Sarah Palin Responds To Obama’s Speech

palin-obama-b_0

Obama was calling her out when he scornfully mentioned “death panels”. Citizen Sarah posting at Facebook, is right back at him:

After all the rhetoric is put aside, one principle ran through President Obama’s speech tonight: that increased government involvement in health care can solve its problems.

Many Americans fundamentally disagree with this idea. We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with “more stability and security,” but just the opposite. It’s hard to believe the President when he says that this time he and his team of bureaucrats have finally figured out how to do things right if only we’ll take them at their word.

Our objections to the Democrats’ health care proposals are not mere “bickering” or “games.” They are not an attempt to “score short term political points.” And it’s hard to listen to the President lecture us not to use “scare tactics” when in the next breath he says that “more will die” if his proposals do not pass.

In his speech the President directly responded to concerns I’ve raised about unelected bureaucrats being given power to make decisions affecting life or death health care matters. He called these concerns “bogus,” “irresponsible,” and “a lie” — so much for civility. After all the name-calling, though, what he did not do is respond to the arguments we’ve made, arguments even some of his own supporters have agreed have merit.

In fact, after promising to “make sure that no government bureaucrat …. gets between you and the health care you need,” the President repeated his call for an Independent Medicare Advisory Council — an unelected, largely unaccountable group of bureaucrats charged with containing Medicare costs. He did not disavow his own statement that such a group, working outside of “normal political channels,” should guide decisions regarding that “huge driver of cost … the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives….” He did not disavow the statements of his health care advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, and continuing to pay his salary with taxpayer dollars proves a commitment to his beliefs. The President can keep making unsupported assertions, but until he directly responds to the arguments I’ve made, I’m going to call him out too.

It was heartening to hear the President finally recognize that tort reform is an important part of any solution. But this concession shouldn’t lead us to take our eye off the ball: the Democrats’ proposals will not reduce costs, and they will not deliver better health care. It’s this kind of “healthy skepticism of government” that truly reflects a “concern and regard for the plight of others.” We can’t wait to hear the details on that; we look forward to working with you on tort reform.

Finally, President Obama delivered an offhand applause line tonight about the cost of the War on Terror. As we approach the anniversary of the September 11th attacks and honor those who died that day and those who have died since in the War on Terror, in order to secure our freedoms, we need to remember their sacrifices and not demonize them as having had too high a price tag.

Remember, Mr. President, elected officials work for the people. Forcing a conclusion in order to claim a “victory” is not healthy for our country. We hear you say government isn’t always the answer; now hear us — that’s what we’ve been saying all along.

- Sarah Palin

23 Responses to “Sarah Palin Responds To Obama’s Speech”

  1. Deo Says:

    The only thing I object to is a person that does not hold any political post pontificating from FACEBOOK. It´s absurd.
    Doesn´t Palin´s ghostwriter have to teach her how tio use chopsticks or something….

  2. geoff Says:

    The only thing I object to is a person that does not hold any political post pontificating from FACEBOOK

    I hope you don’t really mean that you object to somebody writing whatever they want to on their own facebook page.

  3. Betty Says:

    DEO…do you know how tio use chopsticks? Sarah is a citizen of this country the same as you are. She is entitled to her opinion.

  4. Deo Says:

    Of course I know how to use chopsticks…I live in a the multicultural Republic of the USA…well, at least I DID, I live in Spain now, working for the embassy.

    Sarah is NOT the SAME as me or YOU. Sarah is holding herself ABOVE, as people who want to run for office DO. A person who leads by example. The problem is she is all over the place. She doesn´t hold public office now, she resigned. She is a paid speaker still collecting donations for her personal travel and legal, under the GUISE of running for office, when actually she cannot with the credentials and spotty resume she holds. Unless she does by some special TEAMSARAH decree.
    Politicians, any public figures are not the same as me. They DO endure public scrutiny, I don´t. I get to be one of the people in the peanut gallery. There is a huge difference.

  5. geoff Says:

    But why do you want to silence her? She’s just writing on her own facebook page – it’s the administration and media that are constantly elevating her to the level of spokesperson for the GOP.

    It seems that her success is what makes you want to censor her. That’s tough. Her resume is stronger than our current President’s, and her track record in managing her state is far superior to the mess the current administration is creating. I don’t think she’s ready for a Presidential run, either, but I’m certainly not going to tell her that she can’t try.

    After all, we just elected someone with no managerial, executive, economic, or foreign policy experience at all.

  6. JackStraw Says:

    >>Sarah is NOT the SAME as me or YOU. Sarah is holding herself ABOVE, as people who want to run for office DO

    Not sure I get this. In a democracy, you can’t hold yourself anywhere. You put your positions out and people either choose to follow and support you or not. I could “hold myself out” but I wouldn’t get elected dog catcher. Palin, on the other hand, has attracted a substantial following and they are what is holding her up.

    And while I agree with geoff that I don’t this she is ready for a presidential run yet she is far more qualified than Obama was and apparently still is. Besides, it’s fun to watch liberals explode in hissy fits every time she says boo.

  7. Deo Says:

    Palin has attracted a large gfollowing, still a minority. Palin´s detractors would say what Palin has attracted is the ¨lunatic fringe¨.
    Also, I think the comparison between Palin and the sitting president, any sitting president, is ludicrous.
    She is a paid speaker who collects donations from people that hold unrealistic expectations. She was a mayor and resigned from a governorship mid term. That dog won´t hunt.
    I think we really need to find another viable candidate for GOP nomination. Palin, with her checkered resume, it just isn´t going to fly. I personally, think she is silly.

    …and Jack straw, I think you are playing dumb, you know what I mean.

  8. nicedeb Says:

    Palin has attracted a large gfollowing, still a minority. Palin´s detractors would say what Palin has attracted is the ¨lunatic fringe¨.

    We’ve said the same about Obama’s cult following, which seems to be decreasing.

    Also, I think the comparison between Palin and the sitting president, any sitting president, is ludicrous.
    She is a paid speaker who collects donations from people that hold unrealistic expectations.

    Nobody is comparing Palin to the President. We are saying she has the right, and the prestige as a popular former Governor to speak out on any subject she wants to, especially for the fun of watching liberal heads explode.

    <iI think we really need to find another viable candidate for GOP nomination.

    “We” aren’t looking at Palin as a viable candidate for the GOP nomination, however much she scares you. But we do find her to be a fearless and effective spokeswoman.

    with her checkered resume,

    She doesn’t have a checkered resume. I can think of a few in the Obama administration who do, though, including Obama himself.

    I personally, think she is silly.

    YOU’RE silly.

  9. Charity Johnson Says:

    Ad hominem attacks on Palin are pointless and old. More to the point: that “elected officials work for the people” should be true, not sure how you quibble with the main point of the argument: it’s your country, not Congress’ or the President’s. I object to the remaking the basic nature of the governmental structure of the US. Let’s remember that the the USA has neither a centralized government. The Bill of Rights directly speaks not only about rights of the individual, but also _prohibitions_ on Congress. This is fundamentally important to American governance.
    However, if you back bigger government institutions, you may be forgetting that an institutions inherently cannot care for the individual and does not respond well and ably to individual concerns. Add to that, the fact that institutions do not die easily or well once they’ve outlived their usefulness: the stakeholders are the employees, and the voters have no direct control on putting them out of business.

  10. Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere Says:

    Of course I know how to use chopsticks…I live in a the multicultural Republic of the USA…well, at least I DID, I live in Spain now, working for the embassy.

    “Multicultural Republic of the USA”…spoken like a true denizen of Foggy Bottom.

    Also, I think the comparison between Palin and the sitting president, any sitting president, is ludicrous.
    She is a paid speaker who collects donations from people that hold unrealistic expectations.

    I agree. Perhaps if the left and the press (but I repeat myself) did not make her out to be the candidate in the last election, and continue to take shots at her in order to avoid scrutiny of the pretender voting present from the Oval Office, then perhaps she might have been able to finish her term as governor without having to continually detract from her duties in order to answer frivolous and trumped up ethics charges.
    I really can’t blame the left for being so scared of her though. She’s accomplished the things that feminists have told women for years that they could accomplish, and did it while maintaining conservative values and without aborting her children to continue her career. Just by being who she is, she is a powerful testimony against most of what the left stands for. They can’t let her exist without smears, mischarcterizations, and innuendo. They’d lose followers.

  11. Betty Says:

    I don’t really look to Palin as a possible candidate. I look at her as an American. She has as much right to say whatever she wants. We have the right to talk about her. Which one of us is unAmerican? Isn’t it amazing the words that have been introduced since this group in the administration came to be? Gosh.. I voted democratic for well over 50 years. Never do I remember going through times like these.

  12. Deo Says:

    Palin didn´t finish her governorship because there was a fork in the road, she took the road marked KA CHING.

  13. Sparky Says:

    Sarah said it with grace, I won’t. He’s an arrogant liar, extreme socialist, terrorist sympathizer, dictator sympathizer, and all around scary president. That’s all.

  14. geoff Says:

    Palin didn´t finish her governorship because there was a fork in the road, she took the road marked KA CHING.

    Because the other road led to bankruptcy.

  15. Deo Says:

    Betty, are you joking?
    WORDS INTRODUCED SINCE THIS ADMINISTRATION…????????

    for 8 years you were called UNPATRIOTIC, UNAMERICAN, PINKO, etc…if you didn´t want to guzzle iraqi baby blood for breakfast .
    Wow, talk about wearing blinders, and covering your ears.

    Ok, I ám out of here. I think you´re all lame.
    Sarah Palin-Tonya Harding 2012!
    GOOD LUCK with that!

  16. JackStraw Says:

    >>and Jack straw, I think you are playing dumb, you know what I mean.

    No, actually I don’t. On the one hand you slam Palin for her lack of credentials and say there is no way she could ever seriously run for office and on the other hand you say she is making money pretending to run for office. It can’t be both.

    Whether you or I think Palin is running or is even qualified to run is immaterial. She is currently making a living commenting on the politics and policy of the day and she has developed an enormous following. I might not agree with everything she says or how she says it she energizes a lot of people and brings issues to the forefront in ways other people don’t seem to be able to.

    Death panels for example. While nobody expects there to be an actual group called The Death Panel there will in fact be an oversight group who will have the responsibility of rationing care in any public plan. HR 3200 already contains this board. You need only look to the UK or other places that have a single payer (the biggest misnomer in this entire discussion) system to see how healthcare is rationed. Palin made that issue a big focus. When Obama or any of the other Dems say this isn’t the case they are flat out lying. So who is being more responsible?

    Nobody is forcing anyone to take Palin seriously but many people are choosing to do so. It’s her right to speak and theirs to support her. Personally, I find Obama supporters a lot closer to the looney fringe than Palin’s.

  17. geoff Says:

    Ok, I ám out of here. I think you´re all lame.

    And we think you’re a fascist. And pretty incoherent.

    A pretty incoherent fascist.

  18. nicedeb Says:

    …who represents the US at our embassy in Spain. Blech.

  19. rogue1 Says:

    Deo….
    Ghost writer? How about Obama’s ghost thinkers? He can only pontificate what the Karaoke machine, aka telepromter, has told him to say.

  20. rogue1 Says:

    Deo???
    You know you didn’t wander away from this thread, you know you lurking & reading. Ha!!! typical. Cut & run.

  21. Betty Says:

    We are indeed fortunate to have people rated so highly in our embassy in Spain. Things should be better soon. Gasp.

  22. Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere Says:

    …who represents the US at our embassy in Spain. Blech.

    Deb, working for the State Department requires outstanding educational credentials and an elitist distain for the characteristics that make America the greatest country in the world. Its the latter that kept me from going that route, and when I did my internship in the Canadian House of Commons, the only people from our embassy we met who were not insufferably arrogant pricks were the marines guarding the place. I lost 45 minutes of my life in a meeting with the head US negotiator for NAFTA bloviating about what the Canadians were really like when we were actually working for them across the street. My single most satisfying moment of that summer was not meeting Jean Cretien, Kim Campbell, or Brian Mulroney. It was being seated in the galleries two rows closer to the main floor of the House of Commons than that negotiator when the Commons voted to ratify NAFTA…and having him recognize me.

  23. The Right Side of Life » @SarahPalinUSA: Obama Birth Certificate “Fair Question;” Campaign Lax on Vetting Says:

    [...] courtesy NiceDeb AKPC_IDS += "7631,";Popularity: unranked [?] SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "@SarahPalinUSA: Obama [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 158 other followers