All Republican Camps Deny Pushing Cain Allegations, Meanwhile Cain Raking In Record Amounts of Campaign $$$

The Hill asked all of the Republican primary contenders if they had anything to do with the Cain sexual harassment story and they all flatly denied it:

Every time one of the other campaigns gets a bad story they try to blame us,” said Perry spokesperson Mark Miner. “It’s way off-base. It’s completely inaccurate.”
Mitt Romney’s campaign issued a similar response. “We had absolutely nothing to do with it,” said Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul.

My money’s been on Mittens, but that’s just me. I could be wrong. I’m just basing it on hearsay.

The story received blanket coverage from news organizations Monday, threatening serious damage to Cain’s ascendant campaign.

Other GOP campaigns also vehemently denied being behind the story.

“We plan to go after Mr. Cain, and Romney and Perry for that matter, over issues like their support of bailouts and TARP,” said Ron Paul spokesman Jesse Benton. “Our campaign stays away from the personal attacks and mud slinging.”

Hogan Gidley, a spokesman for Rick Santorum, said they “had absolutely nothing to do with it.”

The campaign of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) also denied any involvement. “It absolutely did not come from us,” Bachmann spokeswoman Alice Stewart said.

Spokespeople for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman (R) also said their campaigns had no involvement in pushing the story.

Huntsman?! Yeah, right –  because when Cain’s supporters are freed up they’ll be stampeding straight to John Huntsman, baby!

Newt certainly has an interest, here, because that’s who a lot of Cain supporters will end up supporting if Cain implodes.

But so far, that remains to be seen.

In fact if anything, the story is helping with fundraising:

“Yesterday, with the firestorm, was one of our best fund-raising days online since the campaign started,” Cain told Laura Ingraham during the conservative host’s radio show this morning.

His campaign said he raised $300,000 online since Politico broke a story Sunday alleging that two women accused Cain of sexual harassment in the 1990s when he was head of the National Restaurant Association. They both allegedly received settlements.

One Cain campaign consultant said yesterday was the “single biggest fundraising Monday in the campaign’s history.” He added that the outpouring of support shows, “the article upset a lot of his supporters, and his supporters are ardent.”

Have I linked to Stacy McCain’s piece in The American Spectator, today, yet?

If not, here it is: ‘Sources Say’ is definitely worth a read.

Indeed, it is politics, where long-ago complaints by former employees can be dredged up and turned into a scandal reported hourly by the cable news networks. And it is politics, where few reporters took notice when Karol Markowicz, who worked closely with Cain on his 2004 Senate campaign in Georgia, strongly defended him in a series of Twitter messages Sunday evening. “I don’t believe…that Cain behaved inappropriately.… He never even bordered on inappropriate in the slightest,” she wrote, adding that she “just can’t believe there’s anything to the charges.” Markowicz called into Mark Levin’s nationally syndicated radio show Monday evening to reiterate her defense of Cain, but other than by me and the Weekly Standard‘s Michael Warren, this obviously relevant testimonial was ignored by the press. Meanwhile, on MSNBC — which showed no interest at all in Markowicz or anyone else vouching for Cain’s good character — Chris Matthews offered one of the Politico reporters “congratulations on breaking this story.”

Hat tip: Charles B.


8 thoughts on “All Republican Camps Deny Pushing Cain Allegations, Meanwhile Cain Raking In Record Amounts of Campaign $$$

  1. Yes, I would go with Karl ‘marx’ Rove also, that guy is a total GOP hack who would love Mitt for brains to get the nod. He also has safe distance from Mittens as well, so could easily be a fall guy with no recourse if the poop hit the fan. Don’t trust Rove as far as I woudl like to kick him actually, always makes me turn Hannity off on XM when he is the frequent guest on there.


  2. THis is why we do not pick unknown candidates like Cain, he has shown himself to handle this bad. How many times can he lie about knowing of this scandle in one day, I am sorry to tell you this, but Cain may have had a good day with money, according to him, but he is not going to be the nominee, the establishment will slam with with this and all the other stuff. Its either Romney or Perry, which Perry has the record, the plan, and he has already beaten the Rove machine once in Texas, and his team has beat the establishment a few times already.


  3. “THis is why we do not pick unknown candidates like Cain….” and the well known, well vetted McCain pick worked out SO WELL for us last time, didn’t it?


  4. Pingback: I Am The .001% - The POH Diaries

  5. Rove wouldn’t be the one to talk to Politico, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if one of his brain-dead minions was told to.

    “Everyone knows” is a poor way to justify anything, but everyone knows Rove has to have a pipeline into the FBI, and if there is any file on Cain at all, this should be at the top of that file. Add to that the fact that Obummer has absolutely no desire to tangle with a real black, and you can imagine that Duh-1’s top law-breaker, Holder, would gladly supply Rove with the necessary info.

    Mind you, I’m not accusing Rove of it, just saying he could very easily be behind the plot, like any good Democrap-lite would like to be.


  6. Pingback: FMJRA 2.0: Cowboy : The Other McCain

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s