.800.225.5677), Perrella Weinberg Partners(212.287.3200) and Stairway Capital (Phone: 516.629.3478. Fax: 516.629.3481.)

Sounds like it’s too late for Perrella Weinberg Partners.

I wonder if Obama’s dirt digging dept. is up and running.

UPDATE:

Ed Morrissey wants to know how the White House Press Corps feels about being used as Obama’s attack dogs.

Enchanted?

UPDATE II:

Jake Tapper:

White House Denies Charge By Attorney that Administration Threatened to Destroy Investment Firm’s Reputation

You believe that?

Me neither.

UPDATE (5/5):

Charges of White House Threats to Persecute Chrysler Creditors Corroborated

Ace has all the latest.

This story may have legs:  more here, and here.


2006 Video: Obama On Supreme Court Nominees

According to Obama, some wrong headed rubes think that “a President, having won the election, should have complete authority to appoint his nominee, and the Senate should only examine whether or not whether the Justice is intellectually capable and is nice to his wife etc etc…”

But Obama knows better:

Video Via Naked Emperor News.

What with Justice Souter’s recent announcement that he’s retiring, and Obama’s top three contenders to replace him being far lefties, I was counting on Republicans to examine his eventual nominee’s  philosophy, ideology and record. I trust the Republicans will not be shy in  bringing any troubling concerns to the public’s attention. I’m delighted that Obama approves.

Border Patrol Agents Told Not To Wear Protective Masks

But, I’m sure hand-washing is encouraged:

Jim Hoft notes that DHS is refuting reports that it told agents at US airports and checkpoints they couldn’t wear face masks to protect themselves.

Who do you believe, Janet Napolitano or the reporter, the union rep, and the 80 employees who want to wear the masks, but were told they can’t ?

When it comes to Janet Napolitano’s DHS, this is a pattern we should all get used to:

1. Outrageous policy decision

2. Huge public outcry

3. Dissembling.

You can bank on it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers