Raucous in the Caucus – Will Santorum Squeak Out a Win? (News Round-up)

He’s the guy with all the momentum and as Quin Hillyer says,  Santorum’s Appeal Isn’t Just “Social”. It’s across the board.

If Rick Santorum comes in first or a strong second tomorrow in Iowa, the establishment media will fall all over themselves “explaining” that it was all those “social conservatives” in Iowa who did it for him. Certainly, his consistency on social issues will merit a great deal of the credit. But that’s hardly the whole story. As Rich Lowry at National Review has pointed out, one reason Santorum is “connecting” is that, alone among the candidates, he so seamlessly ties the “family issues” of “social” policy into the “family issues” of economic policy — in short, he shows how they are connected. He has always done as much. That’s why he always did so well in a tough district and a tough state in Pennsylvania, where he “connected” well in four straight races with blue-collar voters, or, put another way, with “Reagan Democrats” as well as Republicans.

RS McCain, in Iowa covering the caucuses,  filed a very affecting report at The American Spectator:

Several members of Santorum’s South Carolina team have come to Iowa to aid in the final push here, and one of them told me during an event Monday, “I’m laughing at all the media that keeps saying Rick doesn’t have any organization in South Carolina. He’s campaigned in South Carolina more than any other candidate has.… All we needed was a spark, and it looks like we got one.”

That spark seems to have started a wildfire for Santorum here in Iowa, where a strong showing might be the first step toward one of the most remarkable comebacks in America political history. Santorum’s surge could begin to redeem the pain his family suffered when he was defeated for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006. (Jeffrey Lord recalls that campaign in his American Spectator column about Santorum today.) It was one of the worst wipeouts in the history of the Republican Party, which lost control of Congress in a landslide election driven largely by the unpopularity of the war in Iraq. Election Night 2006 was a painful one for many Republican, but for few was it more painful than for Santorum and his family. As the senator gave his concession speech that night, TV news cameras zoomed in on eight-year-old Sarah, who clung to a doll and wept uncontrollably. Sarah’s tears were mocked by liberal commentators, but inspired a songwriter to compose a tune that was recorded by country music star Martina McBride, the chorus of which says, “Blessed be the child who turns a loving eye and stops to pray for these times in which we live.”

Sarah Santorum and the rest of her family have been praying for many years, and tonight in Iowa they will wait for an answer to their prayers.

Read the whole thing from start to finish. I had to wipe away a couple of tears, myself.

SEE ALSO:The Other McCain Remember the Crying Girl? With pictures.

You’ve probably been hearing all about the brouhaha over Alan Colmes’ despicable remarks concerning how the Santorums handled the death of their newborn in 1996. The usually even-keeled Rick Moran called Colmes a “heartless monster”  and if you haven’t yet seen  video of the confrontation between the morally outraged Rich Lowrey and the simpering, unapologetic Colmes, it is a must see.

Pundette called it, “A new low”:

I never liked Rich Lowry more than here in his exchange with Alan Colmes, who went to a very, very wrong place in his attempt to crazify Rick Santorum:

Any commentator who trawls for talking points at the Democratic Underground should be blacklisted from all respectable networks. That, of course leaves job opportunities open for him at MSNBC or Current TV.

In light of all this, it’s almost unfathomable that anyone would accuse Santorum, the father of seven, and the author of Partial Birth Abortion Ban,  “pro-choice”, yet it happened.

Fox News reports:

Ron Paul is disgusting,” presidential candidate Rick Santorum said to a handful of Fox News and Business reporters shortly after his Fox and Friends interview Tuesday morning.

Santorum blamed his rival for Iowa robo calls that claimed that the former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania was Pro-Choice and against the second amendment.

More excellent on-the-ground gonzo-reporting from McCain, here: Desperate Hours in the Hawkeye State.

The video of Santorum’s wife breaking down as he discusses miscarriage:

Jim Geraghty: Three Factors to Watch Tonight

Batesline: Iowa caucuses: In defense of “arcane rules”

Predictions:

Eye of Polyphemus: Iowa Caucus Predictions

DaTechGuy’s Blog: The first day that actually counts in Iowa

Nate Silver: Why I’d Bet on Santorum (and Against My Model)

Ben_Howe: Santorum 26% Paul 23% Romney 18% Gingrich 10% Bachmann 6%
Linked by Michelle Malkin, thanks!
About these ads

10 Responses to “Raucous in the Caucus – Will Santorum Squeak Out a Win? (News Round-up)”

  1. Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere Says:

    Knowing what Colmes said was bad enough.

    Watching him really set my jaw grinding.

    1. It means zero in relation to how he would perform his duties, despite the maggot’s attempt to characterize it as a “judgement” issue.

    2. It is plain to see that he doesn’t think he’s said anything wrong. I find the dichotomy of the liberal mind to be freightening. We must all provide health care to everyone at all costs, or if you don’t you want people “dying in the streets”, but their lack of consideration and compassion for the baby humans, and their importance and role in the family doesn’t strike them at all as incongruent.

  2. Pre-Caucus Night Nap Time : The Other McCain Says:

    [...] O’Neil Tyler.Bob Belvedere at The Camp Of The Saints is ready for the apocalyptic year of 2012.Nice Deb suggests the possibility of the impossible, which is the kind of hope I’ve sworn to avoid. If it happens, I’ll be surprised, but [...]

  3. just a conservative girl Says:

    My prediction was originally 3rd for Santorum, but I think ironically that Colmes may have helped him. I still don’t think he will win, but will be in the top three.

  4. nicedeb Says:

    I’m hoping for a Santorum win. I would be disappointed if Romney won, but it would be obscene if Ron Paul ended up winning.

  5. IOWA: Where The Hawkeye Pierces The GOP « The Camp Of The Saints Says:

    [...] Deb has a great round-up of some of the things that have been happening in the past few days, including some good stuff on [...]

  6. Rick Santorum: Cinderella-Man | FavStocks Says:

    [...] I asked, will Santorum squeak out a win? – I really didn’t expect it to be this close. Forget statistical tie –  five points [...]

  7. I come not to piss on Alan Colmes | BitsBlog Says:

    [...] Nice Deb: You’ve probably been hearing about the brouhaha over Alan Colmes’ despicable remarks about how [...]

  8. Ralph Gizzip Says:

    Ron Paul definitely deserves a seat at the table… just not the seat at the head of the table.

  9. FMJRA 2.0: Bikelock Trident : The Other McCain Says:

    [...] InsurrectionDaily PunditThe (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely ConservativeGay PatriotScared MonkeysNice DebThe ConservatoryDa Tech GuyNice DebRight Wing NewsPirates CoveObi`s SisterStop The ACLUThe [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,592,511 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 509 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: