Karl Rove on Hilary Rosen: Guys in (Obama’s) Chicago Headquarters Are Saying – “Isn’t it great we got our shot in and we were able to distance ourselves from it?”

Via Fox Nation, a very interesting clip from Greta Van Susteren’s show, last night. Greta did her best to defend Hilary Rosen, who she admitted was a friend, but an uncharacteristically animated Rove was having none of it. He quickly cut to the chase:
ROVE: It was negative, nasty, mean and unnecessary! And — and this — this so-called apology, with all due respect to Ms. Rosen, was a half apology. I mean, she was the one, I repeat, who started what she called a phony war on stay-at-home moms. And — and her — it was not contrite. That was — that was just — look, I think – I think there are people in Chicago who – - who are happy that Hilary Rosen has said this thing and has injected this into the campaign…
VAN SUSTEREN: They’ve thrown her under the bus already.
ROVE: … and they’re…
VAN SUSTEREN: Oh, they’ve quickly thrown her under the bus.
ROVE: Yes, well, they — yes, in a 140-word Twitter — tweet. You know, nobody has — nobody has called her up…
VAN SUSTEREN: Well, they threw her under the bus…
ROVE: … Debbie Wasserman Schultz…
VAN SUSTEREN: … a lot faster — they’ve thrown her under the bus a lot faster than they did, for instance, Reverend Wright. I mean…
(CROSSTALK)
ROVE: Yes, I repeat — I repeat, with a tweet. They should have called up Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic national chairman, whom they instructed to put Rosen in as a senior adviser and say, Publicly fire her as a senior adviser! But they don’t do that. Why? Because one of the persons who has — who has coined the phrase “war on women” and used it probably more than anybody — and other public figure is Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairman of the Democratic Party!
VAN SUSTEREN: Look, I…
Rove again, repeated what so many of us on the right have been saying. This was a calculated, Obama approved hit-job.
ROVE: The Chicago crowd is happy to have this out there!
VAN SUSTEREN: Karl, I’m totally in agreement with you on this “war on women” thing. I’m totally — I mean, that’s — that is phony. You know, I totally agree with that, you know, 100 percent.
I think that the way Hilary Rosen handled this last night, the point that she was trying to get, whether you agree with her or not, was — it was handled very poorly. It was clumsy. I’m only telling you that she’s not anti-stay-at-home mothers. I can tell you that. You know, from the — I know that…

Greta is a faithful friend, I’ll grant her that. But she failed miserably in her attempt to defend the indefensible.

VAN SUSTEREN: … more of a reference to Governor Romney than it was to Mrs. Romney because I think the whole point that she was trying to say that, who he was looking for as economic advice. I actually thought the shot was more at him.
ROVE: No. There are three — she takes three sentences and devotes three separate shots at Ann Romney. And look, Greta, we’re going to disagree about this. I understand that. I think people ought to just go to YouTube, Hilary Rosen, CNN appearance, and judge for themselves.
It was personal! It was mean! It was nasty! And her apology is — is — is halfhearted! And I suspect there are guys in Chicago sitting in that headquarters who are saying, God, we were smart to get that 140-word tweet out, and isn’t it great we got our shot in and we were able to distance ourselves with it. And don’t bother picking up the phone and calling Debbie Wasserman Schultz and telling her to fire Rosen as an adviser. We can’t do that. But thank goodness we’ve handled it the way we did.
Watch the video, here.
Prediction. If Obama wins the 2012 election (*shudder*),  Hilary Rosen, (after being thrown under the bus with harsh condemnations on Twitter) will be awarded with  a sweet ambassadorship to some warm and exotic locale, a la Howard Gutman for securing the left-wing, feminist vote.
SEE ALSO:

No honest differences are possible with Mr. Obama. He will impugn the motives of any who disagree with him. As he told the AP, his opponents want to “let businesses pollute more and treat workers and consumers with impunity.” His agenda “isn’t a partisan feeling . . . [it]isn’t a Democratic or Republican idea. It’s patriotism.” To disagree with him is unpatriotic. That’s to be expected from Republicans, whom Mr. Obama says stand for “thinly veiled social Darwinism . . . [that is] antithetical to our entire history.”

Mr. Obama will build entire edifices on top of one fake premise, all dressed up in one big phony assumption. Take the House GOP budget plan. It increases federal outlays from roughly $3.6 trillion this year to nearly $4.9 trillion in 2022. In the AP speech the president called this a “cut” because he wants to increase spending to $5.8 trillion in 2022.

He warned that if the GOP’s “cuts . . . were to be spread out evenly across the budget,” then “Alzheimer’s and cancer and AIDS” research would be slashed, 10 million college students denied assistance, and “thousands” of researchers and teachers “could lose their jobs.” But Republicans don’t cut across the board. Instead, their focus is on waste, duplication, programs that do not work, and on reform.

Andrew Malcolm, IBD: Who is this guy pretending to be president?:

OK, Obama wants political skirmishes all over on any petty thing so people won’t notice the absence of any conceivably positive record to run on. Risky when Americans start paying attention. But if that’s his only card. It’s all the Republicans’ fault, of course. That’s the candidate in him, the one that prefers performing for adoring crowds instead of performing Oval Office duties.

But whatever happened to the president part? The leader. The principled man who through his personal story, skills and charm was going to inspire, convince, cajole Americans as diverse as himself to work together for a common national success? That official part has merged with the political, like the four Florida speeches. Now, he’s just trying to fool everybody about everything.

In a way, this could be good news for Republicans. The duplicate Ernst Blofeld makes Mitt Romney look like Mr. Rogers.

But without real presidential leadership, Obama’s hand-picked harpie atop the Democratic National Committee feels empowered to assign a hired gun to dismiss his opponent’s wife, the cancer-surviving mother of five sons, as someone who’s never worked a day in her life. Are they that scared already?

Seriously? We’re going to pit now one kind of working woman against another? The guy who talks about having so many women in his life isn’t going to fire the women responsible for that? He thinks American women will buy this stuff?

OK, Obama was raised by grandparents because he didn’t always have a stay-at-home mom or dad. But this is a nation, not a dysfunctional family or a windy city party where factions are left to their own wards and Solyndras.

Obama is the guy who said his own wife was off limits politically, the guy whose mother-in-law has resided since Day One in the White House at taxpayer expense as a live-in nanny so the first lady can campaign for money and healthy foods? But a woman who stays at home with her kids at no public expense can be trashed because of her party?

We were never exactly fond of the Original Obama. But we’d take him any day over the twilight character that inhabits the Oval Office now.

ZING.

Michelle Malkin: Real Moms of the GOP battle White House SOP:

This was no accidental rhetorical drive-by. “Progressives” from Gloria Steinem to Patricia Ireland to Naomi Wolf have derided their conservative counterparts as female impersonators, fake women and men with breasts from time immemorial. It’s SOP: standard operating procedure. In 1992, Hillary Clinton mocked women who stayed at home and “baked cookies and had teas.” In 2004, blueblood Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry, sniffed that first lady Laura Bush (a former teacher and librarian before becoming a homemaker) never “had a real job — I mean, since she’s been grown up.”

***

What’s changed in 2012 is the Internet revenge of thousands of conservative female activists who have played a larger role than ever in controlling political narratives. These include tea party leaders such as Breitbart.com editor Dana Loesch, national grassroots groups such as Smart Girl Politics, the proliferation of conservative female bloggers and podcasters, and the critical mass of stay-at-home moms, work-at-home moms and young conservative women flocking to Twitter.

As we’ve documented at my new Twitter curation/aggregation site, Twitchy.com, GOP moms, grandmothers and daughters have besieged White House social media efforts to paint conservatives as anti-women. They’ve torn apart hypocritical White House rhetoric about equal pay from an administration that has failed to practice what it preaches.

And as Ann Romney is now experiencing on Twitter, the women of the right are fighting their way through a hostile cesspool of misogyny that has been SOP for the feminist left.

Rosen and her media defenders dismissed “faux outrage” about her attack. But the real moms of the GOP have launched their own Occupy movement in the social media space once dominated by Obama’s army. And they’re winning.

Weasel Zippers: Rosen: Only Republicans Spread The “War on Women” Term, Obama Campaign “Does Not Use It”…

Hilarious. It’s been a preeminent  campaign theme for well over a month now…they’ve been fund-raising off of it. Anyone can check the Congressional record for the countless references to the “Republican War on women”. Weasel links to the DNC store  “War on Women” car magnets. The “communications expert” is a  nincompoop.

Taxes Stupidity and Death: You’ve Come A Long Way, Baby!

Remember when conservative women used to have to run for office to experience the scorn of the Left for being of the wrong political persuasion, and therefore ineligible for the defense and protection of the Party of Identity Politics?

Now, you don’t even have to be the candidate.  Being married to the candidate and having committed the crime of raising your five boys instead of paying someone else to do it is enough to bring to you the tolerance and inclusion that the left reserves especially for those who reject their social hegemony, and instead choose to live according to “outdated” and “archaic notions”.  They aren’t worthy of the same outrage reserved for other candidate’s wives who find themselves under scrutiny for things they have actually said.

Share

Don’t Let the Organized Left’s Charges of “McCarthyism” Deter You – Allen West Is Right

The U.S. Congress is swimming with far left Communist sympathizers. Naysayers can nitpick all day long about whether or not they are actually card carrying members of the Communist Party, or just fellow travelers. It’s a distinction without a difference that has serious political implications, and effects national security,  as Accuracy in Media’s Cliff Kincaid recently pointed out at Noisy Room:

Rep. Allen West’s comments about alleged communists in Congress have led to what West calls “A lot of buzz and inaccurate reporting” in the media. Some reporters have nitpicked West on whether he has concrete proof of actual card-carrying members of the Communist Party USA in the Congress.

Politico called him a McCarthyite and actually quoted a spokesman for the Communist Party as saying that West didn’t know what he was talking about.

But the alternative media, led by www.rebelpundit.com, have been covering the story of how the international communist movement, responsible for about one hundred million dead, is very much alive and has collaborators in the U.S. Congress. Rebel Pundit is the work of Jeremy Segal, a disciple of the late Andrew Breitbart who produced the recent video of Rep. Danny K. Davis being honored by the People’s World at the Communist Party U.S.A.’s headquarters in Chicago for a lifetime of “inspiring leadership.”

Davis serves on the Homeland Security Committee where his subcommittee assignments are the Subcommittee on Transportation and the Subcommittee on Oversight. He is also a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

When Segal started questioning the congressman outside the party headquarters, CPUSA members and a Davis handler wearing an Obama jacket tried to intervene to protect Davis from further questioning, with one person calling Segal “disgusting.” Segal protested, “Don’t touch me!”

But rather than highlight the case against Davis, who has represented the Chicago-area 7th Congressional District of Illinois since 1996, Chicago Tribune columnist and editorial writer Steve Chapman called West “an embarrassment to the party” for his anti-communist remarks and suggested that he be condemned or expelled from the GOP caucus in the House.

In a brief telephone interview, Chapman, who is labeled a “conservative” by the Townhall website, told AIM that he had never heard of or seen the Davis video, which was originally released through a Breitbart website on March 12. He said he would determine whether it is newsworthy if a link to the video was emailed to him. It has been done.

Just a little intellectual curiosity and honesty is asked of members of the media who are not themselves, fellow travelers. They shouldn’t be cowed by the Democrat media complex’s charges of “McCarthyism” and “red-baiting”.

The evidence of Communist collusion in Congress is all over the place:

Rep. West clearly understands the media war as well and said about the controversy over his comments: “The press wants to write gotcha stories and talk semantics, but just look at the words and actions of the [Congressional] Progressive Caucus. You can call them socialist, Marxist, communist or whatever you want, but the point is, they oppose free markets and individual economic freedom, they want to redistribute wealth, and they want to see the nation fundamentally transformed. Their policies are destructive and I will stand up to them regardless of the critics. Members of this Caucus lavished praise on Fidel Castro following a 2009 visit, just to name one example. The Communist Party USA claims the Progressive Caucus as its ‘ally.’”

West was referring to a 2009 visit to Cuba by Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Cal.), Bobby L. Rush (D-Ill.) and Emanuel Cleaver II (D-Mo.), who met Fidel Castro. Rush said about Raul Castro, “I think that what really surprised me, but also endeared me to him, was his keen sense of humor, his sense of history and his basic human qualities.”

Lee began her career in the California state legislature as a secret member of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a spin-off from the Communist Party.

Finish reading at Noisy Room for more and hit Rebelpundit’s tip jar so he can continue doing the good work he’s doing exposing the Communist left in Chicago.

SEE ALSO:

For a disturbing companion read, see Zombie, who attends a Berkeley lecture to learn: “Teaching as a Subversive Activity”: The Theory of Political Indoctrination:

Let it be noted that Professor H. Douglas Brown is no wild-eyed extremist; in fact, he’s rather bland and respectable and not the most thrilling of speakers, as you will soon hear. But that’s what made his presentation so disturbing: radical and self-admittedly “subversive” attitudes that affect the future of society are discussed with matter-of-fact nonchalance. The main drawback of Professor Brown’s verbal style (at least from my point of view) is that he often resorts to the academics’ tried-and-true escape hatch, which is to rephrase statements as questions, so as to have plausible deniability if later confronted. Thus, for example, instead of just flatly saying something like “We should indoctrinate students with leftist ideologies,” he asks “Should we indoctrinate students with leftist ideologies?” and only after five minutes of talking in circles eventually concludes “Yes.”

Linked by DaTechGuy, thanks!

Taxpayers Could be Liable For Rep. Cleaver’s $1.5 Mil Loan Default – Opponent Turk Calls For Ethics Investigation

Thursday,  KSHB Channel 41 Action News reported on the Bank of America lawsuit against Congressman Emanuel Cleaver for defaulting on a loan for a car wash he owns.

The lawsuit against the Democratic congressman seeks $1.5 million in principal, interest and late fees.

The loan was used to buy the business in 2002.

“Keep in mind, this was done before I went to Congress. I was a private citizen,” said Cleaver.

Oh, please - he then refused to pay back the loan while he was a Congressman.

Cleaver wouldn’t get into specifics of the lawsuit.

“I’m not trying tot hide the fact that I’m not going to litigate this in front of a TV camera,” he said.

Well, credit where it’s due – you have to admire a guy who is so open and honest about his lack of transparency.

It’s not clear as of yet who will be on the hook for the default – the bank or the taxpayers, but as KSHB noted, the congressman’s principal political opponent is already using the issue against him in this year’s campaign.

“Unless he will sprint to the bank and give them a check, we’re going to be on the hook for this. And I would ask him to go ahead and do that and clear this matter up and then it doesn’t have to go through the courts,” said Jacob Turk, a Republican who is running for Cleaver’s office for the fourth time.

He also wants an ethics investigation. Turk said Cleaver should have listed the loan on his financial disclosure form.

The suit filed by Bank of America on March 30 indicates that Cleaver has had trouble making payments throughout the life of the loan.

The Hill reported:

According to the bank’s filing, Cleaver’s loan was for $1.35 million, and he now owes $1.2 million in unpaid principal after 10 years.

But if $240,000 in unpaid interest and nearly $60,000 in late fees and other charges is added, Cleaver now owes more than $1.5 million, more than the original loan value.
“The Cleaver Company has defaulted on the Note by failing to make payments as required by the terms of the Note and by failing to make payments,” Bank of America wrote in its filing.Cleaver released a story last week in which he said, “This is a business dispute. The business has been run by an outside manager for years. Because this is a legal matter I am limited in what I can say and I hope you respect that.”
A court hearing  is scheduled for April 16.
Note: YouTube Video blocked by Scripps Local News Service. Watch at KSHB.

Share

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,465,590 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 462 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: