Dingy Harry’s Verbal Diarrhea Continues to Appall – Now He’s Calling Tea Partiers The Real Anarchists

How is it possible that the Majority Leader of the Senate in the United States of America sounds like such a blithering idiot? How in God’s name did this man get elected? How do the people of Nevada not notice his  glaringly obvious stupidity?

About a week ago, Dingy likened the Tea Party to Anarchists, saying “government is not inherently bad; government is inherently good”

We have a situation where this country has been driven by the Tea Party for the last number of years. When I was in school, I studied government and I learned about the anarchists. Now, they were different than the Tea Party because they were violent. But they were anarchists because they did not believe in government in any level and they acknowledged it. The Tea Party kind of hides that.

They don’t say they’re against government, but that is what it all amounts to. They’re not doing physically destructive things to buildings and people, directly, but they are doing everything they can to throw a monkey-wrench into every form of government, whether it’s local, state or federal. That’s what it’s all about. And so, anything they can do to through a monkey-wrench in the wheels of government, they’re happy doing that. And I’m sorry to say that my friend from Oklahoma is helping them. Maybe not directly, but indirectly, and that’s wrong. Government is not inherently bad; government is inherently good. That’s why we have a Constitution and that’s what we direct the activities of this government based upon. (Senate Floor, April 23, 2013)

After Wednesday’s May Day riots, Harry Reid went on The Rusty Humphries radio show and doubled down on the stupid, telling the conservative host that tea party members are the real anarchists.

Rusty Humphries: Do you think the Tea Party are anarchists? That we don’t want any government at all?

Harry Reid: “My experience with the Tea Party is they are against government in any form. They throw monkey wrenches in government. It’s evident, we can’t get things done. They don’t want anything to happen in government.”

It wasn’t too long ago that Dingy was invoking the violent and anarchist-driven Occupy movement on the Senate floor to attack Republicans, whom he charged only cared about “the 1%”.

“In recent days, Republicans showed new interest in the gulf between rich and poor that has motivated thousands to occupy parks across the country and make their voices heard. Apparently they believe the staggering income inequality makes a good talking point,” Reid said on the Senate floor. “While Democrats fight for jobs for the middle class, Republicans fight for tax breaks for the 1 percent of Americans who don’t need our help.”

Shhhh….don’t anyone tell Dingy that Anarchist organizer Lisa Fithian is one of the top organizers of  his darling Occupy movement, and that  Tea Party and Occupy  couldn’t be any more different from each other It’s obviously too nuanced a concept for his tiny pea sized brain to grasp that the tea party’s support for good government and limited government is not the same thing as supporting NO government. Or maybe he does know the difference but he is just cynically (albeit awkwardly and stupidly) demonizing the tea party because he feels the need to push the Regime’s “right wing extremist” narrative.

Whatever. Just shut up Harry. Let the smarter commies do the talking.


Dingy Harry’s Long, Sordid History of Verbal Diarrhea

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Guilty Of “Dereliction Of Duty” On Benghazi (Video)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) had stern words for former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton regarding her performance at the State Department today on The Kuhner Report. Noting that “the person in charge of the State Department never read any of the cries for help” and her department denied their requests for enhanced security, he said Clinton was guilty of “a dereliction of duty that should preclude her from holding any kind of position where she’d be in that kind of authority again.”

Asked if he thought she committed perjury, Rand said it was equally damning either way. Either she didn’t do her job properly because she didn’t read the cable from a war zone like Benghazi which is awful, or she did deny the enhanced security which is also awful.

And he expressed doubt that she had never heard about the weapons shipments from Libya through Turkey to Syria since it was something that has been reported in the news media.

Of course, it’s always been the fallback position for senior members of this Regime to plead ignorance on any number of scandals.

Video via MFPolitics

Hillary is damaged goods, not that this disgustingly corrupt MSM isn’t fully capable of resuscitating her in time for 2016.

Video: Pentagon Ban on Proselytizing Discussed on America Live With Megyn Kelly

In a  recent statement the Pentagon confirmed that “Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense…Court martials and non-judicial punishments are decided on a case-by-case basis…”.

The statement, released to Fox News, follows a Breitbart News report on Obama administration Pentagon appointees meeting with anti-Christian extremist Mikey Weinstein to develop court-martial procedures to punish Christians in the military who express or share their faith.

(From our earlier report: Weinstein is the head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and says Christians–including chaplains–sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in the military are guilty of “treason,” and of committing an act of “spiritual rape” as serious a crime as “sexual assault.” He also asserted that Christians sharing their faith in the military are “enemies of the Constitution.”)

Being convicted in a court martial means that a soldier has committed a crime under federal military law. Punishment for a court martial can include imprisonment and being dishonorably discharged from the military.

So President Barack Obama’s civilian appointees who lead the Pentagon are confirming that the military will make it a crime–possibly resulting in imprisonment–for those in uniform to share their faith. This would include chaplains—military officers who are ordained clergymen of their faith (mostly Christian pastors or priests, or Jewish rabbis)–whose duty since the founding of the U.S. military under George Washington is to teach their faith and minister to the spiritual needs of troops who come to them for counsel, instruction, or comfort.

As I wrote in my post at the Conversation, Monday, the US Army has taken on a bizarrely hostile stance toward the Christian faith in recent weeks, blocking the Southern Baptist Convention website because of its “hostile content”, labeling Catholics, Evangelicals, Mormons And Jews ‘Religious Extremists’ during a briefing on religious extremism, and labeling Christian Ministries as ‘Domestic Hate Groups’ in an email.

It should come as no surprise that Weinstein endorses the ultra-left Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who publishes a list of what it deems “hate groups.”

Some Republicans in Congress have been alerted to the problem and have taken some preliminary action, sending a letter to the Secretary of the Army demanding that he rescind and apologize for the absurd briefing that labeled Evangelical Christians, Orthodox Jews, Mormons and Catholics as religious extremist groups alongside Hamas, al Qaeda and the KKK.

Megyn Kelly had Pete Hegseth of Concerned Veterans For America on her show, Thursday, to discuss what is going on at the Pentagon.

Hegseth called Weinstein’s group, “anti-Christian zealots that the Pentagon never should have allowed in for a meeting.

FRC has launched a petition here calling on Secretary Hagel is stop working with Weinstein and his anti-Christian organization to develop military policy regarding religious faith. As of this writing, 124,814 signatures had been received.

Bill Ayers Pal Added to FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist List

Assata Shakur, Joanne Chesimardradicalbillayers2

What do you know – a friend of a friend of our president has been added to the FBI’s  Most Wanted List.

Joanne Chesimard, now living in Cuba as a fugitive after murdering a New Jersey state trooper, will be placed on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist list —  with the reward for her capture doubled —  on Thursday, exactly 40 years after the death of Trooper Werner Foerster.

Some of New Jersey’s top lawmen will gather at the FBI’s headquarters in Newark to announce that Chesimard is being added to the FBI terrorist list, a law enforcement official said.

FBI Special Agent in Charge Aaron T. Ford, the new head of the FBI’s Newark Division, also is expected to announce that the reward for Chesimard’s capture is being doubled to $2 million, the official said.

Chesimard, a black militant who has been living under the name of Assata Shakur in Cuba for more than 25 years, was convicted in 1977 of killing Foerster during a gun battle on the New Jersey Turnpike in 1973. Three gunmen posing as visitors broke her out of the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in Clinton in 1979. Chesimard eluded capture and resurfaced in the mid-1980s in Cuba, where she has since lived under the protection of the Castro regime.

New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa, State Police Superintendent Col. Rick Fuentes and Juan Mattos, Jr., the U.S. marshal for New Jersey, are expected to join Ford for the update on the efforts to recapture Chesimard.

Chesimard became the subject of an embarrassing controversy for President Obama two years ago, when Michelle Obama invited the rapper Common to appear at a White House arts event. Common had released a work called “A Song for Assata,” which contained lyrics such as “Your power and pride is beautiful. May God bless your soul.”

The backlash over the invitation was immediate, with the union representing state troopers pointing out that the Assata in question was Chesimard.

That was just an awkward coincidence. I’m sure the Obamas have no sympathy for cop killers. Just because they were close “family friends” with the guy whose organization help bust her out of prison when Obama was eight years old…or 20 something years old…or whatever…it means nothing.

The BLA has also worked with the Weather Underground Organization (WUO), another domestic terrorist group. In 1970 the WUO, led by William Ayers, declared war against the United States Government and engaged in a series of high profile bombings. The Ayers organization and the BLA were also involved in the armed prison escape of Joanne Chesimard, in which officers were taken hostage at gunpoint. In a continuum of violence and crime, the WUO and the BLA were responsible for the infamous 1981 Brinks robbery, where police officers and security personnel were murdered. William Ayers was not convicted for his crimes due to procedural errors during the manhunt. Ayers, however, admitted to his crimes. This admission was not from a sense of repentance but from a sense of regret that he didn’t commit more crimes. Today, William Ayers is a college professor and friends with Barack Obama according to a mutual houseguest, Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician. According to Barack Obama’s own campaign, Ayers and Obama are “certainly friendly.”

Another friend of Bill Ayers is in the news, today: BUSTED: Nasty Lib Activist Threatened Herself With Rape – Blamed It on Conservatives …Update: Think Progress Award-Winning Blogger and Pals With Bill Ayers



Nasty liberal student activist Meg Lanker-Simons faked a hate crime last week. The liberal threatened herself with rape and blamed it on local conservatives. Police later discovered Lanker-Simons posted the threats herself.

Yet another left-wing “Fake the hate” story. These people are so deranged.

And finally, Bill Ayers’ most high profile pal was in the news, today for signing a bill to end air traffic control furloughs, and traveling to Mexico to pitch immigration reform.



Whose Side Is Obama On? (Video)

Obama has never been a president for all of the American people. From the very beginning of his Regime,  he immediately set out to divide Americans and pit us against each other. He is a president who  has been  working to demoralize, discourage and defeat a large percentage of us. For the first time in our lives, we know we have a president who is not on our side.

Frank Gaffney, The Washington Times asks  Whose side is Obama on?

In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, the investigation into its perpetrators has been marred by a series of bizarre and even alarming actions by President Obama and his administration. Unfortunately, these increasingly suggest a pattern that is at odds with our national and homeland security. The question must be occurring to many Americans: Whose side is he on?

Consider just a few of the recent examples suggesting the ominous answer is “not ours”:

Team Obama decided precipitously to charge the surviving alleged bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, in civilian court. This action resulted in his being read Miranda rights and obtaining a lawyer, prompting him to refuse to answer more questions from investigators. Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy observed, “Obama was determined to end the public debate over whether the jihadist is a wartime enemy combatant or a mere criminal defendant.”

Mr. McCarthy theorizes on what is going on here: “[We] are being softened up. Steered by its Gitmo bar veterans and lawyer left compass, the Obama administration is executing a massive national-security fraud: the farce that the jihad against America can be judicialized, that civilian-court processes are a better answer to enemy warfare than are combat protocols.”

Then there is the peculiar case of the Saudi “student,” Abdul Rahman al-HarbiGlenn Beck and syndicated columnist Diana West have done yeoman’s work connecting the proverbial dots on this young man, starting with his detention at the scene of the bombing (where he was wounded) and initial designation as a “person of interest” in the investigation. The FBI reportedly spent seven hours searching his apartment but, following an in-person and unscheduled intervention with Mr. Obama by the Saudi foreign minister, Mr. al-Harbi ceased to be classified as even a witness to the jihadist attack.

Keep reading….

And with an answer to Gaffney’s question, here’s Glenn Beck: How far down the road are we with the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Arabia?


Linked by Doug Ross, thanks!