More McCotter For Prez Talk


I’ve already mentioned Michigan Republican, Thaddeus McCotter as a possible dark horse candidate for 2012. The Washington Times’ Kerry Picket,  now says sources around DC are chatting up the idea:

Conservative Republican donors and grassroots activists, who have raised concerns that there is not yet a true Reagan conservative in the GOP presidential primary are privately encouraging Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, Michigan Republican, to look at a potential entry.

McCotter showed off his foreign policy chops in this Fox News appearance, Sunday, where he discussed aid to Pakistan, which some Congressmen say should be cut off:

See also:

The Lonely Conservative:  Thaddeus McCotter for President?

Previously:

Why Not? McCotter For President

Linked by Hyscience, thanks!

Posted in Repubs. 1 Comment »

Some Call Him Gutsy

It’s hard not to notice the crass message coordination coming from Obama sycophants in the wake the Navy Seals operation that took out Osama Bin Laden, last week. The UK Telegraph’s Toby Harnden, compiled a list of Dems who have stayed impressively on message with the “gutsy call” theme. Natl. Sec. Adviser John Brennan, Senator John Kerry, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Leon Panetta , Denis McDonagh, and Middle East Institute President Wendy Chamberlain should all be congratulated for their fidelity to the cause (aka Obama 2012).

As Bruce McQuain notes:

One thing about the Dems when they want to try to sell something they are very good at syncing the talking points.

In an attempt to make the Jr. Chipmunk sitting in the small chair in the so-called “iconic” photo seem more than he is, we have our word of the day as spread by the usual suspects.

This latest obvious message coordination brings to mind that conference call from not too long ago in which a certain Dem Senator was overheard telling other Senators what to tell reporters re budget negotiations with the GOP.

He told the group to make sure they label the GOP spending cuts as “extreme.”

“I always use extreme, Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use.”

Substitute “extreme” for “gutsy”, as in “I always use gutsy”.

Dems are making sure they label a President known for his indecisiveness as “gutsy”.

We now know that the OBL’s complex had been discovered in August of last year, and the CIA had been watching it ever since. There had been a high degree of confidence that he was in the house for months.

Even though Panetta believed we had “the best evidence since [the 2001 battle of] Tora Bora [where bin Laden was last seen]” that we had OBL’s location , he  was only able to convince Obama to go ahead with the mission on Friday, 4/29. That’s when the president finally authorized the helicopter mission and made his order official in a signed letter.

What else was he gonna do?

See also:

Redstate: Obama Made A “Gutsy Call” And He’ll Tell You So

We can all be glad bin Laden is dead but the administration turning this into some kind of proof of Obama’s toughness is little more than juvenile. The fact is that killing bin Laden, or attempting to kill him, was the only choice that Obama had. The fact that he has dithered over this decision for two months and at the eleventh hour took a 16 hour nap to think on the subject should give every American call for alarm not thanksgiving. Regardless of the political fallout from the raid, the vague “significant consequences” Obama mentioned on 60 Minutes, we all would have forgiven him for doing something to kill bin Laden.

Roger L. Simon: The Reluctant Assassination of Osama:

Did Barack Obama want to assassinate Osama bin Laden? He may have at some point, because he gave the ultimate order, or allowed it to happen. But I suspect the president was deeply ambivalent.

It’s not just his postmodern worldview that suggests this reluctance. It is the discombobulated aftermath of the killing, the weirdly botched reportage featuring such events as cabinet members in the situation room supposedly watching a (we learned) non-existent streaming video of the action and the statement that bin Laden — who had been under surveillance for months from a CIA safe house — was living in a million dollar mansion.

That was dialed down within a day or two to $250,000 and then revealed, in videos, to be close to a slum. In fact, OBL’s squalid living conditions made the hated Guantanamo seem like the Four Seasons. If the SEALs had taken him alive, it would have been an upgrade.

Ron Futrell of Big Journalism: Obama and 60 Minutes, Spiking The Football

Virtually every question was phrased as a lay-up for Obama to bring more attention to himself and to allow him to “spike the football” over and over again. Spiking the football is what Dear Leader accused us little serfs in the Outer Realm of doing had we seen the dead bin Laden photos. We wouldn’t know how to control ourselves. Instead, the White House has now become like DeSean Jackson running across the goal line and throwing the ball in the stands.

“After you make the decision to go ahead, you have, like this incredible week, you surveyed the tornado damage in Alabama, you took your family to the Shuttle launch and this was all going on, you knew what was going to happen?” I was waiting for Kroft to say that Obama also stopped Global Warming, caused the seas to abate and found the Lindbergh Baby during that week.

Oh, it gets better—“Did you have to suppress the urge to tell someone, did you wanna tell somebody, did you want to tell Michelle, did you tell Michelle? Ya, Steve—he told The Rock, didn’t you see Dwayne Johnson’s tweets breaking the news?

Obama never answered the question about Michelle, and I don’t think anybody really cares. I was waiting for Kroft to ask Obama how many cigarettes he smoked during that week and what he scored for the nine holes he played on Super Sunday.

As for the room that day where they watched, “What was the mood?” Answer: “Tense.”

“Were you nervous?” Answer: “Yes.”

Brilliant stuff there.

Pretty mockworthy stuff, which White House Dossier’s Keith Koffler has some fun with: White House Dossier Gets Fawning Interview with Obama!

WHD: Now, How did you handle the incredible tension in the Situation Room the day you took out Bin Laden?

Obama: It’s all part of being a leader, of being, you know, basically a badass.

WHD: Yes, absolutely

Obama: And I was there for the others. I noticed Hillary about to collapse, and I comforted here with a hug and a shot of tequilla. But me, you know, I have to admit, it was tense. But I can handle it. I just can.

WHD: Is the story true that your national security aides were divided on this, but you just knew what had to be done?

Obama: Yes, some of my advisers were sissies. They were wringing their hands, and pissing on themselves.

Me, I knew we only had a 50-50 shot. It could have gone either way. But I just said, “Sometimes, folks, you just have to go for it. You have to trust your gut. You have to say, ‘Danger? Risk? Bring it on! Tension? Uncertainty? I eat if for breakfast!’ America needed to bag this dude. And so I sad, ‘Go for it, punk. Make my day. A man has to do what a man has to do.’ And so forth.”

WHD: Wowwww.

Obama: Would you like a glass of water?

WHD: No, I’m OK. And what did you say after you knew you’d killed Bin Laden?

Obama: I was as taciturn and cool as John Wayne putting his gun back in his holster. I just said, “We got him.”

WHD: Hot damn!

iOWNTHEWORLD has the movie poster for the action film scheduled for early Nov. 2012!: Legal Insurrection Films Presents -

Weasel Zippers: Fun Fact of the Day: Bush Got a Bigger Approval Rating Bounce for Catching Saddam Than Obama Got for Killing Bin Laden…

Your Sunday Hymn: Finlandia Hymn

For no other reason than I love love love this melody:

Choir Misure Composte (Bari)
Conductor Bepi Speranza

January 1, 2006 – Teatro Piccinni, Bari (Italy)

Lyrics

Read the rest of this entry »

Saturday Movie Matinee

By “movie matinee”, I mean a bunch of videos I plucked off of Youtube, what else?

First up, via iOWNTHEWORLD, Sarah Palin discusses how Obama is diminishing our energy supply which is causing our fuel prices to go up.

Steven Crowder gives us a peek of OBL in hell:

Ann  McElhinney of Not Evil Just Wrong brings us her latest video from her series on eco-hypocrites:

Here’s Rush Limbaugh, in case you missed him, yesterday, talking about Thursday night’s Republican debate:

Via The Blaze, new footage of Bin Laden Compound:

One more:

This one, via Jim Hoft, gives me a tingle up my leg:

Niiiice, those South Carolina Republicans ain’t drinking the koolaid, at all.

Last one, I promise, via iOWNTHEWORLD: His Gutsiness visits Ground Zero For The First Time.


SEE ALSO:

Vote: New Tone Poll For Week Of May 1-6

Linked by Michelle Malkin in Buzzworthy,  Doug Ross, and CMBlake, thanks!

Share

SEIU Marches In Lock Step With Commies In May Day Parade

Zombie has the full report/photo-essay with video: SEIU drops mask, goes full commie:

In case you think the SEIU is some peripheral out-of-the-mainstream organization:

The SEIU devoted $28 million to Obama’s campaign, making the SEIU “the organization that spent the most to help Barack Obama get elected president.” Furthermore, who is Obama’s favorite White House guest and one of his closest confidants?

The individual who has visited the Obama White House the most: SEIU President Andy Stern, who has visited 53 times.

Obama is closely linked with the SEIU.
The SEIU is closely linked with communists.
You do the math.

***

In case you were wondering what the SEIU was saying during all of this, here’s a video of the SEIU chanting “Legalization or REVOLUTION!” Clear enough?

Tell me the honest truth: If the Tea Party had marched in a rally behind a banner held up by fascists or neo-Nazis, don’t you think it would have been national news? But the nation’s biggest Obama-supporting political organization marched behind banners like these, and not a peep about it in the media. Hmmmm….

Remember, 11% of Americans (aka Obama’s base) now think that Communism is morally superior to capitalism.

Linked by Michelle Malkin, thanks!

Share

New Tone Poll For Week Of May 1-6

Sanctimonious liberals love to blast conservatives for their “vitriolic discourse”, yet often fail spectacularly to maintain basic civility in their own discourse. The New Tone Award is reserved for left-wing notables who wallow in this hypocrisy. The list, this week, is smaller than usual because most libs have been too busy gushing about Obama’s “gutsy call” to go after conservatives with their usual vigor. Chris Matthews, most notably, has been able to balance his leg-tingling enthusiasm for the president with vicious Republican-bashing rhetoric.

New Tone Nominees For Week Of May 1-6

Democrat Rep. Gary Ackerman doesn’t waste a second taking a swipe at President Bush:

Dem Congressman: This Is “Mission Accomplished Moment” Bush “Fantasized” About…

Condescending Harry Reid: Marco Rubio ‘Has to Understand Who He Is and Who He Represents’

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) speaking to a Latino internet news service launches into a condescending reproach to his fellow senator from Florida. The ethnic implication of Reid’s remarks bring to mind his statement from the 2010 election when he declared “I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican.”

Hard-Left Radio Host Mike Malloy: When Will Navy SEALs Take Out Death-Dealing George W. Bush?

But Iraq — all the death in Iraq was not caused by bin Laden. The death in Iraq was caused by George W. Bush. Five thousand Americans, tens of thousands permanently damaged and shot to pieces, a million Iraqis dead — that wasn’t bin Laden. That was George Bush. So when does Seal Unit 6, or whatever it’s called, drop in on George Bush? Bush was responsible for a lot more death, innocent death, than bin Laden. Wasn’t he, or am I wrong here?

HHS Secretary Sebelius: Under Ryan Budget Plan Seniors Will “Die Sooner”…

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that the Ryan Medicare proposal will lead to early deaths among seniors.

During testimony before the House Education and the Workforce Committee, she said seniors “will run out of money very quickly.”

She continued, “If you run out of the government voucher and then you run out of your own money, you’re left to scrape together charity care, go without care, die sooner. There really aren’t a lot of options.”

Chris Matthews Dreams Up Silly GOP Debate Questions: Do You ‘Fundamentalist’ Christians Hate Science?

On Thursday’s Hardball, hours before the first GOP face-off, the cable anchor dreamed up hypothetical queries he would like to see: “Question to Mr. Candidate, do you believe in evolution? Are you a fundamentalist who believes in the Bible as written? Has man been around millions of years or, say, just about 6000?

Chris Matthews Bizarrely Mocks Rush Limbaugh as a ‘Walrus Underwater’ for bin Laden Response

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on Wednesday mocked Rush Limbaugh’s response to the killing of Osama bin Laden, deriding the conservative as a “walrus underwater.” Matthews also made an odd grunting noise to back up this description.

While Hyping Barack Obama’s Killing of bin Laden, Chris Matthews Lashes Out at ‘Sadist’ Dick Cheney

Former Newsweek editor Howard Fineman contrasted the Bush/Cheney administration’s dropping of bombs in Iraq with Obama’s actions. Matthews responded by mocking, “There’s a difference between being cold blooded- I think presidents have to be cold blooded- and being a sadist.”

As if his point wasn’t clear, the liberal anchor interrupted Fineman to add, ” I was referring to Cheney, of course.”

As always, you can make up to 3 selections, but you may only vote once, at Left-Wing Institute For Civil Discourse.

Video: Condoleezza Rice Smacks Down Lawrence O’Donnell In Epic Interview

Condi holds her own in this hostile MSNBC interview with Scary Larry O’Donnell, who she chastises at one point for having his facts wrong when he simpers the oft repeated left-wing lie that Bush “couldn’t assemble a coalition”  for the Iraq war.  (What made him think he could get away with that load of b.s. with the former Sec. of State?)

You’re going to want a cigarette when this is done.

Hat tip: Breitbart TV.

By “ill informed”, I think what she really means is, “complete jackass”.

Video: When Debra Burlingame Asked Obama About Holder’s Investigation Of CIA Interrogators, “He Turned Around And Walked Away”

Obama was expected to make a speech at Ground zero, on Thursday, but opted not to, presumably because it would have looked to much like “spiking the football”. Which is what it would have been. He did lay a wreath at the site, and met with some “carefully selected” 9/11 families.

Debra Burlingame was among those who got to meet with the president, and she used occasion to  ask him a  question about Holder’s possible criminal charges against the CIA interrogators who got the information that helped to bring Osama Bin Laden to justice. She asked him, even though he can’t  tell the Atty Gen. what to do; ” Can’t you at least give him your opinion?”

Burlingame expanded on the meeting with Hannity on his his radio show, this afternoon. The Blaze has the audio.

What kind of man accepts the accolades of an appreciative nation for taking down an arch enemy, while allowing for the prosecution of the very people who helped make it happen?

What kind of person does that?!

Share

Holder On The Hot-Seat For Project Gunrunner

I’ve been red-flagging this most explosive homeland security scandal for you for more than a month.

Independent citizen journalists, inside whistleblowers, and relentless GOP watchdogs on Capitol Hill led by GOP Rep. Darrell Issa and GOP Sen. Charles Grassley have kept up the pressure on the Obama administration to come clean on this deadly, stimulus-funded border nightmare.

And now, the fit is really starting to hit the shan on the Project Gunrunner story.

***

Friction” between watchdogs and Team Obama is growing, natch.

And Holder is finally, finally squirming on the hotseat.

As I’ve noted before, this goes far beyond the usual waste, fraud and abuse underwritten by progressive profligacy. It’s bloodstained government malfeasance overseen by anti-gun ideologues.

Read it all.

Here’s Holder stonewalling to questions from Sen. Charles Grassley at the Senate hearing, yesterday:

Grassley talked about his frustrating exchange with Holder with NRATV.

He notes that he told Holder in a footnote to a letter that he didn’t think he was being well served by his staff.

UPDATE:

Fox Nation: Holder Hammered on Hill Over ‘Gunwalker’ Scandal:

Appearing today before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Eric Holder got grilled about the “gunwalker” controversy in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is accused of allowing guns to get into the hands of criminals in Mexico.

Watch the video at link. Holder, who continues to stonewall, was indeed hammered by Issa.

Issa also appeared on NRA News to answer questions about the exchange:

Issa says ATF whistleblowers, (risking their own jobs) are coming forward to offer information about the program, which he says was opposed by law enforcement at “low levels and medium levels”.  That leaves high levels.

Issa promises to get to the bottom of it.

Share

OBL Photoshop Contest (Updated with New Entries)

A photoshop contest of sorts has broken out in the blogosphere.

Since Obama is intent on coddling the fragile psyches of Islamic extremists, it’s up to the web’s best photoshoppers to create a close facsimile of what Osama’s last mugshot might have looked like, to satisfy America’s need for closure .

Here’s my submission:

It gets a even more graphic below the fold…

Read the rest of this entry »

Marc Thiessen: Obama Owes CIA Interrogators Thanks And Apology

Marc A. Thiessen served in the Bush administration as chief speechwriter to the president and to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

His book, Courting Disaster (How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama Is Inviting the Next Attack), published Jan 2010, revealed how enhanced interrogation techniques (including waterboarding) saved us from numerous would-be terrorist attacks, and provided evidence  to prove the tactics used by the CIA were effective, lawful and morally just.

In his latest Washington Post oped, Thiessen challenges Obama to apologize to the honorable interrogators who kept us safe:

U.S officials have acknowledged that the key piece of intelligence that led the CIA to bin Laden — information on the al-Qaeda leader’s principal courier — came from detainees in CIA custody. .

On his second day in office, Obama shut down the CIA’s high-value interrogation program. His Justice Department then reopened criminal investigations into the conduct of CIA interrogators — inquiries that had been closed years before by career prosecutors who concluded that there were no crimes to prosecute. In a speech at the National Archives, Obama eviscerated the men and women of the CIA, accusing them of “torture” and declaring that their work “did not advance our war and counterterrorism efforts — they undermined them.”

Now, it turns out that the very CIA interrogators whose lives Obama turned upside down played a critical role in what the president rightly calls “the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al Qaeda.”

It is time for a public apology.

U.S officials have acknowledged that the key piece of intelligence that led the CIA to bin Laden — information on the al-Qaeda leader’s principal courier — came from detainees in CIA custody.

***

Thanks to President Obama, this program, which helped lead us to bin Laden, is no longer part of America’s counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, outside of the war zones of Afghanistan and Iraq, there have been no reported U.S. detentions of high-value terrorists since Obama took office. Earlier this year, Umar Patek, the highest-ranking terrorist captured alive at this point in the Obama administration, was taken into custody by Pakistani authorities. Patek had traveled from Southeast Asia to Abbottabad — the same place where bin Laden was hiding. Coincidence? What was Patek doing in Abbottabad? With whom did he meet and what did they discuss? He should be in CIA custody answering such questions.

The time has come for Obama to restore the CIA interrogation program that made bin Laden’s demise possible — and to instruct Eric Holder to end his witch hunt against the heroes who helped lead us to bin Laden’s lair. That is the least Obama can do for the men and women responsible for the crowning achievement of his presidency. They don’t deserve a special prosecutor, Mr. President. They deserve the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Maybe, tomorrow after Obama spikes the ball at Ground Zero, he’ll have  a few gracious words to say about George Bush’s role in all this, and  he’ll have a few words of appreciation for the CIA interrogator’s hard work.

But then again, if Jay Carney’s answers at Wednesday’s press conference are any indication, the administration is gonna stand by its standard Dem-Socialist operating procedure,  making sure no damn Republican gets any credit what-so-ever.

It’s all about “the messaging”, people:

Jay Carney in his press conference is claiming that no single piece of information was critical, and futhermore “we can never know” where information came from — to avoid admitting the information came from waterboarding.

This last point is particularly a lie. It’s not that “we can never know” — it’s that “they will never tell.”

That’s an entirely different matter. Obama simply refuses to acknowledge what his CIA head confirms, because his political position is wrong.

I doubt the CIA will be hearing any apology from Obama….

Charles Martel Called. He Said “Enjoy Dhimitude.”

“The risks of release outweigh the benefits,” he said. “Conspiracy theorists around the world will just claim the photos are doctored anyway, and there is a real risk that releasing the photos will only serve to inflame public opinion in the Middle East.”

Ummmm, Hello?

The only way this premise even comes close to being credible is if you believed that we were dealing with reasonable people in the first place.

Reasonable people don’t fly jetliners into skyscrapers. Reasonable people do not celebrate the deaths of 3000 whose only crime was being American and going to work that morning. Reasonable people do not demand that everyone always defers to their “unique” sensibilities, and utter about the peace of their world view. while raping and beheading those who don’t share it and issuing religious death warrants for those who criticise it.

In short, why do we fear enraging the perpetually enraged? Are they going to be more enraged? Will that make them more dangerous than they already are? This is more political correctness run amuck. It is the same kind of thinking that says the concept of a “hate crime” is a sound one…the idea that a crime is somehow more criminal based on the identity of a victim.

We scored a victory on Sunday. We showed that when you attack us and murder thousands of our citizens in an unprovoked attack, we will reach out and touch you, and time and subterfuge will not weaken our resolve. And this decision renders that moment of triumph to ash, because if we choose timidity when the moment calls for a clear deterrent, then these turds in the world’s punchbowl have won. It shows they have more committment than our leadership does when our leaders chose to defer to the bad guys’ sensibilities rather than treating them like the bad actors they are.  It is a surrender to fear and lets the enemy know that they have control of the message.

Cross-posted at Taxes, Stupidity and Death.

Linked by Michelle Malkin in Buzzworthy, thanks!

Just One More Situation Room Photoshop…

The Atlantic calls it “The Situation Room meme”:

… it was only a matter of time before the photoshoppers went to work on the iconic image, using it as grist for the always-grinding humor mill of the Internet. Already, Keanu Reeves, the grumpy flower girl, a velociraptor, and the shocked cat have been edited into the photo. The Situation Room has been colonized. It is part of our world. Take a look for yourself.

Click here for slide show.

This one’s called “every meme ever”:

Except it’s NOT every meme ever. They left one crucial meme out, and as usual, it’s up to Nice Deb to fill the void:


How can you do an  “every meme ever” photoshop without the scene stealing squirrel, for crying out loud?

Previous squirrel sightings:

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Narcissus Meets Squirrel

Well, Duh

Sunday Silliness

Obama Rescues Economy!

New White House Party Crashers Photo Emerges

Sorry, Had To Be Done

Scene Stealing Squirrel Crashes ObamaCare Photo-op

Confirmed: White House Passed Out White Coats To Docs

Scene Stealing Pest Crashes MTV Video Music Awards

Scene Stealing Squirrel Crashes Obama’s Town Hall

Linked by Michelle Malkin in Buzzworthy, thanks!




The Chicago Way: Obama Administration’s Cronyism Reaches New Heights

Or as Timothy P. Carney at The Washington Examiner put it: ‘Before we give you that contract, we’ll just need to see how much you’ve spent to re-elect the President’

As part of an application for a government contract, the White House wants to require the company to report all the company’s political activity. The administration presents this as a way to increase transparency. It strikes me as a way to further politicize the process of government contracts.

(Kinda reminds me of the politicized process in which Chrysler dealerships were targeted in the Spring of 2009 when the Obama administration was nationalizing the car industry.)

This executive order appears to be another White House end-run around Congress because it failed to pass The Disclose Act. The Hill reports:

The draft order seems geared toward non-profit groups that spent vast sums campaigning in the last election without disclosing their donors. Contributions to parties and candidates are already covered by Federal Election Commission rules, but donations to non-profit groups are not.

The draft order is similar to the Disclose Act, legislation that would have required donor disclosure that stalled in the Senate after being passed by the House in the last Congress.

How’s this for doublespeak:

A White House official defended the executive order, saying the president wants to encourage transparency and accountability.

“The President is committed to an overhaul of government contracting policies to promote accountability, transparency and competition. Taxpayers deserve to feel confident that federal contracting decisions are based on merit alone and are not influenced by political favoritism,” the official said. “That said, this document is a draft [executive order] that is still moving through the standard review and feedback process. It is not a final document. But the President is committed to bringing more accountability and transparency to a federal contracting system that has long needed reform.”

***

Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen, said the draft order is designed to counter the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision last year, which allows corporations and unions to spend unlimited funds on electioneering activities.

Obama’s executive order would not have any effect on unions of course.

(The Hill) — House Republicans on the Energy and Commerce Committee raised concerns at a Tuesday hearing that White House staffers hold meetings at a nearby Caribou Coffee to avoid disclosure requirements.

“White House staff apparently purposely schedule meetings at the Caribou Coffee around the corner from the White House so that those meetings won’t show up on the White House logs,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Calif.), chairman of the Oversight subcommittee.

Republicans portrayed the White House as failing to live up to campaign promises on transparency.

These secret meetings at Caribou Coffee have been going on for awhile, as Scotty Starnes reported last June:

What else would you expect from the Hope and Change White House. Obama, as a candidate and as President, spoke out against lobbyists and their close ties to Washington. Obama was going to change this status-quo but it is just another lie from the lips of a typical politician.

The New York Times is reporting that members of the Obama administration are meeting with lobbyists across the street at a Caribou Coffee shop and believe this excludes them from breaking the disclosure law.

There are no Secret Service agents posted next to the barista and no presidential seal on the ceiling, but the Caribou Coffee across the street from the White House has become a favorite meeting spot to conduct Obama administration business.

Here at the Caribou on Pennsylvania Avenue, and a few other nearby coffee shops, White House officials have met hundreds of times over the last 18 months with prominent K Street lobbyists — members of the same industry that President Obama has derided for what he calls its “outsized influence” in the capital.

On the agenda over espressos and lattes, according to more than a dozen lobbyists and political operatives who have taken part in the sessions, have been front-burner issues like Wall Street regulation, health care rules, federal stimulus money, energy policy and climate control — and their impact on the lobbyists’ corporate clients.

But because the discussions are not taking place at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they are not subject to disclosure on the visitors’ log that the White House releases as part of its pledge to be the “most transparent presidential administration in history.”

All this is being done because Obama doesn’t want the taxpayers to know that lobbyist and special interests groups are forming his policies. You know, like his stimulus and ObamaCare.

(…Or draft orders designed to counter the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.)

It’s just another example of the Obama pattern. Pick a strawman, like lobbyists, and make the taxpayers believe you are against them. Then in secret, work with them to screw the taxpayers.

Video: Panetta Admits Intelligence Gathered From Waterboarded Detainees Used To Track Down Osama bin Laden

Via Weasel Zippers:

WASHINGTON — Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News on Tuesday.

“Enhanced interrogation techniques” were used to extract information that led to the mission’s success, Panetta said during an interview with anchor Brian Williams. Those techniques included waterboarding, he acknowledged.

Agreeing with Panetta , Rumsfeld told Hannity, Tuesday evening that  “anyone who suggests that… waterboarding didn’t produce an enormous amount of valuable intelligence – just. isn’t. facing. the truth.”

Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers