This story is not going away. The smoking gun has been found in the code. Besides being unethical d-bags in their emails, the scientists at CRU were clearly manipulating their data.
Click here to see the statement the Media Research Center’s Brent Bozell issued on this.
This is the greatest scandal in the history of modern science, and the left-wing media continue to ignore it!
If the media’s dishonesty hasn’t already been proven by past lies, distortions and omissions, the ClimateGate cover-up leaves no question.
Click here and take fast action with me. Join with thousands of MRC Action team members by emailing and calling ABC, NBC and CBS executives, demanding full and complete coverage of the ClimateGate scandal!
Nice Deb 
Pingback: Tweets that mention Day 13 Of Climategate Scandal; ABC, CBS, NBC Still AWOL « Nice Deb -- Topsy.com
Every American should be angry and a bit frightened concerning our supposed “free and open media”. This pattern of not reporting anything that is “negative” toward the Liberals is getting worse daily. To what degree will they go to hide something really awful? Could the media put all of us in extreme danger for failing to report something we should know? When the media reports something bad about a conservative, I like it. I want to know when my government officials are screwing up, Dem or Repub. This current pattern is very dangerous, and I hope to God the citizens in this country wake the hell up.
LikeLike
Why does the MSM do sex to us?
LikeLike
Their silence is obvious, had this mess been created by conservatives, and had it reflected poorly on Bush and his Administration, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, it woul be their lead story every 15 minutes, it would be on every blog, it would be texted to every available cell phone. But since it severely impacts obama and his regime, they will remain silent. ANY story that negatively impacts the very person they feel is going to bail them out financially, will not be reported. These people have given up on their integrity as news agencies and their status as such should be removed. When they fail in their duties to report the news, the cease being the “Press”. They cannot even see that the reason they are failing, is because of their own ideology. They backed the socialist and his regime, now they cannot back off, for fear of not getting bailed out. The ONLY one who did not suckle off that breast, was FOX news, and they don’t need a bail out….. I wonder why??? Because people trust FOX news to bring them ALL the news, and not be spoon fed just the stories abc, nbc, and cbs want them to see. Their so called reporting of the news is likened only to the dribble hitler allowed to be spewed. They are one in the same. I cannot wait until they all fail and there is no more money in the coffers, to bail them out. But knowing how obama is, they will make FOX News pay to bail them out, you know make them “spread their wealth”. I also see Al Gore conveniently got out of his Copenhagen Speech, LMFAO. Yeah right, a scheduling issue, right like anyone will believe that one.
LikeLike
Global Warming and climate change are very confusing to the untrained. I know this to be true because I heard it on the news. I don’t pretend to know what this graph shows as I am much too young. http://pruneishbehavior.blogspot.com/2009/11/predicting-global-warming.html
LikeLike
American Power tracked-back with, ‘Global Warming Fraud an Attack on Humanity’.
LikeLike
Pingback: Saudia Arabia drops ClimateGate Bomb on Copenhagen « VotingFemale Speaks!
Pingback: EPA to Attack US Economy by declaring CO2 toxic; without CO2, all plant life would die « VotingFemale Speaks!
Pingback: Saudi Arabia Not Amused by ClimateGate: Confidence Shaken in Global Warming Claims, Saudi Leaders Call for Investigation « Frugal Café Blog Zone
Pingback: Day 1 Tribute to Copenhagen’s ‘Taxation to Oblivion” Summit: “Green Fakers” & Other Global Warming Spoofs « Frugal Café Blog Zone
“Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming.
It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions.
A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable.
Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much.
But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity.
The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems.
All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year.
It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate.
Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet–with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless.
Harleigh Kyson Jr.
LikeLike