Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video)

Could Obama really be on the verge of making our worst conspiracy theory nightmares about a “new world order” come true, under the radar, while most people are focused on the primaries?

Dick Morris is sounding the alarm about four uttely heinous UN treaties that are currently under consideration by the Obama administration that would surrender our sovereignty, cede power to go to war to the UN,  enact gun control, and tell us how to raise our children, if ratified by the Senate. These are treaties that the Bush administration and even Clinton administration would never have considered, but as the most radical  administration in American history enters it’s last year, all stars are in alignment for it to happen.

Here is some additional information about the treaties under consideration:

The International Criminal Court:

In a series of articles (see here, here, and here, The New American revealed the campaign for the ICC as a colossal bait and switch scam. While proponents were selling the ICC as the institution that would haul the Hitlers and Stalins of the world before the bar of justice, what they were actually building is a global judicial monster that violates all the major principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and accountability.

In spite of their incessant prattling about dedication to  “transparency,” the globalists have been obdurately opaque about key features of the ICC, such as:

No right to a trial by a jury of one’s peers;
No right to habeas corpus;
No right to bail;
No right to a speedy trial;
No protection against indefinite pre-trial detention;
No protection against being transported to foreign lands

America’s top constitutional champions have rightly denounced the ICC. As we reported in 1998:

Dr. Charles Rice, professor of law at Notre Dame University, has termed the ICC “a monster,” both in concept and reality, noting that it effectively “repudiates the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence and cancels the 4th of July.” “In our system,” Professor Rice explains, “law is supposed to be a rule of reason which, in a sense, controls the state and compels the state to operate under the law.” But the superjurisdictional ICC, he points out, has no legitimate basis for its claimed authority, no protections against abuses, no accountability, and virtually no limits to its jurisdiction. “What are the limits on the ICC?” he asks, and then answers, “There are none. It’s insane!”

As news of this ICC criminal insanity became more widely known, the U.S. Congress was deluged with letters, e-mails, faxes, phone calls, and petitions opposing it. It was obvious that the Senate would not ratify the Rome Statute. The Clinton administration, which, only months previously had been so confident of ratification, did not even send the treaty to the Senate.

The Law of the Sea Treaty:

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

  • Law of the Sea: UNCLOS—sometimes called the “Law of the Sea Treaty” (or LOST)—established a comprehensive legal regime for navigation and international management of oceanic resources, including the deep seabed.
  • President Reagan Refused to Sign: President Ronald Reagan announced that he would not sign UNCLOS shortly after it was adopted in 1982. Reagan stated several objections to it, most of which dealt with its provisions on deep seabed mining. Reagan did, however, support the navigational provisions of UNCLOS, which reflected the customary international law of the sea.

The U.S. Has Much to Lose …

  • Another Unaccountable International Bureaucracy: UNCLOS establishes the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a new U.N.-style bureaucracy located in Kingston, Jamaica. As only one of more than 160 countries in the ISA, the U.S. would have limited authority over its decisions regarding the deep seabed. Just like the U.N. General Assembly, proceedings at the ISA would be dominated by anti-U.S. interests.
  • Redistribution of U.S. Wealth to the “Developing World”: The U.S. currently enjoys full sovereignty over its entire continental shelf. It can claim all its mineral resources (e.g., oil and gas) and can collect royalty revenue from oil and gas companies for exploitation. If the U.S. joined UNCLOS, Article 82 would require the U.S. to transfer a significant portion of any such royalties to the ISA for “redistribution” to the so-called developing world, including corrupt and despotic regimes.
  • Mandatory Dispute Resolution: Under Part XV, the U.S. would be required to engage in mandatory dispute resolution for any claim brought against it by another member of UNCLOS. This may open the U.S. to any number of specious allegations brought by opportunistic nations, including allegations of environmental degradation or polluting the ocean environment with carbon emissions or even from land-based sources.
  • U.S. Economic Interests at Risk: UNCLOS claims the deep seabed resources of the oceans as “the common heritage of mankind” and forbids mining unless permission is first received by the ISA, which, of course, takes into account the interests of “developing states” regarding the exploitation of those resources. UNCLOS encourages technology transfers from advanced mining companies to support the mining activities by developing states, which is likely to discourage U.S. companies from participating in such activities.
  • The Convention Was Not “Fixed” in 1994: During the early 1990s the deep seabed mining provisions of UNCLOS were renegotiated in the “1994 Agreement.” This addendum to the convention was signed by the Clinton Administration in July 1994. While the 1994 Agreement improved many provisions of the convention, it did not secure “veto” power for the U.S. over the decisions of the ISA.

Small Arms Treaty:

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

  1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.
  2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).
  3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).
  4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.
  5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC):

The UNCRC is an international treaty focused on promoting the rights of children and seeking to give children priority in the implementation of governmental measures. The Convention claims to offer a road map that will guide government officials in the improvement of laws and policies, by defining which rights the government should give to children.

A VEILED THREAT

Since its introduction in 1989, the Convention has been ratified by every nation in the world except for the United States and Somalia. The CRC was signed by President Clinton in 1995, but early opposition in the Senate persuaded Clinton not to submit the treaty to the Senate for ratification.

The Senators who opposed the CRC in 1995 believed that the Convention marked a significant departure from the American concept of the relationship between state and child, and was incompatible with the right of parents to raise their children.

These concerns stem from the CRC’s repeated emphasis on two principles that should guide all decisions affecting children: consideration of the “best interests of the child” and the child’s “evolving capacities.” These two principles are the “umbrella principles underlining the exercise of all the rights in the Convention.”

The following sections explain why these two principles will, if implemented, jeopardize the vital role of parents within the American family.

WHAT IS REALLY “BEST FOR THE CHILD”?

The “Best Interests of the Child”

Article 3 of the CRC states that “in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.” Thus, policies affecting children at all levels of society and government should have the child’s best interest as the primary concern.

The problem for families occurs when this principle surfaces as a guiding principle for parents. Article 18(1) of the CRC states that “Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern.”

A DEPARTURE FROM AMERICAN LAW

But the Convention’s emphasis on the “best interests” principle is a sharp break from American law. In the 1993 case of Reno v. Flores, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “the ‘best interests of the child’ is not the legal standard that governs parents’ or guardians’ exercise of their custody.”

In the 2000 case of Troxel v. Granville, the Court struck down a grandparent visitation statute because decisions about the child were made “solely on the judge’s determination of the child’s best interests,” without regard to the wishes of the parent.

The Court’s decisions in Reno and Troxel reflect a fundamental tenet of American family law, which recognizes that parents typically act in the best interests of their children. Indeed, “United States case law is replete with examples of parents fighting for the best interests of their children,” ranging from a child’s right to an education to the right of personal injury compensation.

Thus, except in cases where a parent has been proven to be “unfit,” American law presumes that the parent is acting in the best interests of the child, and defers to that parent’s decision.

The Convention, in contrast, supplants this traditional presumption in favor of parents with a new presumption in favor of the state.

People need to start raising a ruckus over this or as Dick Morris noted, the United States may not be able to survive another ten months of this regime.

SEE ALSO:

Quin Hillyer: His Abominations Accelerate

Linked by Doug Ross in Larwyn’s Links

About these ads

28 Responses to “Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video)”

  1. John Says:

    Deb, just wanted to say thanks for the blog. Always good, relevant material.

  2. DGA Says:

    Although there is some nasty, despot dictator type issues in this, the one that got to me…”2.Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).”
    Bring it on you commie bastards.

  3. Carlos Says:

    Body Odor is not some run-of-the-mill commie bastard as indicated by DGA, he is a megalomaniac (a la Pol Pot or Uncle Joe), a narcissist (a la Napoleon), and a NAZI (a la Adolph Hitler, except his target will be Christians instead of Jews, and conservatives because they are enemies of the state).

    His entire raison d’etre is to become such a dictator that not even his closest staff, not even his wife, will dare challenge him because, doggone it, he’s the smartest man in the world and besides, he won and no one else did.

  4. SB Smith Says:

    I’d like to leave a comment, but you wouldn’t be able to show it here.
    What I can say is that this is heinous – off the scale, and beyond description.

  5. Saturday Breakfast Links | Points and Figures Says:

    [...] am not a big fan of the UN. Why are we in it [...]

  6. Nice Deb Talks About Obama’s Four Treaties That Would Destroy The United States | Extrano's Alley, a gun blog Says:

    [...] Nicedeb talks about four treaties the Obama regime is poised to hand to the Senate. Each of these, including the “Small Arms Treaty,” the “International Criminal Court Treaty,” the “Law of The Sea Treaty,” and the “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,” will adversely affect all of us. You can read all about it, here. [...]

  7. Weldon Wray Woodward Says:

    surely president obama would never endorse this. without the bill of rights we would be sitting naked and defenseless.

  8. Weldon Wray Woodward Says:

    remember to vote 11.6.2012

  9. ‘Obama is Betraying America!’ Dick Morris on 4 UN Treaties « ~ BLOGGER.GUNNY.G.1984+. ~ (BLOG & EMAIL) Says:

    [...] Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video) (nicedeb.wordpress.com) [...]

  10. Anonymous Says:

    Weldon Wray Woodward, have you been laboring under the false impression that the usurper has your best interests at heart??

  11. Agent007 Says:

    I will die first !!!!! you come on my property….for any NWO…reason….you will pay a heavy price !!!!!!

  12. sovereigntea Says:

    The Club of Rome seems inextricably linked with the environmental movement in all its pseudo religious fervour.

    Mikhail Gorbachev – CoR executive member, former President of the Soviet Union, founder of Green Cross International and the Gorbachev Foundation, Nobel Peace Prize winner, co-founder (with Hidalgo) of the Club of Madrid, co-author (with Strong) of the Earth Charter.

    “The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable,indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation.”
    - UN Commission on Global Governance report

    Rockefeller said in 1994 at a U.N. dinner:”We are on the verge of a global transformation.All we need is the right major crisis…”
    David Rockefeller, Club of Rome executive member

    From some current members of the Club of Rome or its two siblings:
    http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
    excerpts
    Twenty years after the Limits to Growth the CoR published another major report that became an instant best-seller. In The First Global Revolution the Club of Rome claimed that the time to act had run out. It was now or never. Delay in beginning corrective measures will increase the damage to the world ecological system and ultimately reduce the human population that will eventually be supportable. They also stated that democratic governments are far too short-sighted to deal with the ‘problematique’ and new forms of governance are urgently required.

    From their publications

    The common enemy of humanity is man.

    In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.

    The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real leadership and innovation

    Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”

    So, long before Global Warming became a well known issue Al Gore and his Club of Rome colleagues stated that they would use the threat of global warming to unite humanity and “set the scene for mankind’s encounter with the planet.” In the same way that shamans and sooth-sayers in medieval times used their advance knowledge of when eclipses would occur to control and terrify their followers, they would use a natural phenomenon as their ‘enemy’ to achieve their objectives. But then they state that although Global Warming would be presented as the initial enemy, the real enemy of humanity would be portrayed as man himself. I am already noticing how frequently the terms climate change and overpopulation are being uttered in the same breath.
    exc’
    The CoR claims that “we are facing an imminent catastrophic ecological collapse” and “our only hope is to transform humanity into a global interdependent sustainable society, based on respect and reverence for the Earth.” In the end I came to the conclusion that there are two possibilities – either the CoR wrote all these reports and setup a vast network of supporting organisations just for fun or they actually believe what they have written and are working hard to fulfill their role as the self-appointed saviours of Gaia.

    “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence
    more than 500 million but less than one billion.”
    - Club of Rome,Goals for Mankind

    Al Gore – former VP of the USA, leading climate change campaigner, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Academy Award winner, Emmy winner. Gore lead the US delegations to the Rio Earth Summit and Kyoto Climate Change conference. He chaired a meeting of the full Club of Rome held in Washington DC in 1997.

    Javier Solana – Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, High Representative for EU Foreign Policy.

    Maurice Strong – former Head of the UN Environment Programme, Chief Policy Advisor to Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit, co-author (with Gorbachev) of the Earth Charter, co-author of the Kyoto Protocol, founder of the Earth Council, devout Baha’i.

    Diego Hidalgo – CoR executive member, co-founder (with Gorbachev) of the Club of Madrid, founder and President of the European Council on Foreign Relations in association with George Soros.

    Ervin Laszlo – founding member of the CoR, founder and President of the Club of Budapest, founder and Chairman of the World Wisdom Council.

    Anne Ehrlich – Population Biologist. Married to Paul Ehrlich with whom she has authored many books on human overpopulation. Also a former director of Friends of the Earth and the Sierra Club, and a member of the UN’s Global Roll of Honor.

    “Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” – Prof Paul R. Ehrlich, Stanford University

    Bill Gates – founder of Microsoft, philanthropist

    David Rockefeller – CoR executive member, former Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, founder of the Trilateral Commission, executive member of the World Economic Forum, donated land on which the United Nations stands.

    Stephen Schneider – Stanford Professor of Biology and Global Change. Professor Schneider was among the earliest and most vocal proponents of man-made global warming and a lead author of many IPCC reports.

    Bill Clinton – former President of the United States, founder of the Clinton Global Iniative.

    The US Council on Foreign Relations. Global Governance

    The IGG is the largest single initiative and one of the largest in the councils history.”

    Apparently “its unusual that this event is on the record” secrecy being the norm. ”

    This session is part of a Council on Foreign Relations symposium on Rising Powers and Global Institutions in the Twenty-First Century and was made possible through generous support from the Robina Foundation.

    The Robina Foundation has awarded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) a five-year, $10.3 million grant to expand its activities on international cooperation. This award is one of the largest operating grants in CFR’s history and will support its International Institutions and Global Governance (IIGG) Program.

    The IIGG Program was founded in 2008 with a generous grant from Robina.

    Global Economic Governance: Progress and Prospects in the G20, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank (Video)

    http://www.cfr.org/world-bank/global-economic-governance-progress-prospects-g20-international-monetary-fund-world-bank-video/p22174

    The CFR “Global Governance Monitor where one can check up on “progress” on the path to global tyranny the International Institutions and Global Governance program.

    http://www.cfr.org/global-governance/global-governance-monitor/p18985?co=C028801

  13. Obama’s Sneaky Treaties | Try 2 Focus Says:

    [...] Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video) (nicedeb.wordpress.com) [...]

  14. The 4 America-Betraying Treaties Obama is Poised to Sign Says:

    [...] Treaties Obama is Poised to Sign February 14, 2012, 11:24 am By Guest Author Leave a Comment Nice Deb Republished with thanks, by permission, from February, 3, [...]

  15. Rachael Kavanagh Says:

    You are an excellent find. Thankyou.

  16. The First Time The Ayers Family’s Mailman Heard of Barack « Nice Deb Says:

    [...] Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video): Could Obama really be on the verge of making our worst conspiracy theory nightmares about a “new world order” come true, under the radar, while most people are focused on the primaries? [...]

  17. Obama quietly seeking to cede U.S. oceans to U.N. law « Gds44's Blog Says:

    [...] Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video) (nicedeb.wordpress.com) Share this:TwitterFacebookPrintEmailMoreStumbleUponRedditDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

  18. Frank Says:

    This is what the liberal socialist have wanted since the creation of the “socialist party of america” and much to the dismay of democrats their party has been very close with this radical party since that party cheered for the work hitler was doing and the new york times cheered his socialist conquest much like liberals are cheering for france and greece voting socialist.

    What most democrats don’t understand is their entire way of life and all their hopes and dreams will be crushed by this liberal socialist regime but maybe that is what it will take to finally get it through their thick heads.

    I have an aunt that is a liberal socialist and the more you prove to her or show her what is in store under this radical dictator obama the more she digs her heels in and defends him never citing facts or making much sense and her husband (my uncle) and her are quite comfortable financially BUT her grandkids and her very own kids are losers (my cousins) so she wants government to help them out so I understand why she is willing to go this route even though you shouldn’t throw the child out with the bathwater.

    I come from a military family and served 6 years myself and have seen socialist countries first hand it’s ugly for all but a few lucky ones at the top but once done it’s extremely hard to go back especially without weapons just look at the liberal socialist countries like france, greece, spain, mexico, middle east, venezuela, ireland, portugal and on and on all living in fear and without freedom or any way to defend themselves.

    I guess some people would rather be taken care of and lose their freedoms than be poor or have to struggle that is the shame of liberal socialism it makes slaves out of all who vote for it like the black community that democrats have kept dependent so they have a dedicated voting base that cannot bite the hand that feeds them and the liberal socialists are working on latinos right now trying to do the very same thing but my question is how can latinos run from their socialist government then want to vote for the same type of government once here?

  19. Dick Morris: Obama Set To Sign UN Gun Control Treaty, July 27 (Video) « Nice Deb Says:

    [...] bells about the Obama regime’s plans to betray America by ceding US sovereignty to the UN through 4 UN treaties  currently under consideration by the US government; The International Criminal Court, The Law of [...]

  20. Dick Morris: Obama Set To Sign UN Gun Control Treaty, July 27 (Video) | FavStocks Says:

    [...] bells about the Obama regime’s plans to betray America by ceding US sovereignty to the UN through 4 UN treaties  currently under consideration by the US government; The International Criminal Court, The Law of [...]

  21. (Video) Dick Morris: July 27 Obama Is Poised To Hand The United Nations The Key To Your Gun Cabinet - Waznmentobe Says:

    [...] alarm bells about the Obama regime’s plans to betray America by ceding US sovereignty to the UN through 4 UN treaties  currently under consideration by the US government; The International Criminal Court, The Law of [...]

  22. Nice Deb’s Top Ten Posts of 2012 « Nice Deb Says:

    [...] Obama Poised to Betray America Through 4 UN Treaties (Video) February, 3, [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,465,590 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 462 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: