Krauthammer on Morell Testimony: ‘It’s Passing Strange That CIA Analysts’ Account on Benghazi Was Precisely The Cover Story Obama WH Needed’ (Video)

Former CIA Acting Director Michael J. Morell testified Wednesday morning before the House Intelligence Committee on his role in the shaping of the administration’s widely discredited talking points on Benghazi. Republicans have been saying that Morell’s past accounts of his role on Benghazi were “often misleading and sometimes deliberately false.”

Republicans got few answers at the hearing, but a lot denials of wrongdoing. “I never allowed politics to influence what I said or did. Never,” the 33 year veteran of the agency who has served both Republican and Democrat presidents insisted.

Morell testified that he was deeply troubled by allegations “that I inappropriately altered and influenced CIA’s classified analysis and its unclassified talking points about what happened in Benghazi, Libya in September 2012 and that I covered up those actions.”

“These allegations accuse me of taking these actions for the political benefit of President Obama and then Secretary of State Clinton. These allegations are false,” Morell said.

When Congressman Jeff Miller (R-FL) asked Morell if he complained to the White House following Susan Rice’s appearances on the five Sunday talk shows, he said that he did not complain to anybody.

Morell affirmed that he read the email the CIA Station Chief in Libya had sent him on September 15, informing him that the attack was “not an escalation of protests.”

The Special Report Panel discussed Morell’s testimony, Wednesday evening. Steven Hayes made note of the different stories that the former Deputy CIA Director has told. He said he expected more contrition from Morell about lying (by omission) to Congress when they questioned him about the talking points. There were two substantive pieces of information that came out at the hearing, Hayes said – that the video narrative came from the White House, and the other thing was that he said that the agency had taken the word of CIA analysts over eye witnesses on the ground. No matter how hard he spinned that at the hearing, he was unable to not make it seem absurd.

The Hill’s AB Stoddard said, “I was really surprised how completely confused, beyond inconsistant he was. It’s really beyond disconcerting. He couldn’t get to contrition because he really countered himself so many times it’s unbelievable.”

Krauthammer said, “It’s a curious coincidence that when he decides to ignore what he’s hearing from the people on the ground who are right there, who can actually see what’s going on – who are communicating on the ground live while it’s happening to other people, he decides that evidence is going to be ignored and he goes with an analyst in Langley whom he said — was not aware of eyewitness accounts… It is passing strange that the account of the analysts in Langley is precisely the cover story that will get the White House off the hook.”

 

About these ads

5 Responses to “Krauthammer on Morell Testimony: ‘It’s Passing Strange That CIA Analysts’ Account on Benghazi Was Precisely The Cover Story Obama WH Needed’ (Video)”

  1. Liberty At'Stake Says:

    “analyst in Langley ” = visitor from Team Hillary with offer Morell couldn’t refuse?

  2. nicedeb Says:

    Right, let’s get to the bottom of this. Who are these unnamed CIA analysts that are getting all the blame now for the phony talking points. It’s time they start naming names. Morell is a weasel. I believe he’s lying about who took the al Qaeda mentions out of the talking points. That was him, too – to protect Hillary..

  3. gds44 Says:

    Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.

  4. Geo Says:

    Yeah, I believe him. Isn’t this the same guy who told Lindsey Lohan that it was the FBI who removed the material? Then when Lindsey called the FBI to verify they called boolshit on it and said it wasn’t us. If you can’t get one over on Lindsey who the hell can you get one over on?

    The republicans need to start lining up some people from this administration and start charging them with perjury. Clapper or Morel would be a very good start, then we can proceed from there.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,587,009 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 507 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: