Four Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are looking onto the highly suspicious indictment of conservative writer and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, who appeared on the Kelly File with Megyn Kelly, Friday night, to talk about the case.
Concerned that the indictment on campaign finance charges may be an example of “selective prosecution,” Senators Charles Grassley, Jeff Sessions, Mike Lee, and Ted Cruz have sent a letter to FBI Director James Comey asking the bureau to explain the practices that led to D’Souza’s arrest, last month. Byron York of the Washington Examiner reported:
“The Washington Post and other news outlets reported that the U.S. Attorney’s Office said that the investigation that led to the [D’Souza] indictment began as a result of a ‘routine review by the FBI of campaign filings with the FEC of various candidates after the 2012 election,'” the senators wrote. “The articles, however, did not provide any details regarding the scope and methodology of these routine reviews.” Noting speculation that D’Souza might have been singled out for scrutiny, the senators added, “To dispel this sort of public perception that Mr. D’Souza may have been targeted because of his outspoken criticisms of the president, it is important for the FBI to be transparent regarding the precise origin of this investigation.” Reminding Comey that during his Senate confirmation hearings he had promised a more transparent FBI, the senators posed several questions.
I really do wish Republicans would stop tip-toeing around these scandals. Obama is only going to get worse because they are letting him. Nixon was impeached for much, much less than this guy has gotten away with.
On the Kelly File, D’Souza was able to tell Megyn Kelly that he knew that the president had been “unnerved” and “upset” by his first film 2016 . He then added, if that if Obama was unnerved by 2016 – wait until his new film, America comes out.
Asked how he knows that the president was upset about the movie, 2016, D’Souza answered, “a few weeks after the movie came out, there was a vituperative attack on me and on 2016 that appeared on Barack Obama’s personal website, barackobama.com in which he railed against the film as a smear campaign and took issue with a number of the facts in the film — he was wrong on every instance, but it was very clear from his diatribe that the film got under his skin.”
The “vituperative attack” was by Obama’s “Truth Team”, Sept. 5, 2012: “2016: Obama’s America” is a deliberate distortion of President Obama’s record and world view.
Kelly asked D’Souza if after the movie came out, he feared he may have “pushed it too far”, and would be retaliated against. D’Souza answered that he had always heard that Obama was a very vindictive guy. He added that while he was in Kenya, the Obama family was extremely paranoid and protective of Obama.
Megyn was incredulous that the president be capable of this sort of retribution, but D’Souza reminded her that the director for the movie, Gerald Molan was targeted by the IRS shortly after the movie came out. (Much like the ObamaCare critics, Bill Elliot and C. Steven Tucker, last Fall.) “It’s part of the broader pattern of going after people who are critics”, he continued. “Not just me. The Hollywood guys – the Friends of Abe…he treats his critics not as merely people who disagree – but as enemies.” He pointed out that this is a big theme of Saul Alinsky, “you don’t treat opponents as well meaning people who disagree with you – but as bad guys who must be polarized and demonized – and that’s what the Obama administration has been doing in general.”
We should all be painfully aware by now of how Obama frames every dispute with Republicans. They never oppose him because they have principled disagreements with his policies. It’s because they’re playing petty politics, or they just don’t want to let the black man win. It’s a horribly divisive tactic he’s employed time and again.
I’m watching the movie right now. Will report back…thanks
Of course D’Souza is being treated as an enemy. Anyone who disagrees with The Won must be evil!
Seriously, the 2014 and 2016 elections are absolutely critical. They will determine whether the Democrats can achieve the permanent and absolute hegemony they’ve sought since Woodrow Wilson, or whether there’s still some truth to our veneer as a constitutional federated republic of sovereign states and free individuals. The Democrats know this, which is why they’re now going all out to suppress dissent, intimidate their opponents, and destroy the reputations of important pro-freedom figures with slanderous imputations (cf. Scott Walker).
Pingback: [VIDEO] Dinesh D’Souza: ‘Vindictive’ Obama Sees Critics ‘Not Merely as People Who Disagree, but as Enemies’ | pundit from another planet
Pingback: Watcher of Weasels » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | Liberty's Spirit
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | Nice Deb
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | NoisyRoom.net
Pingback: Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | therightplanet.com
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | askmarion
Pingback: Watcher of Weasels » The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results
Pingback: The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | therightplanet.com
Pingback: The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | Liberty's Spirit
Pingback: The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | Nice Deb
Pingback: Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results – 02/28/14
Pingback: The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results 02.28.14 | askmarion
Pingback: Watchers of Weasels! The Council Has Spoken | www.independentsentinel.com
Pingback: The Razor » Blog Archive » The Council Has Spoken: February 28, 2014
Pingback: Watcher’s Council Nominations – Buh Bye Piers Edition | www.independentsentinel.com