It’s Jay Sekulow v.s. John Flannery on what is the law, now – is the whole thing “kaput”, as Megyn Kelly puts it?
Flannery repeatedly brings politics into the discussion, even after being asked not to:
Some legal eagles are saying:
…we have a White House that has declared its intent to ignore a declaratory judgment.
The Administration has no right to do this.
Obama’s White House has exactly two options:
- Comply with the ruling. This means that any and all activity authorized or mandated by the Statute (must) cease now.
- File an appeal and ask for a stay pending its hearing. If said stay is granted, then the ruling is held pending consideration.
The statement from The Obama Administration is a declaration that he is not a President, but rather a King and he arrogates to himself a “divine right.” The willful and intentional refusal of an organ of government to abide a lawful decision of a court of competent jurisdiction is a declaration of tyranny and lawlessness. Such a declaration has only one lawful response, and that is the preparation and filing of Articles of Impeachment on an immediate basis.
Why hasn’t the Obama administration asked for a stay?
MORE Obama Tyranny in the news:
Obama: I Will Veto Any Bill Which Limits the EPA’s Nonexistent Power to Regulate Greenhouse Gases
Me: I Think I Just Found A New Amdment For the Debt-Ceiling Bill