Monday Quick Links

Cartoon via Theo Spark

Required reading for today:

Ed Lasky at the American Thinker: Obama’s War on Chris Christie:

Anyone who has spent any time studying Barack Obama’s background, knows that he’s not just any garden variety liberal.  He’s a ruthless far-left ideologue who exerts more energy fighting political opponents than the nation’s real enemies. His latest target, NJ Conservative superstar, Chris Christie, has already faced an attack from the DOJ, and now, has been targeted by Ray Lahood’s department of Transportation. Lasky takes us on a trip down memory lane, to illustrate why Christie should be bracing for more aggression from the Obama administration.

***

James Delingpole at The Telegraph has some fun at warmists’ expense: Brrrrr! It’s the Warmest Year Ever!

Trevor Loudon on who stands to benefit most from the wikileaks fiasco: Socialists Motivated by Wikileaks – “It is Time to Tear Down the Empire”

From the department of DUH at Hot Air: New Fed study suggests net job creation from Porkulus was … zero

One of the more flamboyant clowns in the Dems’ clown car demonstrates for all to see, why he was just thrown out of office. The Blog Prof :Video: Alan Grayson (D-eranged) goes out in Style

***

Who wants to see Kathy Griffin lustily booed by a room full of  American troops for hating on Bristol Palin? See Mediaite for the video: Kathy Griffin Gets Booed By U.S. Troops After Calling Bristol Palin Fat

Michelle Malkin offers a compare and contrast: How far USO “entertainment” has fallen

Somebody’s head should be rolling at VH1 for thinking that Griffin was an appropriate choice to MC a tribute to America’s fighting men and women.

***

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy: Hot Air: DREAM Act turning into nightmare for Reid

All together now…Awwwww!

Newsbusters has more from the Dept. of duh (for everyone but liberals): Kyl Repeatedly Corrects Schieffer: No Tax ‘Cuts’ for Rich, Just Extending Existing Rates; Schieffer: ‘I Gotcha’

“Existing tax rates, as Kyl likes to call them…”
Or as anyone not interested in soak-the-rich demagoguery likes to call them.
***
Everything you ever wanted to know about START via Andrew McCarty at NRO: Missile Malpractice
***

***

Pundette’s “must-read” of the day: Stanley Kurtz on the speech police

We’re still not allowed to call Obama a Socialist?  Oh, please.

***

Uh-oh:

NY daily News: WikiLeaks reveals list of international facilities & resources ‘vital’ to U.S.

***
Must-see at Right Network: Big Fur Hat’s Big Book of Bird Brains
Descriptions of  endangered species provided by the inimitable Gerard Van der Leun.

***


Too bad, Palin wasn’t around when grandma got run over by that reindeer….the tragedy could have been prevented :
-
-

Share

CA Lifestyles of the Rich and Pensioned

The creator of this amusing parody about California’s outlandish public employee pensions, got his/her inspiration from the “Downfall” parodies:

Video via Jane Jamison, who has much more to say about the issue at Uncoverage.

Did you know:

California’s pension system – the largest in the nation – is some $59.5 billion shy of what it has promised to pay, and that may be the good news, according to the Pew Center on the States. The health benefits that California has guaranteed its retirees? That’s almost completely unfunded – a $62. 5 billion problem.


 

Share

Gingrich and Bolton Slam Obama Administration For Wikileaks Fiasco

Newt Gingrich had harsh words for the Obama administration in reference to the Wikileaks fiasco, calling them, “shallow”, and amateurish”, this morning on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace.

Via The Hill’s Blog briefing Room:

Gingrich said the leaks are “a scandal of the first order” and that they demonstrate the Obama administration is “shallow” and “amateurish” when it comes to national security.

“You have a private first class who downloads a quarter million documents, and the system doesn’t say, ‘Oh, you may be over extended?’ I mean, this is a system so stupid that it ought to be a scandal of the first order,” Gingrich said. “This administration is so shallow and so amateurish about national security that it is painful and dangerous.”

He also said the U.S needs to act fast in shutting down WikiLeaks and finding Julian Assange.

While Gingrich questioned why such a thing was allowed to happen, John Bolton attacked the administration on another front in his oped, today, in The Guardian:

WikiLeaks has yet again flooded the internet with thousands of classified American documents, this time state department cables. More troubling than WikiLeaks’ latest revelation of US secrets, however, is the Obama administration’s weak, wrong-headed and erratic response. Unfortunately, the administration has acted consistently with its demonstrated unwillingness to assert and defend US interests across a wide range of threats, such as Iran and North Korea, which, ironically, the leaked cables amply document.

***

This sustained, collective inaction exemplifies the Obama administration’s all-too-common attitude towards threats to America’s international interests. The president, unlike the long line of his predecessors since Franklin Roosevelt, simply does not put national security at the centre of his political priorities. Thus, Europeans who welcomed Obama to the Oval Office should reflect on his Warren Harding-like interest in foreign policy. Europeans who believe they will never again face real security threats to their comfortable lifestyle should realise that if by chance one occurs during this administration, the president will be otherwise occupied. He will be continuing his efforts to restructure the US economy, and does not wish to be distracted by foreign affairs.

Sadly, I think the ‘stache has it right. The “international community” had better hope and pray that their lands are not threatened with hostilities until after 2012.

RELATED:

Gingrich says he’s more inclined than not to run

UFO ‘references’ in unreleased cables: WikiLeaks

Confidential U.S. files mention alien life, Julian Assange says…

MORE:

Nile Gardiner gives his view of the Wikileaks situation at The Telegraph:

…there can be no doubt that Wikileaks will make the Secretary of State’s job far harder now, and will be a huge drain on the energy of the former senator from New York. She has become the public face of the Wikileaks fiasco on the world stage, and will likely remain so, as the official ultimately responsible for America’s vast diplomatic corps. And the White House has been happy to keep it that way. The president has strikingly avoided making any comment on this latest leak, the third this year, and kept his distance from what is a huge embarrassment for his administration. In fact, over Wikileaks, Barack Obama has proved as elusive as the Scarlet Pimpernel.

America’s international diplomacy has taken a massive hit in the past few days, which may take many years as well as new leadership in the White House to fully repair. And the Obama administration must carry a great deal of the blame for allowing the leaks to happen in the first place, failing to halt them once they had started, and doing nothing to bring Julian Assange to justice.

Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker weighs in: Hillary’s Long Goodbye:

While I welcome a primary challenge to President Obama from his own party, I actually feared a successful challenge by Hillary, because she could potentially win the presidency, a nightmare for those of us who closely observed her behavior over the years, starting with her role in the Watergate Committee, arguing that Richard Nixon should be denied access to legal counsel. She is ruthless, unprincipled, and far better grounded than Obama, and would be much more effective in taking America to the left than her husband was.

Despite my unwillingness to take a sigh of relief, secure in the knowledge that the threat of President Rodham Clinton is over, I am beginning to believe that the damage she has sustained in the WikiLeaks affair is insurmountable.

I wouldn’t count her out just yet, nor would I believe her assertions about leaving politics to do “advocacy work”. Lefties have an uncanny ability to come back from political death because their amoral supporters have no standards, and will let them get away with anything.

Linked by Michelle Malkin, and Doug Ross, thanks!

Share

Your Sunday Hymn: Creator Of The Stars Of Night

It was hard to choose among the many arrangements of this traditional advent hymn on YouTube…until I found the boys choir, Libera’s version. Their rendition of “Creator of the stars of night” – Sempiterna, wins hands down:

 

 

Share

Saturday Evening Cinema

Via Breitbart TV, I bring you, Climate Bureaucrats Gone Wild, produced by those Gaia haters at Americans For Prosperity!:

Here’s a cute Charles Krauthammer mash-up, “Charles is Right!”:

In case you missed it, yesterday, Allahpundit posted part one of this uproarious KWHL interview with Bristol Palin.  The radio hosts have fun flaming Keith (what-a-dick) Olbermann, while Bristol laughs along . Part 2, via Barbaric Thoughts, features  John Zigler, who calls in to lob some additional bombs.

Every conversation you’ve ever had with a lib, summed up, here: Meet The Liberal Elite, via iOWNTHEWORLD:

What is this—-WHY is this?

Part 2 is at Hot Air, for you masochists out there. Allahpundit should be shunned from polite society for inflicting that on the rightwing blogosphere – who’s with me?


Share

Tax Hikes Die On Senate Floor

Nice to see that our guys aren’t buckling in the face of all the class warfare demagoguery coming at them.

Senate Republicans blocked legislation Saturday to let upper-income tax cuts expire on Jan. 1, a showdown scripted by Democrats eager to showcase GOP lawmakers as defenders of millionaires.

“Do we want to extend those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires at a time of huge deficits. I would argue vociferously we shouldn’t,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., shortly before the votes.

Republicans countered that no taxes should be raised at a time the economy is recovering from a recession. “It is the most astounding theory I have ever seen, raise taxes to create jobs,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.

Both measures would have extended expiring cuts for the middle class.

See Michelle Malkin for her report on the Dem Socialists’ revolting hypocrisy: For class-warfare Dems: A reminder about who “the rich” are; Update: Senate Dems’ demagoguery rejected.

See also:  Hot Air: Senate tax bills die on floor.

Doug Powers asks: How High Does the Unemployment Rate Have to Get Before Dems Re-Think Tax Hikes?

They either see no correlation between their policies and the unemployment rate, or they don’t care. It’s hard to tell. But liberals are notoriously weak when it comes to understanding basic economics.

Meanwhile, as Gateway Pundit reports, Dems are continuing their economy-crushing, lame-duck shenanigans, unabated:

Looks like Harry Reid wants to play the part of the Grinch, this Christmas, too.

MORE:

From David Bossie of Citizen’s United via Big Government:

At Citizens United we have released a new web ad to drive home the point that President Obama is out of touch and miles away from reality.  Please share with family and friends.



Share

White House Christmas Trees Through The Years

While I was looking for pictures of the 2010 White House Christmas tree at Google images, I was bombarded by White House Christmas trees from years past, and that gave me the idea to do a photo essay of White House Christmas trees.

Franklin Pierce was the first President to have a White House Christmas tree.

Pierce’s 1856 Christmas tree in the White House was put up for the enjoyment of the Sunday School students from the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church in Washington.

The first Christmas tree put up for the joy of a president’s immediate family was in 1889 during the administration of Benjamin Harrison.

The earliest White House Christmas tree I was able to find a picture of was the Cleveland family’s Christmas tree:

Cleveland family Christmas tree in the family room and library (today the Yellow Oval Room), ca. 1895.

Beginning with the Harrisons, it became customary to have a Christmas tree in the White House. However, the tradition did not sit well with ardent conservationist Theodore Roosevelt, who was president from September 1901 to March 1909. He thought that the cutting down of trees for use at Christmas led to deforestation.

Though Roosevelt forbade Christmas trees in the White House, one Christmas two of his sons secretly brought in a tree and hid it in a closet. Division of Forestry chief Gifford Pinchot, a dedicated conservationist and Roosevelt confidant, defended the cutting down of trees for Christmas. Pinchot argued that doing so helped thin the forests. Roosevelt was not won over.

After that first Christmas tree made its way into the Roosevelt White House, the president let his son Archie put up a holiday tree annually in his room. However, the White House tried to keep this fact from appearing in the newspapers.

Not surprisingly, I could find no pictures of the  Roosevelt’s Christmas trees.

The New York Times reported on Christmas day, 1912: XMAS TREE IN BLUE ROOM.; Miss Helen Taft’s Guvenile Party an Innovation in White House.

WASHINGTON, Dec. 25. — With the President and Mrs. Taft at Panama, their son and daughter established a new precedent at the White House in the way of a Christmas party to-night. A large and gracefully proportioned fir tree had been put in place in the Blue Room, which in all White House History has never before known a decoration of this kind.
I would never have guessed that the abbreviation, “XMAS” was in use back in the early 1900′s. And I love the quaint spelling of, “juvenile”.
-
-

Meet The Parents

The most unpardonable sin in society is independence of thought. – Emma Goldman

Having already been raised by parents, I am increasingly resentful of a government that continues to substitute its judgment for my own, justifies its temerity in doing so by deigning to tell me it is for my own good, and then charging me exorbitantly for it.  And it happens at all levels of government, from the overreaching leviathan in the District of Columbia, to the irresponsible spendthrifts in Olympia, to the bold petty tyrants here in my own county.

What’s that?  I’m being ridiculous?  I don’t think so.  Let’s start with this example from the Tacoma News Tribune:

The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department this morning released a press statement saying that El Gaucho Tacoma has agreed to a permanent injunction that bans smoking in its facility.

Agreed to?  More like got tired spending the money to try to be able to enforce their property rights.
 

“We see this as an important step for the health of Washington State residents, most of whom don’t smoke, and who overwhelmingly voted to approve Washington’s Smoking in Public Places Act,” stated Anthony Chen, department director. 

I see this as an abuse of power, of the kind that bureaucrats in county public health systems, and other local agencies and bureaus love to engage in…for our own good, of course.

 
Earlier this year the department sued to close the smoking lounge, which had recently opened after renovations that owner Paul Mackay said he believed satisfied restrictions in the state’s 2005 non-smoking law.

A smoking lounge.  Not a lounge where they simply permitted smoking.  A lounge designed specifically for smoking.  [While this squib doesn't have all the details, the lounge was completely separate from the rest of the restaurant, had state-of-the-art ventilation systems, and even a separate entrance.]  This wasn’t about a restaurant that some whiney non-smokers could not frequent because of owners who couldn’t manage to offer a non-smoking alternative, because the restaurant is non-smoking, and as I said, separate from the smoking lounge. 

“When the owners failed to comply with several requests, and a letter of compliance from the Health Department, they were served with an injunction to stop allowing smoking in the lounge. On April 23, 2010 a Pierce County Superior Court issued a preliminary injunction against El Gaucho Tacoma and the VIP Lounge,” the department said.

To translate from the power-grubbing bureaucratese “This uppity property owner had the nerve to try to allow patrons to engage in a legal activity in a way that would not disturb those who frequented his establishment, but did not smoke, but he didn’t come, hat in hand, to ask our permission first, and that had to be dealt with.”

I would have liked to see Mackay do an end run and open a private club in the location occupied by the smoking lounge…the kind where anyone can be issued a membership card at the door for a nominal fee.  A private club is not a public place, and therefore the county health department nannycrats can get bent.  But knowing how one little birdie can make a phone call to another little birdie, and the next thing you know, converting the liquor license from a restaurant to a private club can end up being fraught with all sorts of …difficulties, especially with things like the approvals from the local authorities.  I imagine that this was the better business decision for Mr. Mackay.

As for the over-reaching in Olympia, I have the following agenda items in Governor Gregoire’s State of the State address from this past January:

“For all of us who are called to public service, now is the time for leadership. Now is the most important time to serve,” Gregoire said. “For as difficult and challenging as the decisions that lie ahead of us will be, now is the time to be decisive, and now is the time for compassion. It’s the time to make a real difference for people. It’s the time to truly shape the future of Washington state.”

———————————————————————————

*High-quality health care: Gregoire asked the Legislature to consider restoring funding for the state’s Basic Health Plan, hospice services and maternity care for at-risk mothers.

———————————————————————————

“The December budget I presented was balanced, and it certainly sets new, and admittedly untenable, policy directions,” Gregoire said. “But the balanced budget also would force us to abandon the values that define this state — fairness and compassion. It would be unjust, unwise and unfair to abandon our friends and neighbors when they need us most.”

Now, leadership is not continuing to fund entitlements when you are having trouble doing the things that you’re actually supposed to be doing.  Since this speech, our budget hole in this state has increased more than $5 Billion.  The response was to issue a whole lot of new taxes in a down economy, so Nanny Government could continue to make decisions for and offer entitlements to its dependents, rather than focusing on the things that really are its job:  law enforcement, funding schools, fixing the roads, and other basic government functions.  And when she starts whining about not meeting “basic Washington values” because I’m not reducing the quality of health care I provide for my family because they aren’t compelling me to pay for it for someone else, it takes all that I have not to start shouting “THERE IS NO FAIRNESS IN TAKING WHAT I WORK FOR IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR MYSELF AND MY FAMILY SO YOU CAN GIVE IT TO SOMEONE ELSE!  MAKING PEOPLE DEPENDENT UPON GOVERNMENT IS NOT “COMPASSIONATE”!  QUIT CONFUSING YOUR ABILITY TO BUY VOTES WITH MY MONEY WITH BEING “COMPASSIONATE’!!!”

When some of the new taxes the legislature tried to impose to continue being generous with my earnings ended up on the initiative ballots in November, and going down in flames, it was like Christmas came early.  The problem is, the politicians in this state continually have a problem understanding that when the voters say “No!” to their taxes, we really mean it.  Just ask anyone in Pierce, King, or Snohomish county about their thirty dollar license tabs for their car.  My last one only cost me $120, because I get to “give” generously to subsidize public transit that no one rides.  However, I am very pleased that there are bus drivers who make in excess of $100,000.00 a year when I have the equivalent of a masters and a doctorate in a real discipline, and make less.  To borrow a line from our Dear President, these employees of ours should be thanking me.  Especially when they can expect raises this year, even though I haven’t seen one in a few years now.  It is rumored that the governor will recall the legislature to a special session, which, if it like the prior special sessions, means that the Democrats will leave Republicans out of the meetings, decide that they cannot possibly make any cuts to entitlements, and instead, will pass legislation that will raise taxes instead.  I think you can probably make book on it.

And then there is the Federal Government’s assumption of authority it does not have, by which it substitutes its judgment for your own.  Case in point?  FCC Commissioner Michael Copps:

“I think American media has a bad case of substance abuse right now. We are not producing the body of news and information that democracy needs to conduct its civic dialogue. We aren’t producing as much news as we did 5 years, 10 years, 15 years ago. We have to reverse that trend or I think we are going to be pretty close to be denying our citizens the essential news and information that they need to have in order to make intelligent decisions about the future direction of their country.”

Not to press a point too finely, but who the Hell appointed him to judge the quality of the news being reported?  No, really.  Last I looked, the federal government didn’t have a “Ministry of Information” to decide what is, and what is not news, or even good reporting.  In fact, I’m pretty sure that’s our job, and I don’t recall any ceremonies where the American people formally surrendered this right to some stinkfaced bureaucrat who doesn’t like what he hears on CNN or FOX.  In fact, since the retirement of the so-called Fairness Doctrine back when we still had more than a handful of sensible people in the government, I thought that the whole point was to let the people decide with their viewership, their listening, and what news outlets they chose to spend their money on.  That is why the Old Grey Lady is in the tank; once people had a chance to decide for themselves, the outlets that only told the stories they wanted you to read/hear/see, and in the manner that they wanted you to ingest simply could no longer compete.  The approved lies, mischaracterizations, and spin were no longer palatable.  And yet this kaikocracy is intent on squelching any message it doesn’t approve of.  That is why The Chicago Messiah™ and his flunkies, toadies, and watercarriers are constantly contributing to the ambient noise level with their insistence that FOX is “bad for the republic”.

“Nowadays, when stations are so often owned by mega companies and absentee owners hundreds or even thousands of miles away — frequently by private equity firms totally unschooled in public interest media — we no longer ask licensees to take the public pulse. Diversity of programming suffers, minorities are ignored, and local self-expression becomes the exception.”

Diversity?  The opinion of a few numb-skulled Supreme Court Justices aside, the federal government, or any government  for that matter, has absolutely no interest, compelling or otherwise, in diversity.  Diversity did not enrich the lives of the people of the Balkans.  It did not make their lives better.  It did not provide a rich society, and preserve basic human dignities and rights of its citizens.  Instead, it brought strife, war, death, misery, and chaos.

“Diversity” as it is currently embraced by too many in government, is destructive to society.  It substitutes identity for merit.  It purposely divides, and keeps divided the people of a nation.   It doesn’t reward and encourage exceptionalism for its own sake (and the blessings to society as a whole that come from such a strategy).  It discourages a national identity, character, and vision, and fosters tribalism and territorial battles in culture, the allocation of resources, and in the defining of goals.  Its final end will be devolution in to discord and violence, rather than achievement and excellence.

Last I looked, local self-expression wasn’t really an issue.  Public television has local outlets, many of which carry locally produced and broadcast programs.  Radio stations report local news, and many carry locally produced programs.  Cable television has public access shows.  And the internet makes anyone with something to say and the ability to find any of several free blog hosts, a one-person publisher.

Let’s not kid ourselves.  Increasingly, we are met in all walks of life by government in all its varied forms that refuses to remain within the strict confines we have set forth for it.  Its appetite for control is rapacious, and unquenchable.  We yield every day, in venues where the government simply has no business being in our business.  Mandates to ban incandescent lightbulbs.  Telling business owners that they cannot cater exclusively to smoking patrons.  Refusing to stop buying votes from its dependents with our money, and ignoring us when we tell them that they cannot have more of what we earn.  Forcing societal schemes upon us that will not, and by their very nature, cannot benefit society.  Fiats that turn social values on their heads by unelected jurists and bureaucrats, when the people have very clearly refused such measures sought to be undertaken by elected officials, and the craven collaboration between the cowardly elected officials and the unelected functionaries who in the absence of any mechanism of accountability to “We the People”, eagerly dictate to us that which we have already refused…for our own good, of course.

What I’d like to know is if I, at age 39, 21 years free of the authority of my parents, and having earned a high school diploma, a B.A., a J.D., and an LL.M., and having been a parent myself for over 11 years still haven’t earned the right, and am not smart enough to make my own decisions, what makes those busybody bureaucrats, many of them the same age or younger, and some less educated, empowered and intelligent enough to make them for me?

ENOUGH.

It’s time to push back.  Hard. 

Obama: “FIFA Acted Stupidly”

AP photo via Daylife.

Is Obama feeling okay?

The AP reports:

President Barack Obama says FIFA made the “wrong decision” in awarding the 2022 World Cup to Qatar over the United States.

The U.S. Soccer Federation spent millions of dollars on its bid. Former President Bill Clinton was highly involved in the process and participated in the closing presentation.

He doesn’t say he’s disappointed by the outcome…that would be understandable given the embarrassment he must feel after sending Holder and Clinton to Zürich to make another ostentatious bid to bring a big sporting event to our shores, and failing, (again).  But he says the International Federation of Association Football made “the wrong decision”, (like there was only one *right* decision)?

Stunning.

See also:

Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin: ‘And the Host Country for the 2022 World Cup Will Be…’

Reverse Midas Touch confirmed yet again. Obama should be happy though because of the “Muslim outreach” angle of FIFA’s history-making decision.

US taxpayers took it in the shorts to the tune of well over a million dollars when the President and First Lady went to Copenhagen to lobby to have the 2016 Olympic Games in Chicago. No telling yet what the cost of this failed World Cup bid will end up being.

Hat tip: Weasel Zippers

Share

Yeah, They Think You’re That Stupid

Copyright © 2009 Universal Press Syndicate

Jerry Shenk at The American Thinker spotted this gem in a  sympathetic piece on the president by New York Times reporter, Matt Bai:

The body of Mr. Obama’s writing and experiences before he became a presidential candidate would suggest that he is instinctively pragmatic… Privately, Mr. Obama has described himself…as essentially a Blue Dog Democrat…

Uh-huh.

A blue dog. Whoda thunk it.

Here’s how Wikipedia defines Blue dog Democrats, just to be perfectly clear:

The Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, commonly known as the Blue Dog Democrats, is a group of United States Congressional Representatives from the Democratic Party who identify themselves as moderate or conservative and favor “compromise and bipartisanship over ideology and party discipline.”[1]

Yes, if there’s anything Obama is known for, it’s his conservative leanings, and willingness to compromise.

Clearly, there are still many in the MSM who, after investing so much of their credibility helping  Obama get elected, are not willing to let go of the dream.

***

Speaking of the media, here they are, carrying Obama’s water, with  these latest talking points on “tax cuts”, (AKA “current tax rates”.)

MORE:

Good Morning America’s Claire Shipman on Thursday tried to disguise a Democratic activist as just a jobless American who would be hurt by Republican failure to extend unemployment benefits. Shipman sympathetically recounted that Edrie Irvine, who she didn’t explain spoke at a Nancy Pelosi press conference on Wednesday, “never thought her very livelihood would depend on a political debate in Congress.”

A graphic reading “unemployed” appeared onscreen as Irvine complained, “They are talking about tax cuts for the rich and are holding people like me hostage.” Who is Ms. Irvine? According to her bio on the leftist Democracy For America web page, she’s a “tree-hugging, bleeding-heart, ACLU-card-carrying progressive liberal and damn proud of it!


Share

Chris Christie Asked To Pardon NJ Man Sentenced To 7 Years For Gun Law Violations

This is an update to the story that BlackisWhite Imperial Consigliere posted on Monday, about the NJ man who was prosecuted for transporting firearms without the proper permit. The guns were in his trunk (both locked and unloaded as New Jersey law requires), and he was in the process of moving back to NJ from Colorado.
In New Jersey, residents who want to transport firearms legally must request a permit from a local law enforcement office and produce a letter stating why it is necessary for them to carry a gun.  In other words, New Jerseyans have to prove need before exercising what many Americans consider a constitutional right.
***

Now, protesters across the state are organizing a push for an appeal for the court’s ruling. A “Free Brian Aitken” Facebook page has almost 7,000 fans, the website briandaitken.com was built and a rally will be held Dec. 12, in Towns River, N.J. Aitken’s family is asking Chris Christie to grant clemency — gun control just might be the next test conservatives throw at the New Jersey governor.

A pardon from Christie is far from assured, even if he does have fairly established, conservative credentials.

During his 2009 campaign, he told Fox News host Sean Hannity, “Listen, at the end of the day, what I support are common sense laws that will allow people to protect themselves. But I also am very concerned about the safety of our police officers on the streets. Very concerned. And I want to make sure that we don’t have an abundance of guns out there.”

A lot of people are watching this case, and are hoping that the Governor does the right thing.

Tim Lynch, president of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice, agreed. “This is a guy who seemed at every step, was trying to do the right thing,” he told TheDC. “This was an overreaction from arrest to prosecution … seems to be an exercise of extremely poor judgment.”

“When you look at it from the totality … no serious person could think that he’s [Aitken] a criminal, that he was doing anything other than trying to take his lawful possessions and move with them to New Jersey,” Neily said. “What else was he supposed to do with them?”

Both Lynch and Neily said without hesitation that Christie should pardon Aitken. Neily even went so far as to say this single issue could change his entire opinion of Christie – someone he has so far supported.

The Caller reports that Christie is aware of the case, and a formal application for pardon has been received. A spokesman for the governor declined to comment any further.

Stay tuned.
-
See Also:

Share

It’s Full Steam Ahead For Obamacrats Who Haven’t Learned Their Lesson


They’re coming to take me away, ha-haaa!!
They’re coming to take me away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa
To the funny farm. Where life is beautiful all the time and I’ll be
happy to see those nice young men in their clean white coats and they’re
coming to take me away, ha-haaa!!!!!

That old gem from the Dr. Demento Show should be the theme song for the President and the 111th Congress – an insane clown posse that has dangerously increased our national debt by “not letting any crises go to waste”, throwing ungodly amounts of money at real and imagined problems, and increasing the role of government in our lives, against our will. In between spending sprees, the President even found time to appoint a fiscal commission to find ways to lower the debt. But the commission’s center-right proposals, he’ll likely ignore in favor of more spending.

Seton Motely at Human Events reviewed the trainwreck:

From the nearly $1 trillion “stimulus” bill, which stimulated nothing except the bank accounts of key Democrat constituencies like state and local government unions to the nine-month anti-will of the people slog to drag the private health sector-destroying Obamacare across the finish line.

To the productivity-demolishing financial “reform” that hamstrings private businesses but does nothing to address the actual cause of our crisis: the government-sponsored home loan entities Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

To the proposed Cap & Tax (Trade) battering of our energy sector.

And as November grew closer, and the Democrats saw the electoral damage they were going to endure grow greater with each passing day, they quickly devised the horribly mis-named DISCLOSE Act—probably the worst frontal assault on the 1st Amendment ever devised—in the name of campaign finance “reform.”

Time and again, proposal after proposal, bill after bill, we made our desires known; time and again, the Democrat-dominated 111th Congress ignored us, continuing to ramp up the spending and the size of the federal government.

The good news is, on November 2nd, the American people called the men in white coats  to take a good many of these miscreants away, and starting in January, Congress will be a saner and more sober place…

But, as The American Spectator’s Peter Ferrara notes:

The bad news is how much trouble our country is still in. For after all of President Obama’s double talking sweet talk right after the vote, the harsh reality, inconsistent with our very democracy, is that the Democrats and the Washington Establishment are rejecting the message the people sent. Their response is the political equivalent of “Shut Up.”

How else can we interpret the decision of House Democrats to defy the American people, and reelect ultra-left San Francisco Democrat Nancy Pelosi as Minority Leader? House Democrat candidates will now campaign in 2012 on the theme, “Vote for Us, and Bring Back Pelosi!” I think they have now answered the question, “How stupid do they think we are?”

And how else can we interpret President Obama, who said at his press conference the day after the electoral rout, “Over the last two years we have made progress. But clearly the American people have not felt that yet. And they told us that yesterday.” Just what exactly is he saying here? The words say the American people told us on Election Day that the Democrats are not moving to implement their left-wing agenda fast enough. President Obama is now acting as if this is the message he got on Election Day, as we will see below.

And how else can we interpret Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), who said in a Senate hearing just before Thanksgiving, “I hunger for quality news. There’s a little bug inside of me which wants to get the FCC to say to Fox and to MSNBC: ‘Out! Off! End! Goodbye!” Funny he should say that. Because there’s a little bug inside of me that wants to get the FEC to say to Rockefeller: “Out! Off! End! Goodbye!”

This is your modern Democrat party, run by New Left hippies from the ’60s in suits, who don’t even believe in the First Amendment, because they are really just Hugo Chavez in waiting.

***

Andrew Glidden at The Politicizer is astounded by the tone-deafness of the President:

Apparently, November was really about falling in with the Democrat’s party line, particularly letting Obamacare stand as it is. Perhaps, given Mr. Obama’s mastery of evasion, he should forego basketball on the White House’s new courts and take up fencing instead.  Whereas Clinton largely resigned himself to a Republican Congress, Obama is protesting that voters really still wanted his agenda, and – now that the wind has shifted – that elections really don’t have consequences, giving him the freedom to pursue his agenda unconstrained by his recent public censure. So what does he see as his role?  “[The President's] core responsibility is making sure that we’ve got an economy that’s growing, a middle class that feels secure, that jobs are being created.”  Not faithfully executing the laws Congress has passed, not protecting citizens’ natural rights, but directing the economy.  The sheer arrogance required to even conceive of this as right, let alone Constitutional, let alone possible, is astounding.  Voters’ resistance really wasn’t about the wrongheadedness of this grand vision of executive power, merely an expression that “it felt as if government was getting much more intrusive into people’s lives than they were accustomed to”.  It’s not that voters disagree on any kind of intellectual level – voters just “felt” like it was more “than they were accustomed to” (and presumably, if we stay the course, we’ll just get used to it and all will be well).

Despite all this, there is a glimmer of hope: Obama conceded that American prosperity came from free markets, and, startlingly, promoted “individual rights and individual freedoms”.  Sure, his idea of free markets is ones in which the government can micromanage consumers and producers alike, and his idea of “freedom” is emancipation from reality, but at least he’s using the right words.

A clearly awestruck AJ Strata says Emperor Obama Has Emerged, So Sayeth The Lord:

Well, we knew Obama’s egomaniac personality would be a horrible fit as leader of America. But now we are seeing how he is going to respond to the drubbing he took in November. He is going to go full steam ahead into liberal madness, beginning with stopping the flow of cheap energy to the US.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced Wednesday afternoon that the Obama administration will not allow offshore oil drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico or off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as part of the next five-year drilling plan, reversing two key policy changes President Obama announced in late March.

As Ferrara says, Obama plans to rule by decree.

I cringe when I see commentators try to advise Obama on political strategy. They are not getting it. He is not interested in political strategy. He is interested in left-wing ideology, and the New Revolution.

This is the leader of “the Free World,” and the most powerful man on the planet. That is why America, and, indeed, the whole world, is still in so much trouble.

I hope and pray that the Republicans in the 112th Congress are up for the epic battles that are to come.

MORE:

Quin Hillyer, The American Spectator on how Repubs should proceed:

Obama is, to use the vernacular, an entirely different breed of cat. He does not think in conventional American political terms, or conventional societal terms. This is problematic: While some escapes from convention are devoutly to be desired, his model of action does not even nod to convention at all, and thus not to established and valuable societal norms. We want to celebrate American civilization; Obama wants to redefine it.

Ronald Reagan famously advised Americans to “trust but verify”; when it comes to Obama, conservatives should verify without trusting. We can even give him credit for what by his own lights are noble intentions, while knowing that there really is neither nobility nor admirability in them.

To deal with Obama, then, conservatives will need to keep our cool and keep our wits. But in keeping our cool, we must not be cold-blooded. We act not in hatred for what Obama stands for, but through love for country, Constitution, and civil society. The better angels of our nature, guided by a tough-minded realism, must prevail.

RELATED:

Part 3 of PJTV’s interview with Stanley Kurtz.

PJTV: Barack Obama, Radical in Chief: Obama’s Non-Profit Shock Troops.

Eternity Road: Ahead Of The Curve

The American Thinker: Liberal Excuses for Conservative Victory

NewZeal: Communist Party Leader on Using the Democrats

In a recent article in the Communist Party theoretical journal Political Affairs, Sims takes to task, another comrade, C.J. Atkins , who had effectively advocated dumping the “communist” label, in order to be able to work more effectively inside the Democratic Party.

Sims acknowledges that working with and inside the the Democrats “will be an area of engagement for those wanting to make a difference.”

He even acknowledges the possibility that the communists may be able to “capture’ the Democratic Party entirely.


Share

Hump-Day Link-Around

As Obama’s Debt Commission releases plans to reduce the debt,  the Dem wild spending spree continues apace.

The Daily Caller: Final debt commission vote anti-climactic, as three plans released already lay out way forward

President Obama’s deficit commission must appear on the national stage Wednesday and announce something: it may be a proposal approved by a majority of its 18 members, but most money is on an irresolvable split that makes a final product impossible.

So while there will be some drama this week around the outcome of the panel’s deliberations – the commission won’t vote on the report until Friday – it will be in many ways anticlimactic. The real groundwork for what is to come in the months ahead – the hard work of actually making choices when spending cuts and deficit reduction become a necessity – has already been laid by the commission in the past few weeks.

RCP: Rep. Ryan: Have To Deal With Health Care To “Preempt Debt Crisis”:

Congress is poised to give President Barack Obama — along with his wife, Michelle — a congressional victory as the House takes up legislation to push greasy foods off the school lunch line and sugary drinks out of vending machines.

***

Vending machines could be stocked with less candy and fewer high-calorie drinks.

“Less” and “fewer”? How about getting rid of them altogether?

How about getting rid of the “extras” like potato chips and ice cream I have to ban my kids from getting? Because those are the things that cause childhood obesity. Those are the things that shouldn’t be in schools. The school lunches, themselves are fine. I don’t understand why it costs 4.5 billion make food healthier, and get rid of crap. This is an expansion of  the free lunch program, period.

***

Tuesday, Congress passed Pigford II, which pays American Indians and black farmers $4.6 billion: Video:Steve King Says NO To Reparations.

***

Michelle Malkin reports on more nanny state action: Senate passes new food police bill: Roll call vote 73-25; Senator Bennet: “It’s all rigged”

UPDATE:

Weasel Zippers: FAIL: House May Block Food Safety Bill Because Senate Dems Included Tax Provisions Which According to Constitutional Provisions Must Originate in House…

***

and The Littlest Victims of Obamacare:

It’s time for America’s youth to buckle up and take a rough ride on Reality Highway. For the past two years, President Obama has promised our children the moon, stars, rainbows, unicorns and universal health care for all. But the White House Santa’s cradle-to-grave entitlement mandates are a spectacularly predictable bust.

Don’t take it from me. Take it from Obamacare’s own biggest cheerleaders.

Late last month, the Service Employees International Union informed dues-paying members of its behemoth 1199 affiliate in New York that it was dropping its health care coverage for children. That’s right. A radical leftist union, not an evil Republican corporation, is abandoning the young ‘uns to cut costs.

More than 30,000 low-wage families will be affected, according to The Wall Street Journal. Who’s to blame? SEIU 1199 benefits manager Mitra Behroozi singled out oppressive new state and federal regulations, including the much-ballyhooed Obamacare rule forcing insurers to cover dependents well into their 20s:

“…(N)ew federal health-care reform legislation requires plans with dependent coverage to expand that coverage up to age 26,” Behroozi explained in an Oct. 22 letter to members. “Our limited resources are already stretched as far as possible, and meeting this new requirement would be financially impossible.”

Don’t tell me that  the very union that pumped millions of dollars into Obama’s campaign for President, and millions more into the campaign for Obamacare,  busted heads at town halls, and accused ObamaCare opponents of “scaremongering” when they predicted this kind of stuff would happen; like Malkin said, “ObamaCare’s biggest cheerleaders”……are making kids bear the brunt of their handiwork. Oh my. Don’t tell me that. There can be no schadenfreude when children are involved.

***

And now for something completely different from Babalu: Freedom by the Pound, the story of a Cuban political prisoner who was  an athlete and a heavyweight boxer weighing 220 pounds when he went to jail in 2003. When he was released last July, he was a paraplegic, and weighed a mere 116 pounds.The daily “unspeakable acts of humiliation and torture” had taken a toll both physically and mentally.

Before and after pix via iOWNTHEWORLD

Read the story, and watch the short video at Babalu, via iOWNTHEWORLD: Hey, Michael Moore. This is the REAL Cuba

***

Caleb Howe at RedState on how climate science consensus works: The Climate Conference Echo Chamber:

…the journalist Phelim McAleer was denied press credentials for the UN Climate Change Conference taking place in sunny Cancun, Mexico this week. (Certainly a better PR choice than frigid Copenhagen.)

Last year, McAleer and Ann McElhinney, with whom McAleer created the documentary Not Evil, Just Wrong, attended the Copenhagen conference. Their on-site reports resulted in over 2 million YouTube views, and a fair amount of press; which is likely the reason that McAleer was denied accreditation this year. Here’s an excerpt from the press release posted to the Not Evil, Just Wrong website:

McAleer says the refusal to allow him access to the Cancun Climate Change Conference is censorship.

“I sent them exactly the same documentation that was acceptable for Copenhagen last year, but it seems they did not like my coverage of Copenhagen and are now trying to silence me and the people who have questions about this process,” said McAleer.

“The message is clear—ask UN scientists and politicians difficult questions and you will be banned from any UN sponsored events. No difficult questions allowed,” he added.

I wonder if James Cameron will be there, ready to debate all comers…..(if they were allowed to come).

Hot Air gives us an idea of the type of cool stuff they’ll be discussing in Cancun: Fun new climate change solution: Let’s impose rationing on the developed world:

In one paper Professor Kevin Anderson, Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, said the only way to reduce global emissions enough, while allowing the poor nations to continue to grow, is to halt economic growth in the rich world over the next twenty years.

Meanwhile….from Climate Change Dispatch: Book Launch Exposes UN Climate Science in Another Scandal:

Newly released science book revelation is set to heap further misery on UN global warming researchers. Will latest setback derail Cancun Climate conference?

Authors of a new book  Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ claim they have debunked the widely established greenhouse gas theory climate change. In the first of what they say will be a series of sensational statements to promote the launch of their book, they attack a cornerstone belief of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – what is known as the “carbon isotope argument.”

Mišo Alkalaj, is one of 24 expert authors of this two-volume publication, among them are qualified climatologists, prominent skeptic scientists and a world leading math professor. It is Alkalaj’s chapter in the second of the two books that exposes the fraud concerning the isotopes 13C/12C found in carbon dioxide (CO2).

If true, the disclosure may possibly derail last-ditch attempts at a binding international treaty to ‘halt man-made global warming.’ At minimum the story will be sure to trigger a fresh scandal for the beleaguered United Nations body.

***

Byron York: What the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell report really says:

…the Pentagon team asked service members “who have been deployed at some point and been in combat environment since September 11, 2001″:

If Don’t Ask, Don’t tell is repealed and you are working with a service member in your immediate unit who has said he or she is gay or lesbian, how, if at all, would it affect your immediate unit’s effectiveness at completing its mission in a field environment or out to sea?

The differences are striking.  Just 11 percent say repeal would have a positive effect, while 44 percent say it would have a negative effect.  Twenty six percent of those surveyed say it would have equally positive and negative effects, and 19 percent say it would have no effect.

Break down the numbers by service branch, and the results are even more striking.  Fifty-nine percent of Marines who have been in combat say repeal would have a negative effect, and just 11 percent say it would have no effect.  Forty-five percent of Army respondents say it would have a negative effect.  The opposition is less intense in the Navy and Air Force, where 35 percent and 41 percent say repeal would have a negative effect, but those are still significant minorities.

And these are large groups.  According to the study, 70 percent of respondents are now or have been deployed, and 83 percent of them have been in a combat zone or an area where they received hostile fire pay.  There is simply no way to argue that they overwhelmingly support repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

***

Babalu: “TANGO DOWN”: th3j35t3r Hacks WikiLeaks

Nice…

Doug Ross: HHS Head Sebelius: We’ll Protect Americans’ Sensitive Health Information With The Same Level Of Security The State department Uses

Yay….

Slate: WikiLeaks, Hillary Clinton, and the Smoking Gun:

The leaked cables make it impossible for Hillary Clinton to continue as secretary of state.

Dick Morris at The Hill: Hillary: Up to her old tricks

National Journal: Gibbs: We’ve Got Clinton’s Back

***

Hot Air: “Gamechanger” weapon now deployed in Afghanistan:

…a weapon that can actually find a target behind cover and detonate without air or artillery support, and what that would mean for US forces engaged in urban or guerilla warfare.

***

***
***

I told you this morning that the Dems were cooking up a new version of the DREAM Act to lure squishy Republicans and fence-sitting Democrats.

Here it is in full. Note: There are now four versions of the bill on the legislative calendar. None have been reviewed in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Once again, the Dems are rushing to cram ill-conceived entitlements down Americans’ throats and subverting the deliberative process.

Be very afraid….

***

Erick Erickson: The TSA Lies In Response to RedState

Short version: Blogger Bob is full of it.

Hyscience: Has the Obama Administration Been Lying About New START’s Effect on Our Missile Defense?

The short answer to the question is that at the very least … the Obama administration has been purposefully misleading Senate opponents to the bill all along, and if one wishes to be perfectly accurate – the Obama administration has indeed been lying about the New START treaty’s potential negative effect on U.S. missile defenses.

Share

It’s Come To This: Dueling Christmas Billboards

Like I’ve been saying…it’s that time of year, again…the Christmas season is upon us, which means  militant atheists are out in full force to prove to everyone just how goshdarn cute and clever they can be with their anti-Christmas sentiments. I didn’t bother to do a post about this bit of obnoxiousness when it appeared outside the heavily-traveled Lincoln Tunnel between New York and New Jersey, because, really,  what can you say to people who are that determined to be killjoys? Do you just ignore them…what?

Keep telling yourselves that if it makes you feel better….

But good old, Bill Donahue of The Catholic League, is having none of it, and put up a response billboard:

“We decided to counterpunch after a donor came forward seeking to challenge the anti-Christmas statement by American Atheists,” Catholic League President Bill Donahue said in a statement on the group’s website. “Our approach is positive, and services the common good. Theirs is negative, and is designed to sow division. It’s what they do.”

Which billboard do you suppose is more appreciated?

RELATED:

A Sunday rumination from Frances R. Porretto, November 16, 2008:

First, number 3: “There’s probably no God.” One aspect of the debate over the existence of a supernatural realm that enrages anti-theists is that there’s no indisputable evidence either for or against the proposition. Their militancy is as unverifiable and unfalsifiable as any religious faith. Therefore, according to Porretto’s Partition, it constitutes a faith of its own. (Beware: he who says that to an anti-theist had better have the number of the local ambulance service on speed-dial.)

Read the whole thing.

John Hawkins, RWN: Liberalism: Mohammad Cartoons Vs. Jesus Being Eaten By Ants

Share

Video:Steve King Says NO To Reparations

Tuesday, Congress passed Pigford II, which pays American Indians and black farmers $4.6 billion to settle a pair of historic class-action lawsuits.

The measure passed the House in a 256-152 vote and now goes to President Barack Obama, who promised during his campaign to work toward resolving the long-standing disputes and others involving the government’s past discrimination against minorities.

They’re raiding funds set aside for WIC to pay for it:

The costs of the bill would be offset by diverting dollars from a surplus in nutrition programs for women and children, extending customs user fees and new efforts for the Treasury to recoup excess unemployment insurance payments.

Congressman Steve King says this fraudulent settlement amounts to reparations:

video via Breitbart TV

King wrote at Big Government that the unaccountable lame duck Dems who temporarily control the Rules Committee would not allow his amendment protecting taxpayers from this excessive and fraudulent spending to be presented on the House floor for a vote.

By cutting off consideration of my amendment, and by refusing to investigate serious allegations of Pigford fraud prior to voting on legislation allocating an additional $1.15 billion to the program, the lame duck Congress is, in effect, enabling Pigford fraud and this calls for an investigation by the 112th Congress.

Michelle Bachmann has promised that the new Republican House will hold hearings and investigate every single claim before it goes out.

A blast from the past:

You may recall that Obama once lamented that he didn’t think they could impose major redistributive change through the courts, but “reparative work” could be achieved legislatively:

PREVIOUSLY:

Senate Approves $1.15 Billion Pigford II Settlement – House Repubs Vow To Push Back

Sherrod To Sue Breitbart

How Can There Be 86,000 Racial Discrimination Claims In The Pigford vs Glickman Case When There Are Only 39,697 total Black farmers?

Hat tip: Gateway Pundit

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers