John McCain/Mitt Romney

The ticket???

I could live with it:

In a show of Republican unity, one-time bitter foes John McCain and Mitt Romney raised money and campaigned together Thursday for a single goal – getting McCain elected president.

“We are united. Now our job is to energize our party,” the Arizona senator said in an airport hangar, flanked by Romney and Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., an early McCain supporter. Both have been mentioned as potential vice presidential picks, and McCain praised each.

Romney lauded McCain and promised to do all he can to help, saying: “He is a man who is proven and tested” and without question the right man to be president.

All of a sudden they’re best buds…it’s a sure sign, I’m thinking.


Allahpundit’s boss says to show some solidarity with the Dutch by embedding this video. So I’m happy to oblige. I’ve only had time to watch about five minutes of it so far, but it looks to be good.

Here is Geert Wilders’ own website.

Thanks to The Jawa Report for the link.


Okay, now that I’ve had a chance to see it, I have to say…I saw nothing even remotely objectionable in this film. It merely speaks the truth. Jihadis don’t seem to be able to handle the truth. Too bad.


Oops, how awkward…it seems Wilders has made a bit of a gaffe in editing his film.


Here is the new version of Fitna, with the Westergaard Mohammad image replaced.

Here’s a good article from FrontPageMagazine on The Left and Fitna.

Coptic Priest Causes Islamic Clerics Heartburn…

When he’s not converting them to Christianity:

Meet Father Zakaria Botros, Islam’s public enemy #1:

Though he is little known in the West, Coptic priest Zakaria Botros — named Islam’s “Public Enemy #1” by the Arabic newspaper, al-Insan al-Jadid — has been making waves in the Islamic world. Along with fellow missionaries — mostly Muslim converts — he appears frequently on the Arabic channel al-Hayat (i.e., “Life TV”). There, he addresses controversial topics of theological significance — free from the censorship imposed by Islamic authorities or self-imposed through fear of the zealous mobs who fulminated against the infamous cartoons of Mohammed. Botros’s excurses on little-known but embarrassing aspects of Islamic law and tradition have become a thorn in the side of Islamic leaders throughout the Middle East.

Botros is an unusual figure onscreen: robed, with a huge cross around his neck, he sits with both the Koran and the Bible in easy reach. Egypt’s Copts — members of one of the oldest Christian communities in the Middle East — have in many respects come to personify the demeaning Islamic institution of “dhimmitude” (which demands submissiveness from non-Muslims, in accordance with Koran 9:29). But the fiery Botros does not submit, and minces no words. He has famously made of Islam “ten demands,” whose radical nature he uses to highlight Islam’s own radical demands on non-Muslims.

The result? Mass conversions to Christianity — if clandestine ones. The very public conversion of high-profile Italian journalist Magdi Allam — who was baptized by Pope Benedict in Rome on Saturday — is only the tip of the iceberg. Indeed, Islamic cleric Ahmad al-Qatani stated on al-Jazeera TV a while back that some six million Muslims convert to Christianity annually, many of them persuaded by Botros’s public ministry.

His M.O.? He broadcasts in Arabic, (enabling him to reach a broad audience through the new media). Muslims can ask questions about Islam without fear of reprisal, unprecedented in the Islamic world. And he uses a technique that has proven irrefutable:

Each of his episodes has a theme — from the pressing to the esoteric — often expressed as a question (e.g., “Is jihad an obligation for all Muslims?”; “Are women inferior to men in Islam?”; “Did Mohammed say that adulterous female monkeys should be stoned?” “Is drinking the urine of prophets salutary according to sharia?”). To answer the question, Botros meticulously quotes — always careful to give sources and reference numbers — from authoritative Islamic texts on the subject, starting from the Koran; then from the canonical sayings of the prophet — the Hadith; and finally from the words of prominent Muslim theologians past and present — the illustrious ulema.

Botros treats the question as open, and invites the ulema, (the revered articulators of sharia law) to respond.

More often than not, the response from the ulema is deafening silence — which has only made Botros and Life TV more enticing to Muslim viewers. The ulema who have publicly addressed Botros’s conclusions often find themselves forced to agree with him — which has led to some amusing (and embarrassing) moments on live Arabic TV.

Read the entire article for examples of some of these moments.

Incapable of rebutting Botros, the only strategy left to the ulema (aside from a rumored $5-million bounty on his head) is to ignore him. When his name is brought up, they dismiss him as a troublemaking liar who is backed by — who else? — international “Jewry.” They could easily refute his points, they insist, but will not deign to do so. That strategy may satisfy some Muslims, but others are demanding straightforward responses from the ulema.

Here’s a video I found on Youtube, no doubt made by some frustrated Jihadi jerkweed:

Just pitiful…….as DPUD would say… FAIL!

Kudos to this mighty Christian warrior. God speed Father Botros.

Hat tip: The Jawa Report