Jeanine Pirro To Obama: Why Is It You Apologize To Muslims and Lie To Americans? (Video)

Oh my God. Did Obama really say “we are out there trying to hunt down the folks who carried this out, and we are trying to make sure we fix the system so it doesn’t happen again”?! Well, he did, obviously – it’s right there on the tape, but I sure missed that, last week. Good Lord. He was talking about the IRS – not Benghazi – but using the same robotic spiel. He memorized his lines for  the last scandal so well, he’s using the same ones for the new scandal.   And Pirro of course made the obvious point after watching this clown show dither for nine months : “Weren’t you going to do that with Benghazi?” It gets better from there.

Pirro’s opening statement’s are always outstanding – this one is spectacular. She blistered the Regime relentlessly from start to finish.

“Why Is It You Apologize To Muslims and Lie To Americans?” She asked at the end of her statement.

“Why is it that you use the IRS to silence political dissent and the DOJ to threaten the press?”

“Why is it that you mobilize the IRS to go after political enemies but you can’t mobilize troops to save  American lives in Benghazi?”

Enjoy:

Video via Massteaparty

Pirro had on former Atty Gen Michael Mukasey to discuss Holder’s hearing, last week.

Video via Massteaparty

Video: A Thursday Night Scandalpalooza

I would usually save these for my Saturday Movie Matinee, some of these videos are too good to wait until Saturday.

Especially good is Judge Jeanine Pirro’s opening monologue from her show, last weekend:  Obama Admin Lied To America!!

Mark Levin: Investigate Senate Democrat Carl Levin:

Mark Levin: Obama Scandals Are Examples of a Tyrannical Government:

Mediaite: Megyn Kelly Explodes At Liberal Guest Over Benghazi – ‘Come On! Can We Have Some Honesty?’

Out Come The Baseball Bats – TheBlaze:

 Intim-O-Gate – TheBlaze:

The President Knows Nothing – TheBlaze:

Obama Drama - TheBlazeTV – The Glenn Beck Radio Program – 2013.05.15:

Donald Rumsfeld – TheBlazeTV - The Glenn Beck Radio Program – 2013.05.15:

Dana Loesch v. Leslie Marshall Debate IRS Scandal on Sean Hannity – 5-16-13

Listen to the shamelessly hacktastic Jay Carney try to spin the Benghazi talking points release into a “victory” for the administration, calling the concern over the WH lies a  ”faux controversy” drummed up by Republicans: Piers Morgan Grills Jay Carney About IRS, Benghazi: Has This Been ‘Your Toughest Week’ Ever?

ABC’s Jonathan Karl reports on the Obama Administration’s Release Benghazi Emails:

Hat tip Brian B for many of these videos.

Krauthammer: Obama “Understands He’s Losing His Constituency – The Media” (Video)

On Special Report, tonight, Charles Krauthammer characterized Obama’s short presser as a “holding operation” because Obama understands he’s losing his core constituency – the media.

“That was the absolute minimum he could have done, he said. He relieves one person – he obviously had to – he had to relieve at least one person and he chose, of course, the acting commissioner.”

The funny thing about that is,  Steven Miller, the “Fired” Acting IRS Commissioner Was Set To Resign… in June.

And who even cares? He had little to do with the IRS harassment of conservatives, anyway. He was hired in November of 2012, two years into the IRS’s targeting of conservatives for political reasons.  The SOB who lied to Congress is Doug Shulman, seen here telling the House Ways & Means Subcommittee that his agency was not engaged in the targeting of tea party organizations even while they doing it hot and heavily.

Said Krauthammer of Obama’s statement:

And then he says there’s going to be an investigation from Treasury. Well, that just means that the left hand of the government investigating the right hand. He did say he’d cooperate with Congress, but then he has the chutzpa to essentially warn republicans not to make this into a political event.

[W]e’re talking about is the IRS applying political criteria — inexcusably, unconstitutionally, probably criminally — and deciding who it’s going to investigate.

“I found this the bare minimum,” he concluded. “It’ll hold them for 12 hours, but no more.”

Video via Greg Hengler, Townhall.

By the way, Krauthammer wasn’t the first person to call the media Obama’s “most important constituency”, today. That honor goes to Lisa Myers, this morning.

UPDATE May 17:

Oh I take back what I said about Miller, earlier. Based on his evasive testimony in front of the House Ways and Means Committee, today, this weasel is knee deep in this scandal.

 

Friday-Free- For All: Fox Hosts Slam MSM Media Hacks For Helping Regime Cover Up Benghazi Scandal

   Via Mediaite:  The Five Hosts Blast ‘Media Hacks’ Maddow, Stewart, Colbert For ‘Covering Up’ The Benghazi ‘Cover-Up’

One day after accusing the media of acting as President Obama’s “scandal condom” on the Benghazi story, The Five’s Greg Gutfeld was at it again, this time calling MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert “media hacks” for their highly critical commentary on Fox News’ coverage.
“People died, but what difference does it make?” Gutfeld said sarcastically, echoing Hillary Clinton’s infamous Benghazi hearing question. “The story will probably die, like the four in Benghazi with the lapdog media standing down, making these so-called journalists co-conspirators in the Benghazi cover-up, and that’s comedy when you’re winning.” He summed up the position of Maddow, Stewart and Colbert like this: “They refuse to actually cover the story. Instead, they want to cover people who care about the story, because then that kind of absolves them from having to deal with the ugliness.”

Via Mediaite: O’Reilly And Bernie Goldberg Tear Into Benghazi Media Bias: MSNBC Is White House’s ‘Public Relations Firm’:

Bill O’Reilly brought on Bernard Goldberg tonight to analyze how much the media has covered Benghazi in the aftermath of yesterday’s big hearing. O’Reilly noted how Fox News gave it the most coverage, the nightly newscasts gave it a few minutes of coverage, and MSNBC pretty much ignored it. Goldberg said that MSNBC ignoring the story basically makes the network no more than a “public relations firm” in the employ of President Obama and the Democratic party.

O’Reilly cited statistics showing that Fox News covered the hearing live for almost two hours, CNN for roughly fifteen minutes, and MSNBC for absolutely no time at all. He pointed out that all of the network newscasts led with the big news story from Cleveland, but the CBS Evening News had the most coverage, clocking in at almost five minutes. The morning shows had similarly minimal coverage.

Here’s Goldberg’s oped: Jodi Arias, Cable TV, and a Nation Fascinated by Shiny Objects:

There are times, not many thankfully, when I get depressed, brought down by the sorry evidence that we live in a country fixated on shiny objects.  This is one of those times.

A jury in Phoenix has found Jodi Arias guilty of first-degree murder.  That’s not what gets me down.  What I find so depressing is our collective fascination with trivia, with anything that we can follow without having to actually think.

Media Mash Mainstream Media Spin – The Propaganda Networks – Hannity – Ted Cruz:

Jack Cashill wonders Has Hillary Told One Lie Too Many? Or will the MSM help drag her over the finish line in 2016?

By 2012, the major media had become so comfortable with Clinton lies that not a single one among them pointed out the grotesque irony of having an unrepentant sexual predator keynote a Democratic Convention whose theme was the “Republican war on women.”

So accustomed had Hillary grown to having her lies glossed over that she grew increasingly indignant even at the timid questions Congress threw her way at the January 2013 Benghazi hearing.

When asked by Senator Ron Johnson about her version of events, Hillary exploded in an outburst destined to be at least as famous as her “vast right wing conspiracy” jeremiad.

Said Hillary, summing up the state of public integrity in 2013, “What difference at this point does it make?” Say what you will, but as recently as January that was a legitimate question.

To be sure, Benghazi will damage Hillary, at least in the short run. But come the Iowa Caucus in 2016, look for the media to champion version 2.0 of the “Comeback Kid.” They have too much emotional equity invested in Hillary to do otherwise.

NRO: Krauthammer called the State Department response to the Benghazi hearing, “pathetic”:

Charles Krauthammer called State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell’s response to the Benghazi Hearing “pathetic.” Ventrell told reporters earlier today, ”We don’t believe that new information was necessarily presented that hadn’t been already either entered into the public record through congressional testimony or investigated by the ARB or otherwise looked at.”

Thursdays With Michelle Malkin – Benghazi Whistleblowers Speak Out – Fox & Friends – 5-9-13:

The Right Scoop: “A disgrace!” – Mark Levin says Hillary Clinton was NOT sworn in at House testimony in January:

Mark Levin says that Hillary Clinton was NOT made to take the oath back in January when she appeared before a House committee to testify on Benghazi and he says it’s a disgrace and a crying shame.

Ted Cruz: Benghazi Eight Months Later:

“What difference at this point does it make?” Secretary Clinton responded in January to questions about the nature of the Benghazi attack. “Let’s put this behind us,” Secretary of State John Kerry complained last month. Last week, White House spokesman Jay Carney dismissed press inquiries about the attack by saying, “Benghazi was a long time ago.”

But many more questions remain. Here are a dozen:

• Why was the State Department unwilling to provide the requested level of security to Benghazi?
• Were there really no military assets available to provide relief during the seven hours of the attacks? If so, why not? During the attacks, were any military assets ordered to stand down?
• If the secretary of defense thought there was “no question” this was a coordinated terrorist attack, why did Ambassador Susan Rice, Secretary Clinton, and President Obama all tell the American people that the cause was a “spontaneous demonstration” about an Internet video?
• Why did the State Department edit the intelligence talking points to delete the references to “Islamic extremists” and “al Qa’ida”?
• Why did the FBI release pictures of militants taken the day of the attack only eight months after the fact? Why not immediately, as proved so effective in the Boston bombing?
• Why have none of the survivors testified to Congress?
• Why is the administration apparently unaware of the whistle-blowers who have been attempting to tell their stories? Is it true that these career civil servants have been threatened with retaliation?
• Did President Obama sleep the night of September 11, 2012? Did Secretary Clinton?
• When was President Obama told about the murder of our ambassador? About the murder of all four Americans? What did he do in response?
• What role, if any, did the State Department’s own counterterrorism office play during the attacks and in their immediate aftermath?
• Why was Secretary Clinton not interviewed for the ARB report?
• And why, if all relevant questions were answered in the ARB report, has the State Department’s own inspector-general office opened a probe into the methods of that very report?

The All American Blogger: New Video: The Truth About Benghazi Matters:

On to other subjects…

The Other McCain: Hope and Chains: #WarOnWomen Kidnapper Is Cuyahoga County Democrat:

“If any of the brothers were a Republican, this news would have been trumpeted by the mainstream media as tangible proof of the Republican War on Women — a narrative invented by Democrat strategists and maintained by the media in a successful effort to defeat Republican candidates in the 2012 election cycle.
“However, when a real act of war on women is perpetrated by a Democrat voter in the manner that even the most zealous Democrat strategist couldn’t have dreamed up in their worst nightmares — involving abduction, imprisonment, rape, torture, malnutrition, beatings while pregnant, and killing babies — the media doesn’t think the party affiliation is relevant.”
– Oleg Atbashian, American Thinker, “Ariel Castro, Cleveland Kidnapper, Is a Registered Democrat”

Let’s be clear: The fact that Cleveland “house of horrors” suspect Ariel Castro is a registered Democrat does not mean either:

1. That all Democrats have rape dungeons in their basements;
   or
2. That every resident of Cuyahoga County is a sexual predator.

These are illogical inferences, and quite possibly harmful stereotypes. Some violent sex offenders might sue you for libel if you accuse them of being Cuyahoga County Democrats.

Fox News: Missouri lawmakers pass bill to nullify federal gun control laws:

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. –  The Missouri Legislature sent the governor a bill Wednesday that would expand gun rights and declare all federal gun regulations unenforceable, in a response to President Obama’s push for gun control legislation.

The Republican-led Legislature passed the measure hoping to shield the state from federal proposals that would ban assault weapons and expand background checks. But the U.S. Senate’s defeat of a background check expansion three weeks ago did nothing to assuage the fears of Missouri Republicans who pressed forward with their legislation.

The Missouri House voted 118-36 Wednesday to send the bill to Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon. The Senate passed the measure earlier this month.

The Right Scoop: MUST LISTEN: ICE Union president exposes Obama admin LIES on immigration enforcement:

This is huge. ICE Union president Chris Crane was invited on the Mark Levin Show tonight to explain how the Obama administration is cooking the books on immigration enforcement. What he said was pretty shocking.

According to Crane, ICE agents can no longer make street arrests of people they suspect to be an illegal aliens, illegal alien gang members or illegal alien criminals, despite having the authority to do so by laws enacted by Congress. He says they are under orders to wait until the illegal alien commits a crime, gets arrested by law enforcement and booked into a jail before they can even intercede.

Then they must wait until the illegal alien is convicted of 3 or more criminal offenses before they can put them in deportation process.

When it comes to cooking the immigration books, Crane says the record number of deportations that the Obama administration touts is a complete fraud. He calls it a shell game, saying what really happens is illegal aliens caught crossing the border by the Border Patrol and then sent back across are now added to ICE’s numbers of deportations, thus inflating the numbers immensely. Crane said last year over 50% of the deportations in ICE’s numbers were from those the border patrol agents caught and sent back across.

In reality, Crane says they now have the numbers to show that since 2008, the actual number of ICE deportations has plummeted since 2008.

Whistleblower Lawyer: When ARB’s General Pickering Found Out He Might Have To Deal With Hillary, He ‘Became Physically Ill’ (Video)

When the Accountability Review Board’s report on Benghazi came out, last December, John Bolton, noting that the State Dept. was basically investigating itself,  suggested that their assertions might not hold up to scrutiny. Well, that time has come. The Accountability Review Board’s findings are being savaged by attorneys who are representing material witnesses who were ignored by the ARB.

Washington power couple Victoria Toensing and her husband Joseph diGenova, who are each representing a whistleblower who will testify Wednesday at the House Oversight and Reform hearing on Benghazi, appeared on Geraldo Saturday night to talk about the case. Toensing will be representing Gregory Hicks,  Foreign Service Officer and former Deputy Chief of Mission/Chargé d’Affairs in Libya. di Genova is representing Mark Thompson, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism.

Toensing told Geraldo that “the things that her client will be saying will be contradictory to what the administration’s scenario was.”

Di Genova promised that “what will come out of the hearing is that the Accountability Review Board conducted by General Pickering and Admiral Mullen will be proven to  have been a cover-up - one of the worst jobs ever done in the history of governmental reporting….didn’t even interview the Sec. of State for their report and how you can do a Benghazi investigation and not interview the Sec of State and not interview a series of people who were intimately involved in Benghazi and asked to be interviewed and were declined to be interviewed. The Benghazi report by the ARB  is a cover up”, di Genova repeated.

According to di Genova, when Pickering was told that he was going to have to deal with the “seventh floor” – aka Hillary – he was told that the General became physically ill and didn’t want to deal with it.

“Did the government cover up the facts and circumstances that lead to the tragic deaths of four heroic Americans?” Geraldo asked.

“There were material witnesses who wanted to talk and they were not allowed to talk to the Accountability Review Board”, di Genova answered, adding that he’d like to know where the pictures and videos are of Obama on the night of the attack.

A lot of us do.

Part One

Part Two

In Judge Jeanine Pirro’s opening monologue, she compared the Regime’s handling of the  Boston Bombing to Benghazi…

She interviewed Rep James Lankford (R – OK) from the House Oversight and Reform Committee.

All videos via Massteaparty

SEE ALSO: 

Doug Ross:  DAMNING: The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format

Jeanine Pirro Excoriates Mama Jihadi and the Obama Regime in a Rant for the Ages (Video)

Judge Jeanine Pirro’s opening statement on Saturday’s ‘Justice’  was a rant for the ages, and I suspect she speaks for a great many Americans, including me.

She didn’t pull any punches as she excoriated mama jihadi for her for having the audacity to complain about America after what her sons did,  and the Obama Regime  for their failures in the war on terror.

Transcript via Fox News:

In New York Harbor stands a mighty woman with a torch, beckoning the huddled masses yearning to breathe free, and the wretched refuse from tempest tossed shores to her as she lifts her lamp beside the golden door.

And they were by all accounts just that — a family fleeing a tyrannical government.  A family seeking political asylum.  The very people to whom that mighty woman holds out her welcoming torch.

This week, as America wakens from the nightmare visited upon Boston, as many painfully start the long road to recovery, we begin to comprehend the enormity of the violence that was visited upon us.

The Tsarnaev family — a father, mother, two sons — were granted political asylum in 2002. We opened our arms to them. Showered them with food, money, housing, education and all the freedoms of American citizens.

And look at how we were repaid.

Here’s how Tamerlan’s mother describes her son.

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva: “But, all around, he was really nice, and he never rejected anyone American just because they’re Americans.”

Really? He never rejected anyone American?

After opening our arms to you, we should be grateful that you and your terrorist son didn’t reject us?

Does that sound like a mother already devastated by the death of one son?  Or a woman on her own radical jihad, willing to sacrifice yet another son in honor of their god?

And get this one:

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva: “Why didn’t you send him to Guantanamo or whatever? Why? Why? Why did they have to kill him?”

Why didn’t they send him to Guantanamo?  So now you knew he was a Muslim jihadist?  That you raised a Muslim jihadist? If he’s innocent, why would he even need to go to Guantanamo?

Take a look at this one:

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva: “Why did I even go there? Why? I thought America is going to, like, protect us, our kids; it’s going to be safe. […] America took my kids away from me!”

America took your sons from you?

They injured more than 200.  Blinded, deafened, and blew legs and arms off of innocent civilians. Turning the city of Boston into a locked-down war zone of casualties, amputees, and a future of post-traumatic stress.

And America should protect you?

Your sons killed Americans.

We’re the ones who needed protection.

And you ask why did I even go there?  I’ll tell you why. You came to suck the fat of our land.

To take our money.

To educate your terrorist sons.

To steal from us.

To go on public assistance.

To get housing and food stamps.

While you’re driving your Mercedes Benz. All the while, your family’s going back and forth to the very country from which you claimed political refuge.

Did you guys lie on that petition?  By the way — that’s perjury.

And then, you’re a thief and you’re charged with theft.  You’re put on a terror watch list.  Your son is charged with beating a girlfriend.  Your other son is a pot head.  Neither of them working or employed — traveling back and forth.

Most Americans can’t even afford a vacation.  They’re losing their homes.  If they’re lucky enough to have a job, they live check to check.  The elderly choose between food and medicine.  Servicemen and women are getting cuts in their benefits.

And when hardworking Americans want to know how you guys can afford this, the governor of Massachusetts refuses to reveal what kind of taxpayer assistance Tamerlan got on grounds of privacy.

Privacy? What privacy?

Governor, you take our money and give it to this guy, and you want to protect his privacy?  You want to protect his rights?

He’s dead. He’s a terrorist. He has no rights. But it’s okay to invade my privacy, and publish my name and where I live on an interactive map, because I am a lawful gun owner.

And now, mother of Islamic jihadis — the Obama administration, at break-neck speed rushes in a federal judge.  Stops the FBI in the middle of an interrogation to arraign your son and shower him with even more rights.

The right to remain silent. The right to an attorney. Unparalleled medical care. All the protections of the American Constitution.

Why?

Because the president and his buddy, Eric Holder, want the world to think better of us.  They want the world to see the American justice system at its best.

Really? They hate us. They chant death to America. They burn us in effigy and we give them billions, and F-16′s, and armored tanks.

As they laugh their way to the bank and the airfield.

And when they kill us, we don’t even send in reinforcements for our own, fighting for eight hours in Benghazi.

And we want them to like us?

Honestly? I don’t much care about what the world thinks of us or our criminal justice system.

They come here to kill us and we worry about what they think of us?

I don’t want to show the rest of the world how our justice system works.  I honestly don’t give a damn.

They say you’re planning on coming here.  But hope springs eternal, and maybe the system will work and that watch list you’re on will stop you.

But I imagine they’ll let you in.  And if they do, I can only pray that they’ll activate that outstanding bench warrant against you for larceny.

And what’s that? You can’t afford an attorney?  Too damn bad.

And I have an idea.  You and your son should be stripped of your citizenship, tried in a military tribunal in Guantanamo.

Lady, you should not be allowed here.

We don’t want you here.  We should not be required to breathe the same air as you.

We should not be required to suffer the indignity of your presence.

A counterpoint brought to you via  ”the undertaker”: Alan Colmes urges sympathy for Tsarnaevs’ anti-American, ‘grieving mother’…

He’s just “not gonna beat up on a grieving mother”:

Trey Gowdy: Benghazi Hearings ‘Coming Quickly,’ And Will Be ‘Explosive’ (Video)

On Saturday, Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), told Fox host Uma Pemmaraju, more hearings on Benghazi are on the way and he promised that they will be “explosive.”

There are four hearings coming, and they are coming quickly, he said. The hearings are going to look into the failure of security, what happened during the siege itself, and the aftermath.

“We all now know that what Susan Rice said was demonstrably false, Gowdy noted. “There’s not a person left in the Western hemisphere that believes that what she said was accurate. The question is whether she was just grossly negligent or there was an intentional misleading, and secondarily, there remains the prospect that this administration’s decision to blame it on a video may have actually may have impacted negatively on our ability to get answers in the aftermath.”

As for the potential for the hearings to be “explosive”, Gowdy hinted that witnesses who were on the scene, and have been hidden by the Regime, would testify at the hearings.

“Well Uma, I am bound by certain measures of confidentiality, but I would tell you that you are getting very warm…” he answered when she asked if  some of the witnesses might be there.

He said folks will want to follow these hearings very closely.

Video: Greg Gutfeld And The Five Dissect And Expose Muslim Extremism And its Apologists

After a full week of watching the left go from trying to blame the tea party for the Boston bombing, to cautioning people not to speculate about motives once the suspects were identified, to actually making excuses for them, The Five’s Greg Gutfeld has had enough.

“What do hacks do when they’re wrong about terror?” Gutfeld asked.  ”They cling to relativism. Yes, Muslim extremism is no different than any other kind of extremism – but in order to make that stick, you’ve got to really suck at math.”

I think he’s hit on something! Liberals are notoriously bad at math!

SEE ALSO: 

The Conversation: News Alert: Boston Marathon Bombing Suspects Motivated by Religion not Ben Affleck Movies:

Via the AP:

Two U.S. officials say preliminary evidence from an interrogation suggests the suspects in the Boston Marathon attack were motivated by religion but were apparently not tied to any Islamic terrorist groups.

Someone alert MSNBC host, Melissa Harris Perry, because over the weekend, she bloviated that Tsarnaev’s faith is about as relevant to the investigation as Ben Affleck movies.

Yes, really.

Her panel guests agreed and added that Americans have to “otherize” violent actors in order to absolve themselves from responsibility for or connection to their violence.

Actually, no. I feel no responsibility for, or connection to, what they did in Boston. Only seething anger, sadness, and revulsion – aka normal reactions.

“We don’t really know,” said Harris-Perry, throwing her hands up about the discussion into the Tsarnaev’s motives. “The younger brother, he’s getting all kinds of tweets from his friends. I think part of the answer is that it’s still an open question.”

Wrong again. By the time they had this discussion it was no longer an “open question.” It was pretty darn obvious that they were motivated by radical Islam. You had to be willfully blind not to have picked up on that, by then.

Keep reading at the link.

Jeanine Pirro: Did The FBI Drop The Ball? (Video)

At some point, someone at the FBI made the call that Tameran  Tsarnaev was not a threat.

“At the end of the day, when all this comes out we’ll have a better perspective of exactly how this transpired and and exactly what information was used here to make these judgements,” said Terry Turchie, former FBI Counter-Terrorism Division.

Unless of course the Regime stonewalls, and/or Obama invokes Executive Privilege again.

Via Massteaparty

Via Massteaparty

SEE ALSO:

Twitchy:  Jake Tapper hearing ‘crickets’ from FBI over Tamerlan Tsarnaev inquiry; House committee to seek answers

The Conversation: The Terrorists Didn’t Fail

Krauthammer on Gosnell Abortion Horror: “Tantamount to Infanticide”, Puts Pro Aborts “In A Very Bad Light” (Video)

Quoting the late Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Krauthammer called what happened at Gosnell’s clinic, “tantamount to infanticide.” He went on to say, “the fact that it’s not covered is very easily explained. It puts the pro-abortion forces in a very bad light. It’s brings the issue of late term abortion starkly into relief.”

Continuing, he explained, “here’s a place where it clearly went over the edge – clearly engaged in murder. And even the ones who are a second or two on the other side of the line, where you are destroying an infant as it is exiting the womb – it is as Moynihan indicated – murder. You can have that position and not believe that all abortions should be illegal”, he said. “I would think that there’s  room for a national consensus on this.”

Via NROVideos

Jeanine Pirro on Texas D.A. Murders: “White Supremacy Has Very Little To Do With These Murders” (Video)

On January 31, Kaufman County Assistant District Attorney Mark Hasse was gunned down in what police called  targeted attack.  He was shot multiple times while walking from the parking lot toward the county courthouse at about 8 a.m.

On Saturday morning, March 30, Kaufman County (TX)  District Attorney Mike McLelland and his wife, Cynthia were gunned down in their home.   And last week, another attorney, Jay Heilman from the southern district of Texas, withdrew from the  case the Kaufman  office was working on, citing his own security concerns.

On yesterday’s Justice, Jeanine Pirro tackled this story, and the disturbing implications it has for law enforcement in the United States.  ”The line in the sand between a civilized and lawless society has been erased”  Pirro said in her opening statement. ”Is this about racial hatred,” she asked rhetorically. “I see and I think that white supremacy has very little to do with these murders….Maybe this has more to do with business than ideology,” she said.

Video via RightSightings

SEE ALSO:

Bob Owens has been keeping a close eye on these attacks on law enforcement:

Threats after death: church having services for slain TX District Attorney received bomb threat:

We now know that even in death the McLellands were given no peace, as a bomb threat was called in the Mr. McLelland’s viewing at the First Baptist Church of Wortham:

Security was tight and schools were closed Friday in the small Freestone County town of Wortham where funeral services were being held for slain Kaufman County District Attorney Mike McLelland, 63, and his wife Cynthia, 65.

Mike McLelland grew up in Wortham and graduated from Wortham High School.

A family funeral service started at 10 a.m. Friday at the First Baptist Church of Wortham.

The McLellands will be laid to rest in Wortham Ce   metery.

Wortham police searched the church Wednesday night after authorities received a bomb threat.

A woman said her daughter was turned away from the church as she arrived for visitation Thursday evening.

No bomb was found, but the church was guarded overnight, authorities said.

 

Criminal justice under siege in Texas:

Someone or some group is at war with authorities near Dallas, TX:

District Attorney Mike McLelland, and his wife, Cynthia McLelland, were shot dead in their home two months after McLelland publicly vowed to track down the killer of Assistant District Attorney Mark Hasse, shot dead in public on January 31.

The twin killings have rocked mostly rural Kaufman County on the eastern outskirts of Dallas, and several law enforcement officials have called them a direct attack on the criminal justice system.

 

Another attempted DA killing? Intruder gunned down in Colorado prosecutor’s home:

It looks like they are trying to suggest that is was an coincidence or an attempted copycat:

The deputy district attorney made a 911 emergency call and reported that a man was at her door “behaving very erratically,” police said.

The prosecutor then told dispatchers that the stranger forced his way into her home. An altercation ensued inside and shots were fired, leaving the unidentified man dead, police said.

West Virginia Sheriff gunned down in latest attack on law enforcement

First prosecutors out west were gunned down, and now the Mingo County (WV) Sheriff has been murdered as well.

Owens reports that the Sheriff had ‘built a reputation as being very tough on drug dealers, and he was gunned down at a spot he routinely lunched at where he could keep an eye on an area that was once a “pill mill.”’

Video: Ann Coulter Decries “Epidemic” of “Wealthy People” Trying to Tell the Rest of Country Not to Carry Firearms,

Sean Hannity had Ann Coulter on his show, Monday night to talk about  Jim Carrey’s anti-gun Funny or Die video.

Asked by Hannity if she thought Carrey would make fun of African-Americans or Muslim Americans the way he mocked rural white gun owners, Coulter responded, “no, you’re allowed to make fun of white southerners and Christians in America.” She chalked Carrey’s video up as the latest example in the “epidemic” of “wealthy people” trying to tell the rest of country not to carry and own firearms, a clear allusion to Mayor Bloomberg’s gun control campaign. Linking Carrey’s video to Hannity’s assertion that the government is buying up a billion rounds of ammunition, Coulter claimed, “that’s the only question with gun control: should the government and rich elites like Bloomberg, Feinstein and Jim Carrey have a monopoly on force?”

Responding to Sean Hannity’s point about the insulting  stereotype  of the “tobacco-spitting hee-hawing, Southerner” portrayed in the video, Coulter responded, “I think it’s worth pointing out that whenever they’re running for office, they pretend to BE those hicks. You always get the fake Democrat American with hay in his hair, shooting his gun like Joe Manchin….doing square dances — oh, screw you, she laughed, “you’re Democrats!”

Hannity also got in a question about the Regime’s massive ammo buys. Coulter pointed out that after Fast and Furious, people have reason to be suspicious of this government.

“Are they just refusing to answering questions about these gun buys (some of which we know are happening, why aren’t they explaining it?) to try to induce paranoid responses from right wingers?” She asked.

“Please note, again – they can have guns, we can’t”, she concluded,  that is the only question with gun control…should the government and rich elites like Bloomberg, Feinstein and Jim Carrey have a monopoly on force?”

Video: Greg Gutfeld Reads Jim Carrey The Riot Act on “The Five”

Over the weekend, Hollywood has-been Jim Carrey unleashed a barrage of insulting tweets branding those opposed to stricter gun control “heartless motherf%ckers unwilling 2 Bend 4 the safety of our kids.”

Today, Carrey released a video called “Cold Dead Hand” as part of a “Funny or Die” skit.

In it, Carrey takes aim at the legendary “Ten Commandments” actor and former NRA executive Charlton Heston, saying that because Heston owned guns, the angels couldn’t take him to Heaven.

Greg Gutfeld reacted with uncharacteristic visceral disgust on today’s , “The Five”…

See also:

Twitchy: #AnswerTheQuestionJim: Will gun-grabbing hypocrite Jim Carrey denounce ‘Kick Ass 2′?; He bravely runs away

Twitchy: Roseanne Barr not buying Jim Carrey’s ‘humble egoist shtick’

Video: Jeanine Pirro and Chairman of House Judiciary Committee, Bob Goodlatte Discuss ICE Chief’s Testimony

Jeanine Pirro also had on Va Congressman Bob Goodlatte, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, on her Fox Show,  Justice With Judge Jeanine to discuss his hearings last week on ICE’s decision to release criminal immigrant detainees.

Video via Massteaparty.

Linked by Doug Ross, thanks!

Video: Jeanine Pirro on Benghazi: “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied”

In this week’s Justice with Judge Jeanine, the Judge kept the focus on Benghazi  – “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied”….

Key question: What could possibly be the reason for the failure to not only prosecute those responsible or even take them into custody – let alone interrogate them? Pirro  asked. “And make no mistake – we know who they are. They were on camera. There was a drone and a video. They actually took credit for the attack. Witnesses and authorities have identified  Ahmed Abu Khattala as the ringleader of the the September 11 attack in Benghazi. Yet  Khattala doesn’t even bother to hide his defiance and hatred of the United States. He walks around openly in Benghazi in his sandals drinking cocktails. The leader of Ansar Al Sharia, he has has praised those whose trucks and fighters were seen attacking our mission. So why haven’t we even spoken to this guy?”

***

“And what about those Benghazi survivors? Pirro queried. “Why haven’t the President or Hillary visited any of them?  Could it be that those survivors might have a different narrative. And then say, ‘I told them what really happened.’ It’s called deniability, folks.”

To discuss the search for answers on Benghazi,  Judge Pirro had on former CIA operative Mike Baker, and Fox News military analyst, Col. Mike Hunt:

Videos via Massteaparty.