Saturday Movie Matinee: Let’s Have A National Conversation On Black Crime Rates

Obama, Holder and Sharpton want us to have a “national conversation on race,” but on their terms – which casts blacks as victims of white racism/bias and violence. An honest conversation on race would acknowledge the high crime rates among young black males who commit over 50% of the homicides.

The conversation we should be having on race should focus on the real problems. There’s a small but virulent black sub-culture that seems to glorify violence and is characterized by widespread criminality, unemployment, high rates of out-of-wedlock births, and generational welfare dependency.  It’s a criminally predisposed gang culture that “lives and dies by the gun.”

Instead of being baited into a conversation into the left’s false narratives about unfair police practices and rare episodes of white on black crime, the nation should be having a legitimate conversation about the racial plagues of black on black and black on white crime. 

Here’s a contribution to the conversation via the Washington Times:

Today blacks are about 13 percent of the population and continue to be responsible for an inordinate amount of crime. Between 1976 and 2005 blacks com­mitted more than half of all murders in the United States. The black arrest rate for most offenses — including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes — is still typically two to three times their representation in the population. Blacks as a group are also overrepresented among persons arrested for so-called white-collar crimes such as counterfeiting, fraud and embezzlement. And blaming this decades-long, well-documented trend on racist cops, prosecutors, judges, sentencing guidelines and drug laws doesn’t cut it as a plausible explanation.

“Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and Richard Herrnstein in their classic 1985 study, “Crime and Human Nature.” “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.

“The overrepresentation of blacks among arrested persons persists throughout the criminal justice system,” wrote Wilson and Herrnstein. “Though prosecutors and judges may well make discriminatory judgments, such decisions do not account for more than a small fraction of the overrepresentation of blacks in prison.” Yet liberal policy makers and their allies in the press and the academy consistently downplay the empirical data on black crime rates, when they bother to discuss them at all. Stories about the racial makeup of prisons are commonplace; stories about the excessive amount of black criminality are much harder to come by.

“High rates of black violence in the late twentieth century are a matter of historical fact, not bigoted imagination,” wrote Mr. Stuntz. “The trends reached their peak not in the land of Jim Crow but in the more civilized North, and not in the age of segrega­tion but in the decades that saw the rise of civil rights for African Americans — and of African American control of city governments.” The left wants to blame these outcomes on racial animus and “the system,” but blacks have long been part of running that system. Black crime and incarceration rates spiked in the 1970s and ’80s in cities such as Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington under black mayors and black police chiefs. Some of the most violent cities in the United States today are run by blacks.

Via Bill Whittle at Truth Revolt: Ferguson and the Real Race War:

According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, in 2010, 62,593 blacks were the victims of white violence. During that same year, 320,082 whites were the victims of black violence. That’s five times as many violent attacks, but that number is misleading, since the black and white populations are not the same size. When 38 million black Americans commit five times as many violent crimes on 197 million whites as they receive, what you discover is that black perpetrators violently assault White victims TWENTY-FIVE times more frequently. When it comes to a specific kind of violent crime — aggravated assault — the number of black on white crimes is TWO HUNDRED TIMES HIGHER than white on black crimes. Oh, there’s an epidemic of racial violence in America, all right.

Reporter and author Colin Flaherty has taken a cold, clear-eyed view of the statistics that don’t make the news because they are suppressed by the news. He reports, for example — again in 2010 — the National Crime Victimization Survey reported approximately 13,000 black-on-white rapes and 39,000 black-on-white robberies – both violent crimes. The statistics show that the number of white on black rapes and violent robberies were so small that they had to be rounded to the nearest whole number, and that whole number was ZERO.

If you’ve already seen this, (I’ve posted it, before) feel free to skip it. But it’s one of Whittle’s best and well worth another watch.

Colin Flaherty is doing his part to contradict the liberal narrative that there is an epidemic of white crime against blacks. As he documents over and over again at his YouTube channel  – the opposite is true.

Colin Flaherty: Black violence and inter-racial dating:

As Flaherty always notes, there may be similar episodes of white on black violence over inter-racial dating – but the numerous instances of black on white violence is way out of proportion.

Cleveland: Large scale black mob violence at movie theater:

If you can produce repeated episodes of white mob violence at movie theaters, be my guest. But this appears to primarily be a black mob thing.

Colin Flaherty: Pizza delivery guys victims of black crime and murder:


PJTV: Afterburner | Think Small! Bill Whittle’s Recipe for Success in 2015:

Reason TV: How Eva Moskowitz Outmuscled the Teachers Union:

In November 2003, Eva Moskowitz, then a freshman member of the New York City Council, held explosive public hearings about how union contracts imposed inane work rules on public schools. The city’s political establishment was astonished.

Mosowitz—a former history professor, public school teacher, and self-proclaimed liberal, whose politics up until that point seemed to resemble those of every other Democratic politician in New York—was sacrificing her political career to take on organized labor. Exposing the consequences of teacher union contracts was a direct affront to the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), which wields enormous influence in New York City elections.

Moskowitz didn’t pussyfoot. At one point in the hearings, she even played audio testimony from a whistleblower with a disguised voice. She said that many of her sources declined to appear because they feared union retribution. She also went toe-to-toe with Randi Weingarten, the UFT’s confrontational leader.

Two years later, when Moskowitz ran for Manhattan Borough President, Weingarten and the UFT mobilized against her and sunk her candidacy. So Moskowitz left politics for the time being; if she couldn’t transform the system from within, she would build an alternative to the public schools.

Today, Moskowitz is the founder and CEO of Success Academy, which is the city’s largest and most successful charter school network. With 32 schools around New York City—staffed by a non-union teaching force—Success Academy posted test results last year that astounded education policy experts.

Meanwhile, Moskowitz and her charter school allies started building a powerful coalition to counter the outsized political influence of organized labor. In March, when New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) tried to squash Success Academy’s expansion plans, Moskowitz bused 11,000 charter school parents and kids up to the state capital in Albany to protest—and New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo came out in support. De Blasio retreated. Success Academy could move forward with its expansion plans after all, and state lawmakers quickly passed a bill to protect charter schools from future interference by the mayor.

Fox News: Pope’s acknowledgment of climate change reveals ‘population control’ agenda:

Yeah, I’m not too thrilled with this pope.

PJ Media: Trifecta Makes Its 2015 New Year’s Resolutions:

Charles Krauthammer New Year’s resolution:

“A Disgrace”: De Blasio Enrages Cops Anew With Reappointment of “Set-‘Em-Free” Brooklyn Judge


Photo via The NY Post

In recent weeks, Mayor Bill de Blasio has had to endure boos, the turned backs of  New York police officers, and 2 high-flying airplane banners – the first one saying, “De Blasio, our backs have turned to you” and the second one calling on him to “apologize to the NYPD!!”

In the face of this, De Blasio has shocked NY wags with his decision to retain a controversial judge who recently freed without bail two men who threatened cops just days after the double police assassination.

Via The New York Post: 

The stunning decision came even as one of the suspects — a gang member charged with posting police death threats online — skipped a court date and had a warrant out for his arrest, sources said.

Brooklyn Criminal Court Judge Laura Johnson had faced a midnight expiration of her term. She was appointed by then-Mayor Mike Bloomberg in January 2013.

Her one-year, interim reappointment by de Blasio outraged law enforcement officials a day after he met with the heads of five police unions to heal his fractured relationship with cops.

“The mayor’s actions of reappointing this judge are completely hypocritical to his argument that he’s pro-police and counterproductive to what he claims to be an effort to open dialogue going forward,” said sergeants union chief Ed Mullins.

“He had the opportunity to demonstrate good will and support for the police, and he once again has demonstrated the opposite.”

The head of the state ­court officers union, Dennis Quirk, called de Blasio’s decision “a disgrace.”

“It sends a strong message to every police officer and everyone in the law enforcement community that it’s OK to threaten the lives of cops,” Quirk said.

Coley, Devon_Threat.jpg

Coley, 18,  posted this chilling photo on his Facebook a few hours after a man executed two NYPD officers in their police cruisers.



He wrote “73Nextt,” under the photo in reference to the 73rd Precinct that covers his neighborhood.

After The Post exposed Coley’s no-bail release in the NYPD threat case, Johnson was informally admonished by an official with the Office of Court Administration, sources have said. The court administrator told Johnson she “should be setting an example to the public that threatening or assaulting police officers isn’t an acceptable thing,” one source said.

But that didn’t stop Johnson from freeing another man who threatened a police officer, later that day. He was charged with attacking a cop outside a Chinese restaurant in Brooklyn.

After he was pepper sprayed and stunned with a taser, Travis Maye, 26, told cops “You will die!”


Well, if the Mayor of NYC doesn’t have their backs – at least the DOJ, does, right? … Holder’s DOJ…

Well…. not exactly.

They’re actually funnelling money to a group that produces cop-killer rap videos. That’s all.


The Obama administration’s Justice Department funneled at least $1.5 million in grants to a New York legal-aid group featured in a new rap video that depicts two young black men aiming handguns at a white police officer.

Some may find the lyrics eerily similar to the social media postings of the man accused of shooting and killing two New York City police officers execution-style in Brooklyn on Saturday.

The video for  “Hands Up,” which also shows a white police officer gunning down a black motorist wearing a hoodie, contains lyrics suggesting revenge for much-publicized deaths of black men in confrontations with police.

Credited to rappers Uncle Murda and Maino, the video is subtitled “Eric Garner Tribute,” a reference to a black man who died while being pinned and restrained on a sidewalk by New York police officers.
The taxpayer money that went to the organization shown in the video, the Bronx Defenders, comes from a Justice Department program named for Edward Byrne, a New York Police Department officer who was shot dead at close range in 1988.

Well there’s irony for you – a program named for an officer who was shot dead while on duty, becomes a promoter of  cop-killer videos.  This is a prime example of how the left completely twists, perverts and utterly corrupts every single thing it gets its slimy hooks into. That is not hyperbole. It’s absolutely true.

And taxpayers get to foot the bill: Taxpayers Not Likely to Get Refund From Legal-Aid Group in ‘Kill a Cop’ Video:

The Daily Signal first reported that the Justice Department has made five grants to Bronx Defenders totaling $1.5 million through a program named forEdward Byrne, a New York Police Department officer shot dead at close range in 1988.

Bronx Defenders, depicted in the video’s script as caring for a grieving mother whose son apparently has been killed by police, also received more than $100 million from city taxpayers since 2007, the New York Post reported earlier this month.

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of a book about Attorney General Eric Holder, told The Daily Signal:

Taxpayers should be outraged but not surprised that the Holder Justice Department is funding an organization involved in a video inciting the murder of police officers — and what is most outrageous about it is that the Justice Department is using taxpayers funds through a program named for a New York police officer murdered in 1988.  Not only should this organization be cut off from all federal funding, but everyone at Justice involved in approving this grant should lose their jobs.

This is what happens when the left is given too much power. When will people ever learn?