How Can There Be 86,000 Racial Discrimination Claims In The Pigford vs Glickman Case When There Are Only 39,697 total Black farmers?

I wonder if Breitbart knew what a can of worms he was opening when he posted that edited Shirley Sherrod video? Because the more we look at her and her husband,  that 13 million settlement she got just prior to being hired by the USDA, and the multi-billion Pigford vs Glickman class action settlement, the more disgusted and suspicious we get. The settlement is starting to look more like a boondoggle, or worse yet, reparations.

Zombie, did a little  snooping and found more questions than answers:

Pigford v. Glickman

…on February 23 of this year, the USDA finally consented to pay $1.25 billion to those farmers whose claims had earlier been denied:

In the 1999 case Pigford v. Glickman, the USDA agreed to pay 16,000 black farmers $1 billion after a judge held the federal government responsible for the decline in black farmers. Critics argued that more than 70,000 farmers were shut out of the lawsuit. In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama and Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley got a law passed to reopen the case, and the settlement talks moved forward.

The $1.25 billion settlement, announced Thursday, comes on top of the money paid out a decade ago. The new agreement would provide cash payments and debt relief to farmers who applied too late to participate in the earlier settlement, The Washington Post reported. Authorities say they are not certain how many farmers might apply this time, but analysts say the number could be higher than 70,000.

Seventy-thousand+ applicants in addition to the 16,000 already compensated now means that over 86,000 people are slated to be paid.

What I want to know is: How can there be 86,000 legitimate
claimants?

The Census pinpoints the precise number of African-American
farmers

I ask this question because it didn’t take me very long to find the
latest census statistics released by the Department of Agriculture,
which can be found linked to from this official USDA page. There, you will find this direct link to a text version of the Census report,
and this recommended pdf version.

In the pdf version of the government’s official 2007 Agricultural
Census, Table 53 on page 646 shows that there are exactly 39,697
African-American farmers grand total in the entire nation.

Moreover, another Dept. of Agriculture census report gives the total number of black farmers in 1992, the time of the Pigford vs Glickman lawsuit:

and it reveals that there were far fewer back then than there were in 2007. According to the chart on page 20 of the USDA’s pdf 1998 “Status Report, Minority & Women Farmers In the U.S.”, there were only 18,816 black farmers in 1992.

Zombie has the full report at Pajamas Media, complete with charts and whatnot…

So what the bleep is going on, here? Inquiring minds want to know.

Related:

Dick Morris: RACIAL POLITICS BLOWS UP IN OBAMA’S FACE




Share

About these ads

11 Responses to “How Can There Be 86,000 Racial Discrimination Claims In The Pigford vs Glickman Case When There Are Only 39,697 total Black farmers?”

  1. Sherrod To Sue Breitbart « Nice Deb Says:

    [...] question: Given the fact that the new media is now sniffing around that Pigford v Glickman case, wouldn’t you think there are some Bureaucrats at the USDA sort of  wishing this woman would [...]

    Like

  2. More Racism: Shirley Sherrod’s Husband Charles Endorses Black Separatism in Speech (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone Says:

    [...] NAACP Audience Federal Employees Don’t Get Fired, and How She Treated a White Farmer Nice Deb: How Can There Be 86,000 Racial Discrimination Claims In The Pigford vs Glickman Case When There Are … and Video: NAACP’s Washington Director Caught in Lies About Tea Party… and The NAACP Attacks [...]

    Like

  3. waynekspear Says:

    “Under the consent decree, an eligible recipient is an African American who (1) farmed or attempted to farm between January 1981 and December 31, 1996, (2) applied to USDA for farm credit or program benefits and believes that he or she was discriminated against by the USDA on the basis of race, and (3) made a complaint against the USDA on or before July 1, 1997.”

    Perhaps the “attempted to farm” clause answers this question. See – http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS20430.pdf

    Like

  4. Tom Downs Says:

    Uh, I think the government left out on the first go around those farmers growing weed as a crop. The g-men screwed up again!

    Like

  5. JordanMardan Says:

    There may be 39,697 today…..BUT HOW MANY LOST THEIR FARMS DECADES AGO AS A RESULT OF THE DISCRIMINATION IN GETTING LOANS?!

    In other words, how many former Black farmers are either dead or currently engaged in another occupation or retired?!

    Using the “latest U.S. Census” data is bogus…because it does not include the farmers who lost their land, those who have died, etc.

    MOST IMPORTANTLY, since Blacks are often under-counted in the Census, this further invalidates this article.

    Only a fool would accept this article as being truthful.

    Like

  6. nicedeb Says:

    ???

    There are more black farmers today than there were in 1992 at the time of the Pigman vs Glickman lawsuit:18,816. So the numbers are increasing.

    People are right to smell a rat with the 86,000 claimants.

    Like

  7. CARL E MOSS Says:

    I WOULD LIKE TO NO DO I STILL HAVE A TRACKING NUMBER AN HOW CAN I FIND IT

    Like

  8. tameka davis Says:

    my grandmom annie luehairston had a tracking number but she is dead now and we cant find it,how do we find it

    Like

  9. e l carpenter Says:

    In reference to farmers that would have included in class action settlement for pigford vs glickman, but are deceased, are living children, or grsndchildren eligible for this compensation? We must admit that that. This. Type. Of discrimstory practice had to affect current and future generations
    Economically,emtionally, in areas of self esteem, and ability to provide for their family as other men were.

    Like

  10. alwaysfiredup Says:

    Supposedly all you have to provide is an affidavit from a family member stating you applied for a USDA loan and were turned down. USDA has no records of such applications so there’s nothing to crosscheck–fill out an affidavit, get $50,000. And dead people (i.e., children and grandchildren) should not be eligible; tort claims die with the plaintiff.

    A lot of Americans saw their dreams crushed over America’s history. We don’t pay people for life being unfair and we don’t hold people’s descendants accountable for their ancestors’ sins. It’s time to move on.

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,677,740 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 544 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: