No Matter The Outcome In MA Special Election, Obama Plans Scorched Earth Policy To Pass Obamacare

Gird your loins. The conventional wisdom on the evening talk shows has been that if Martha Coakley loses the special election in Massachusetts, tomorrow, Obamacare is dead.  But like some god-awful creature in a horror movie, it will not die, no matter how hard it’s hit. Obama will not let it:

President Barack Obama plans a combative response if, as White House aides fear, Democrats lose Tuesday’s special Senate election in Massachusetts, close advisers say.

“This is not a moment that causes the president or anybody who works for him to express any doubt,” a senior administration official said. “It more reinforces the conviction to fight hard.”

Even Bob Beckel on Hannity, tonight, thought that it would not be possible for the Dems to ram the bill through against the will of the people.

Yet that is precisely what Obama is hoping to do…

There won’t be any grand proclamation that “the era of Big Government is over” — the words President Bill Clinton uttered after Republicans won the Congress in the 1990s and he was forced to trim a once-ambitious agenda.

“The response will not be to do incremental things and try to salvage a few seats in the fall,” a presidential adviser said. “The best political route also happens to be the boldest rhetorical route, which is to go out and fight and let the chips fall where they may. We can say, ‘At least we fought for these things, and the Republicans said no.’”

It’s hard to comprehend how they can say it’s just “the Republicans”, when the healthcare bill is widely reviled, and the bluest state in the nation is on the verge of ‘saying no’.

An upset by Republican Scott Brown would be covered in many quarters as a repudiation of Obama, especially after Obama’s last-ditch campaign appearance with Coakley 36 hours before the polls opened.

But the president’s advisers plan to spin it as a validation of the underdog arguments that fueled Obama’s insurgent candidacy.

Obama…the underdog?! Against a Massachusetts Republican?!

“The painstaking campaign for change over two years in 2007 and 2008 has become a painstaking effort in the White House, too,” the official said. “The old habits of Washington aren’t going away easy.”

The White House rallying cry, according to one Obama confidant, will be, “Buckle up — let’s get some stuff done.”

These people are scary…and predictable:

More defensively, Obama advisers plan to argue that Coakley’s lackluster campaign contributed at least as much to the loss as the national environment.

“You can say it’s a rejection of the agenda,” a top Democrat said. “But it’s just as valid to say it’s frustration with the way things are going in the country and that people still want change.”

People want change, alright. But not in the direction these people think.

Hat tip: The Patriot Room

Tonight’s Coakley Rally In Framingham, MA: 3/4 Empty

More evidence of the enthusiasm gap just came in via Twitter:

It just ain’t happenin’ for her.

Game ovah!

Mass Resistance has pictures from Brown’s rally in Littleton, earlier,  today, which attracted hundreds  outside in the snow and ice.

Love this sign:

Mass Resistance also has pix up from a Sunday rally in Boston:

Which attracted a few feeble Obots. Why do I say Obots? Just look:

Someone was listening to Obama’s speech yesterday…but did she actually understand what she was hearing?

Now, we’ve recovered most of your money already, but I don’t think “most of your money” is good enough. We want all our money back. We’re going to collect every dime. (Applause.) That’s why I proposed a new fee on the largest financial firms — to pay the American people back for saving their skin.

What is the connection between a “new fee” and getting all our money back? Isn’t it great that we’ve got most of the money back, and isn’t it enough to get the rest the money back? Why the fee? To punish success? To my ears, it’s a non sequitur.

But instead of taking the side of working families in Massachusetts, Martha’s opponent is already walking in lockstep with Washington Republicans, opposing that fee, defending the same fat cats who are getting rewarded for their failure.

But you didn’t explain the fee. You’re demonizing the bankers — “fat cats” — the very people that you gave our tax money too. And how are they “getting rewarded for their failure” if the bailout worked? Why aren’t you pleased with the effective use of our tax money? It’s incoherent.

Now, there’s a big difference here. It gives you a sense of who the respective candidates are going to be fighting for, despite the rhetoric, despite the television ads, despite the truck. (Laughter.) Martha is going to make sure you get your money back. (Applause.)

Get our money back or impose that “new fee”? Scott Brown isn’t against getting the bailout money back, is he? This is deliberate obfuscation, it seems.

She’s got your back. Her opponent has got Wall Street’s back. (Applause.)

That sounds nicely slogan-y, but what does it mean? You can count on Democrats to be hostile to business? How is it defending us to attack Wall Street, and if it is, why did you give so much of our money to Wall Street?

UPDATE:

Pics from Scott Brown Election Eve Rally in Wrentham

The scene at 7:00 pm.

Full report at AoSHQ.

Oooh…Ow: Dem Apparatchik Makes Unfortunate Analogy

And the gaffes...they keep-a-comin’.

Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had THIS to say about Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat…

Van Hollen said Republican predictions that the political climate had changed so much that they can capture the 40 seats needed to regain control of the House was pure hallucination.

“Why would you hand the keys to the car back to the same guys whose policies drove the economy into the ditch and then walked away from the scene of the accident?” Van Hollen said. “For the Republicans to say vote for us and bring back the guys who got us into this mess in the first place, I don’t think it’s a winner.”

He said Democrats expect to see their majority shrink this year because the party that occupies the White House traditionally loses congressional seats in the first midterm election.

AWKWARD!

Someone is hallucinating here, and it ain’t the Republicans.

Someone jog my memory...did Republicans lose seats in Bush’s  first midterm election?

Hat tip: Weasel Zippers

BDS Meets PDS: John Kerry Combines Bush Derangement With Pick-Up Truck Derangement

The Coakley Camp loves to pile on Brown with anti-pick-up truck snarks. Do they have internal polling that shows  MA voters don’t trust pick up truck drivers? What’s the deal? I don’t understand what they’re doing, here, is this all they got?

Pundette caught this, from yesterday’s rally:

Senator John Kerry, man of the people, used his talents to warm up the crowd for Obama yesterday in Boston:

“I’ve got news for you, Scott: George Bush drove a truck, too, and look where it got us,” Sen. Kerry said, continuing to poke at the campaign ad. “I didn’t know it was a qualification for being in the Senate.”

George Bush drove a truck too? So what?

Check out this wicked shocka from the ’08 campaign:

*GASP!*

RELATED:

Don’t look now, but it looks like Kerry has been stricken with T-PDS, as well:

Sen. John Kerry: ‘Teabaggers’ are ‘revved up’.

MA Election Enthusiasm Gap: Coakley Phone Banks Empty

Barney Frank of all people frets that the race is about personalities:

“She let it become a personality contest and that was a mistake,” said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. “Some of us complained about it and we think it’s turned around.”

“We are in deep s— if we lose on Tuesday,” a Democratic operative said.

A new poll out of Public Policy Polling on Monday underscored the depth of Coakley’s challenge.

The poll showed Brown leading 51-46 overall, 64-32 among independents and winning 20 percent of the vote from those who backed Obama in 2008. On the flip side, the survey showed Coakley pulling just 4 percent of the vote from those who backed John McCain, in the 2008 presidential race.

And the poll reflected the enthusiasm gap from which Coakley suffers. Eighty percent of Brown supporters said they were “very excited” about Tuesday’s election, while only 60 percent of Coakley supporters felt the same way.

A Suffolk University/7News poll last week showed Brown leading 50-46 percent, with 57 percent viewing Brown favorably. Just 49 percent viewed Coakley favorably in that poll.

We are seeing this enthusiasm gap being played out in all sorts of strange ways, for examples; SEIU workers for Brown, Prius owners for Brown, Brown supporters out numbering Coakley supporters at Coakley rallies. Lifelong Dems are voting for the Republican in this race: “In all my years,” said the 85-year-old local, “I’ve never seen anything like this.”

And today, on the eve of the election, Coakley is having trouble getting volunteers to man her phone banks. Granted, mother nature isn’t cooperating:

Meanwhile, across the street at the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the holiday and a bitter winter storm have kept the crowds away from a phone bank for Democratic candidate Martha Coakley. As of 10:20 this morning, not a single volunteer had yet arrived for the 10am phone bank. MTA Webmaster Meg Secatore tells Watchdog.org that the severe snow and ice that have covered Massachusetts highways are keeping people from the phones.

Watch the video of the empty phone bank,  here.

Not all teachers have been staying indoors, however;

photo via Twitpic

Phone banks for Brown, however, are hopping.

A Message to ACORN and SEIU On the Eve of MA Special Election

From tea partiers on Twitter:

TO ALL OF OUR FRIENDS AT ACORN AND SEIU. . .

All the many tea partiers here on Twitter wanted to send you one final “shout-out” before the big election in Massachusetts on Tuesday.

AND we wanted to share with you the results of our little tweeting campaign we’ve been conducting over the past week.

As you know, we’ve been tweeting articles and You Tube videos to both the National and Massachusetts media throughout the past week. Our tweets were to Newspapers, TV and Radio.

BOY OH BOY, were people interested in what we had to say!

• Over 100,000 tweets were sent;

• Over 20,000 people viewed the articles and videos we sent out;

• One national and several Massachusetts news organizations told us they would be investigating both of your organization’s activities on election day;

• Nearly 3000 people have told us they’d be bringing video cameras to polling places just to video you and yours “having election day fun.” (You wouldn’t beleive where people told us they’d be hiding cameras!) Hmmmm. . . I wonder if any might be disenchanted members of your organizations?

Now, in light of all the attention all of you will be getting on Tuesday, we just wanted to give you some last minute advice:

1. ACORN and SEIU executives: you should wear your best suits, with a Red, White and Blue color scheme. Create that impression you are “All American”;

2. Be sure to wear your American Flag lapel pins;

3. For rank and file members, be sure you wear your Sunday-best SEIU and ACORN T-Shirts over your winter coats. And take time to iron them. It looks so much better on camera when you do.

4. Always SMILE! – You’ll never know when you might be on camera.

HAVE FUN ON ELECTION DAY!

Sincerely,
Tea Party Nation

Scenes From Obama’s Massachusetts Stump Speech

First, the hecklers: I haven’t seen Obama this rattled during a stump speech, since his teleprompter malfunctioned during the ’08 campaign.:

Allahpundit thought it was strange that he would be so rattled, but honestly…they were pretty loud and disruptive.  Plus, Obama’s speech was so perfunctory, and un-heartfelt, he was probably struggling to stay focused, as it was.

Here he is after recovering, claiming not to know anything about Brown, but insinuating that he hasn’t been “fighting for [the people of Massachusetts] up until now, but…”

Just the usual passive aggressive stuff we’ve come to expect from Obama, I’m kinda surprised ‘the finger’ didn’t make an appearance. And what’s with the anti-pick-up truck sneers? Are we supposed to be put off by pick up trucks, now? Are they analogous with {{{teabaggers}}}.

By the way, when a Democrat says “he’s fighting for you”, what he actually means is he’s creating new entitlements for you in order to buy your vote. Juan Williams says “Americans love entitlements”, and he says that like it’s a good thing.

RELATED:

Flopping Aces has pictures from the Brown rally, today. It appears that Brown drew more people than Obama did.

Indeed, the Obama rally wasn’t even filled to full capacity. I wonder how many people had to be bussed in?

UPDATE:

Last  PPP poll: Brown leads Coakley 51%- 46%.

But is it enough to make up for election night fraud?

More crazy/coo-coo/weird/dogs and cats sleeping together/SEIU members for Brown type stuff:

My Prius Is Voting for Scott Brown!

Game over, man!

UPDATE II:

Scott Brown hit back against Obama’s shocking anti-pick-up truck bias:

In a quip he repeated several times during a campaign appearance for Democrat Martha Coakley, Obama mocked the man who has been driving a pickup truck around the state, claiming he’s a “lockstep” Republican.

“So look, forget the ads, everybody can’t can slick ads. Forget the truck. Everyone can buy a truck.”

Brown took that opportunity to slam the president on government spending..

“Mr. President, unfortunately in this economy, not everybody can buy a truck,” Brown said in a statement. “My goal is to change that by cutting spending, lowering taxes and letting people keep more of their own money.”

Burrrrn!

Video: Mitch McConnell: MA Race A Referendum On Health Care Bill

The Democrats  want to have it both ways. If Coakley wins, it will be because of overwhelming support for the Obama agenda. If she loses, (and this one is looking increasingly difficult to steal), it will be because she ran a poor campaign.

She did, but that’s beside the point.

This is a referendum on the Obama agenda, and Americans, even in the “People’s Republic of Taxachusetts” are recoiling from it.

McConnell also said:

“I think the politics are toxic for the Democrats either way. This arrogant attempt to have the government take over one-sixth of the economy, on the heels of running banks, insurance companies, car companies, taking over the student loan business, doubling the national debt in five, tripling it in 10,” McConnell said. “You’ve got … sort of widespread public revulsion to this program.”

Obama’s chickens…are coming home to roost.

RELATED:

CALLING ALL LAWYERS…

Scott Brown needs you on election day.

About That Little Haitian Girl Trapped In The Rubble…

You read about her desperate plight at Hot Air…no equipment to remove the heavy rubble on top of her crushed leg, no blood supply to do an amputation…the eleven year old girl was crying out for her mother…they finally got her out…

*Deep, deep sigh*.

So much pain..so much heartache.

We do what we can. We donate, pray….cry. It’s okay to cry, too.

Here’s a tribute to the earthquake victims, via Lucianne:

Martha Coakey’s Outrageous, Over the Top Campaign Ads Draw Fire, Ridicule, Guffaws

Coakley’s Disgusting Rape Mailer is so over the top it almost looks like satire. Unfortunately, (for Coakley), it is just one more example out of many missteps taken by her campaign. It makes you wonder just who’s calling the shots at Martha Coakley’s campaign headquarters.

You can still vote for her most damaging gaffes, here.

In the meantime, laughter is the best medicine, and Iowahawk, a master of online chicanery, has opened up his comment section for submissions of 30 second Martha Coakley commercials.

He got the ball rolling with:

MAN
Say, I really like Scott Brown’s pickup truck. It’s wicked pissah!

WOMAN
Sure, Ted. If you like lynchings.

MAN
Whaddaya mean?

WOMAN
Just look at the record, Ted. From James Byrd to Matthew Shepard to the last scene in Easy Rider, pickup trucks are the official vehicles of Southern Republican lynch mobs. So are you still voting for Scott Brown?

MAN
No truckin’ way!

One of my faves in the comments:

[Sound of dolphins and laughing children]

V/O: If you are like most people, you love baby dolphins.

Martha Coakley: “I am Martha Coakley, and I love baby dolphins.”

V/O: After all, what kind of demonic, kitten-eating freak doesn’t love baby dolphins?

[Sound of maniacal laughing and chainsaws]

[Chainsaws and laughing fades...children sobbing...dolphins are heard no more]

V/O: Remember, every time someone votes for Scott Brown, a baby dolphin dies.

Mine:

(Voice over): Republican, Scott Brown has asked “outsiders” to come to Massachusetts to campaign for him in our state.

{{{Teabaggers}}}}

{{{Sarah palin}}}

{{{Yankee fans}}}

(Images of patriotic crowds, Sarah Palin, Yankees flash across the screen to Psycho shower scene chords).

These people have as much business in Massachusetts as a Republican has in Teddy Kennedy’s seat.

Scott Brown, Republican, thinks it’s “the people’s seat”.

Well, Scott Brown is entitled to his own opinions, but not to his own facts!

Brought to you by the SEIU, ACORN, HCAN, Working Families Party, NARAL, CPUSA.

Check out the rest at Iowahawk’s. It’s not too late to join the fun.

Hat Tip: Doug Ross @Journal

Ed Schultz On MA Senate Race: “I’d Cheat To Keep These Bastards Out”

I don’t care if this twerp is a long-time sufferer of “genius envy”. There’s no excuse for this kind of on- air stupidity:

Thanks for confirming what we already figured, you Alinskyite, Commie dirtbag, you. The fact that this type of thinking is so widespread among libs, is why so many Republicans no longer trust the integrity of our elections.

Hat tip: Christee Kelley via ExJon on Twitter

More Schultz idiocy at Weasel Zippers:

Ed Schultz Tries To Say Limbaugh Insulted Our Troops With His ‘Meals On Wheels’ Comment…Seriously, Watch The Clip And You’ll Want To Slap Ed Too

Puh-leez!

A fellow North Dakotan shares his knowledge of the maroon with Weasel’s commenters:

Folks, I live up here on the tundra of North Dakota – and it’s NO SECRET that Big Ed is a total LOON. Actually, we’re happy to share this resource with the rest of America – knowing that he’ll lead a high percentage of the Liberal-progressive lemmings over the cliff.

Ed has a LONG history of animosity against Rush. Before he was the ‘voice’ of the moonbat left, he was a ‘conservative’ radio talk show host in Fargo. He was very jealous that Rush made more money than himself, so he broke the relationship off. After that he was just a conservative talker, but folks got tired of his ranting insanity – so he became a ‘liberal’ talk show host, Air America promoter, etc. He started out his career as a sports commentator, but that ended with a fight in the stands with a fan – LOL He got a little upset when someone tossed a beer at him. LOL Someone should ask him why he shot his hunting dog, or does he beat on his 2nd wife like he did on his first. Yeah, he’s a real POS alright.

I’ve noticed that after the first couple of days, I don’t hear much about him running for Dorgans soon vacant Senate seat. LOL Even the Dems aren’t totally insane.

Posted by: TubeSteakEddy

Well, Duh

Why didn’t I think of this while the Hillbuzz Photoshop contest was still going on?

Obligatory, and better late than never…

The official: Scene-Stealing Squirrel and Reporter Get Decked By Coakley Staffer photoshop:

Previous sightings:

Sunday Silliness

Obama Rescues Economy!

New White House Party Crashers Photo Emerges

Sorry, Had To Be Done

Scene Stealing Squirrel Crashes ObamaCare Photo-op

Confirmed: White House Passed Out White Coats To Docs

Scene Stealing Pest Crashes MTV Video Music Awards

Scene Stealing Squirrel Crashes Obama’s Town Hall

Doomsday Clock Pushed Back One Minute: World Safer Now, Thanks To Obama

What a farce:

Scientists pushed back the hands on the symbolic Doomsday Clock by one minute citing hopeful developments in nuclear weapons and climate change.

The symbolic clock that shows how close mankind is to self-annihilation was moved back to six minutes before midnight from five minutes on Thursday.

I feel a lot safer, now, don’t you?

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, which maintains the clock and puts an illustration of it on its cover, attributed the move to efforts by world leaders to reduce their countries’ nuclear arsenals and collaborate on climate stabilization.

So who makes up this brain trust known as the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists?

The group, which includes 19 Nobel laureates, said a key to the “new era of cooperation is a change in the U.S. government’s orientation toward international affairs brought about in part by the election of (U.S. President Barack) Obama.”

Of course, fellow Nobel laureates, aka one world Utopians. In their vision of reality, if a person sets a goal to rid the world of nuclear weapons by kindly asking everyone to get rid of their nukes,  gets them to sign a piece of paper saying that they’ll get rid of their nukes, or at least think about getting rid of their nukes, we have made important progress and are one step closer to Utopia.

Tipped by Reeko of GI  Woodshop, who wanted to make the point that despite these Utopians’ delusional fantasies, since Obama has been elected, the world is not becoming safer at all. Quite the contrary:

…as ridiculous as them moving the clock back just because a President Obama exists… we must leave their rhetoric for just a bit and forget that they see the world through hopey-changey eyes. the truth is that the world has dangerously moved closer to a nuke holocaust. i made a bet last year that within a year or so, there WOULD be a nuclear incident (not accident) of either: atomic detonation, dirty bomb, or conventional explosive destruction and release of nuclear targets (such as blowing up a nuke in its place. re: the two AF officers recently caught removing safety devices from a silo).

i stand by my bet i made last year. unfortunately, it may be time to double down on it, or at least get serious about digging that bomb shelter in the back yard…

here’s just a few reasons…

the day before the Leftards moved their silly clock back, Dr. Massoud Ali Mohammadi was assassinated outside of his apartment in Tehran. according to reports in middle east and UK media:

“His colleagues at Tehran University claim that Mohammadi was not connected whatsoever with Iran’s nuclear program. However, precedent shows that Iranian universities, especially the chemistry and physics departments, have served as a front for Iran’s nuclear program. They have purchased and hid equipment, and their professors and experts have served as consultants for the program.” (Haaretz 13Jan10)

and from the GuardianUK:

“Last June, Shahram Amiri, a nuclear physicist at Malek Ashtar University in Tehran went on a pilgrimage to Mecca and never returned. Iran said he was seized, but according to many reports, he defected.
Vincent Cannistraro, former head of operations at the CIA’s counter-terrorism centre, said: “It is clear one of them, likely Amiri, is under a different identity living in the US and has been a major source of information. So it’s possible the guy just assassinated in Tehran was killed by the Iranians fearing he was one source on the programme revealed by the defector.”

so what dots need connecting here? the Pakistanian nuclear Dr. A.Q. Khan was promptly allowed to return back to business shortly after Obama won his magical election, and Al Queada we now know did succeed early in 09 to infiltrate at least two known Pak depositories of their nuke weapons. no known word from what was taken or damage done.
a few months later, N Korea set off its second “poof” bomb deep down in the bowels of a mine shaft that, according to most estimates, was only slightly higher yield than its 2006 first poof – this one being between 1 and 2 kt.

forget the missing Soviet suitcase bombs… A.Q. Khan in Pakistan has admitted to helping NK, Iran, Libya etc., although he “confessed” it only from 1989 to 2000. but Pak-Iran-NK nuke technology somehow keeps showing up. there is no doubt that A.Q. Khan and Dr. Massoud Mohammadi knew each other and were nuclear professional contemporaries.

any terrorist organization’s ultimate wet dream would be a “poof” bomb a.k.a. suitcase bomb, low yield, such as the NK tests, that have long been highly suspected of being Pakistanian (A.Q. Khan) developed technology.

even though both Iran and NK leader’s rhetoric is to simultaneously develop ICBM missiles for the same MAD scare tactics that the Cold War, and reap the rewards of joining those superpower clubs, the reality is much, much worse… they are instead developing low-yield “poof” bombs, that are highly portable, hard to detect, and easy to deploy.

the scenario that TV viewers saw on “24″ a few seasons ago of a “suitcase” bomb taking out LA has only become far, far more real THIS year.

the Leftards at the “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists” are the same ilk as CRU East Anglia and the UN IPCC. global warming? how bout some nuclear winter to cool it off? *snark*

Previously:

Nuclear Proliferator A.Q. Khan Now A Free Man – No Restrictions On Movement

Obama’s Coakley Endorsement Remixed

No one’s buying it anymore, comrade. We’ve seen too much:

Video via Weasel Zippers

Latest internal polls ( his and hers) are showing a blowout for Brown. He has all the momentum, and all the excitement on his side. Coakley continues to commit embarrassing gaffes, and the unpopular President is heading for Massachusetts on Sunday to stump for her….

What could go wrong?

UPDATE:

See? I’m not the only one worrying.

Black Panther Malik Z. Shabazz Hits Back At Republican Critics

Shabazz said, one of the members of the party in Philadelphia,“just happened to be a little too black or too strong” and “made a mistake” by bringing a weapon to the polls.

Photo via Newsbusters

As the Justice department stonewalls inquiries into the voter intimidation case, as documented by , Jennifer Rubin, and  The Washington Times,  GOP Rep. Frank Wolf  continues to press for answers.

As part of his ongoing effort to get answers as to why the Justice Department dismissed a voter intimidation case in Philadelphia involving members of the New Black Panther Party, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-10th) today announced that he has introduced a measure that would require the House Judiciary Committee to deal with the issue.

Wolf also announced that he had language inserted in the annual spending bill that funds the Justice Department requiring that its Office of Professional Responsibility provide the results of the investigation it is conducting surrounding the dismissal the case to the House Appropriations Committee. Wolf, the top Republican on the Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations subcommittee, and Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, requested the investigation earlier this year.

New Black Panther Party president, and Obama supporter,  Malik Zulu Shabazz hit back with an unhinged rant aimed at those House Republicans, and “Uncle Tom” and “black negro”, Michael Steele:

“These right-wing white, red-faced, red-neck Republicans are attacking the hell out of the New Black Panther Party, and we’re organizing now to fight back,” Shabazz told the podcast host, a man who calls himself “Brother Gary” and hosts a show called Conscious Chats on Blogtalk Radio.

Shabazz singled out GOP Reps. Frank Wolf (Va.) and Lamar Smith (Texas) — two critics on the House Judiciary Committee — along with “Old Uncle Tom, Michael Steele, the black Negro who heads the Republican National Committee.”

“We gearing up for a showdown with this cracker,” Shabazz said, although it wasn’t clear to whom he was referring. “He keep talking – we going to Capitol Hill, we’re just gearing up right now, we’ll go to Capitol Hill.”

Why has this man not been given a position in the Obama administration, yet? Race relations Czar, perhaps?

Hat tip: Weasel Zippers

Previously:

Is Obama’s legal team imploding due to New Black Panther voter intimidation case?

Why Would The DOJ Dismiss The Charges Against The New Black Panthers?

Voter Fraud/Intimidation Reports

The My Barack Obama Community Blograge

Radicals, Terrorists And Tyrants Of The World Root For Obama

New Black Panther Party Endorses Obama