They said that if we elected Obama, “the One”, “The Lightworker”, the “post racial” candidate, racial divisions would be healed in this country. If Obama had truly been “post racial”, or colorblind, he could have indeed contributed significantly toward that goal. But that’s not what’s happened and that’s not really what the left desires. Racial divisions are actually encouraged and used as a sledgehammer to further their goal of tearing down an economic structure that favors people who work hard and play by the rules, so they can replace it with their decrepit and immoral system of “redistributive change”, which insists not on equal opportunities, but on equal outcomes.
This type of “equality” calls for some people to have more rights than others. Those other people, (the lighter hued ones), have benefited from hundreds of years of privilege, at the expense of others, so now it’s payback time. Literally. They will actually say that….as J. Christian Adams, the whistleblower recounts in his oped in The Washington Times: Inside the Black Panther case.
Some of my co-workers argued that the law should not be used against black wrongdoers because of the long history of slavery and segregation. Less charitable individuals called it “payback time.” Incredibly, after the case was dismissed, instructions were given that no more cases against racial minorities like the Black Panther case would be brought by the Voting Section.
These are people who would probably shine, working for liberal think tanks, as token Marxist professors, blogging for Daily Kos, or being your friendly neighborhood Walmart greeters…..but in a sane world, they would have no business working for the United States Department of Justice. Yet, there they are…in the Obama DOJ, their unconstitutional ideas for reparative justice, are just what the doctor ordered.
On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. I and other Justice attorneys diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case.
The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.
What happens when all the good men at the DOJ are gone?
Based on my firsthand experiences, I believe the dismissal of the Black Panther case was motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law. Others still within the department share my assessment. The department abetted wrongdoers and abandoned law-abiding citizens victimized by the New Black Panthers. The dismissal raises serious questions about the department’s enforcement neutrality in upcoming midterm elections and the subsequent 2012 presidential election.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has opened an investigation into the dismissal and the DOJ’s skewed enforcement priorities. Attorneys who brought the case are under subpoena to testify, but the department ordered us to ignore the subpoena, lawlessly placing us in an unacceptable legal limbo.
The assistant attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez, has testified repeatedly that the “facts and law” did not support this case. That claim is false. If the actions in Philadelphia do not constitute voter intimidation, it is hard to imagine what would, short of an actual outbreak of violence at the polls. Let’s all hope this administration has not invited that outcome through the corrupt dismissal.
Most corrupt of all, the lawyers who ordered the dismissal – Loretta King, the Obama-appointed acting head of the Civil Rights Division, and Steve Rosenbaum – did not even read the internal Justice Department memorandums supporting the case and investigation. Just as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. admitted that he did not read the Arizona immigration law before he condemned it, Mr. Rosenbaum admitted that he had not bothered to read the most important department documents detailing the investigative facts and applicable law in the New Black Panther case. Christopher Coates, the former Voting Section chief, was so outraged at this dereliction of responsibility that he actually threw the memos at Mr. Rosenbaum in the meeting where they were discussing the dismissal of the case. The department subsequently removed all of Mr. Coates’ responsibilities and sent him to South Carolina.
Read the whole thing.
PJTV: Rocking the Vote: Did DOJ Try to Whitewash Black Panther Intimidation Case?
J. Christian Adams: You Deserve To Know — Unequal Law Enforcement Reigns at Obama’s DOJ (PJM Exclusive)