Jeanine Pirro: Obama Is Comfortable With (Islamic) Extremism (Video)

Jeanine Pirro began her show, Saturday night by criticizing the president’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast, saying that  “Barack Obama is comfortable with extremism,” and making plain in her ensuing comments what type of extremism he is comfortable with.

“It explains why he goes golfing within minutes of announcing the beheading of an American,” she contended.

Pirro continued, “with the Crusaders you so easily identify them as Christians, why is it so hard for you to identify today’s jihadi terrorists as Muslim?…That was then and this is now, the Koran is interpreted by some as demanding jihad, the taxing or killing of nonbelievers, and a worldwide caliphate, and, surprise, today’s terrorists are beheading, imposing that same Jizya tax, and in their march to create an even bigger Islamic state. Stop apologizing and stop pussyfooting around with this language dance. We get it. Not all Muslims are terrorists. It was Egypt, the country of 90% Muslim, that rose up against the jihadists, who were also Muslim…Mr. president, please identify what other violence is being committed against Americans in the name of any other religion, or, is it just coincidence?”

She concluded, “the overwhelming majority of Americans think it’s at least somewhat likely Islamic terrorists will launch an attack on US soil soon. But I believe you are so comfortable with extremism, that you’ve lost an understanding of the danger to Americans. You boast a security policy of strategic patience. What are you waiting for? While you wait, they keep winning, and Iran gets closer to nuclear enrichment, all the while you open your borders, reduce our military, and criticize Americans and America at the UN and in Cairo. If nothing more, you’re consistent, extremism is just the part of life. But the danger, your nonchalant attitude puts our entire nation in jeopardy.”

The alarming truth is – other than their votes – this president has had little use for Christians and Jews – and since he has no more elections to win, the mask is slipping.  He has always erred on the side of the Islamist extremists over moderates.

My diagnosis remains what it has always been – Obama is an atheist with Islamic sympathies and with antipathy toward Christians and Jews. Obviously this does not bode well for our country.

Pirro had on a former Muslim Brotherhood terrorist/Christian convert to talk about the Islamic State’s child recruitment practices.



David Gelernter, National Review: Obama’s Political Prayer His remarks were meant to establish his own moral superiority.

As we have seen many times, there is no moment so grave that our current president will not to use it to get up on his high horse, take a shot at Western civilization, and emphasize his own moral superiority.

Why were his comments at the National Prayer Breakfast on “terrible deeds in the name of Christ” so deeply offensive? It wasn’t easy to say right away. We have two minds that work simultaneously, our feeling mind and our thinking mind; they nearly always reach the same conclusion, but our feeling minds often get there first by a mile — they feel instantly that something is wrong — and we are left sputtering inside, angry, in need of a few moments to say why. Here is why:

Ralph Peters, National Review: Obama’s Shaky HistoryJihadis did much more damage than Crusaders.

In his ignorant and bigoted remarks to religious leaders this week, President Obama parroted jihadi propaganda. Bored (when not annoyed) by facts, the president referred to the Crusades and the Inquisition as evidence of the horrors religion can wreak. That kind of talk emboldens the Islamist line that Christian bad behavior justifies the Middle East’s bad behavior even today.

The president knows as little about history as he does about warfare, and even less about religion. But he’s not alone. With the Left’s successful destruction of history instruction in our schools and universities, even “well-educated” creatures of Washington accept the Arab fantasy that the cultural incompetence, practical indolence, and spiritual decay of the entire Middle East stems from Richard Coeur de Lion’s twelfth-century swordplay.

Stop it! All of you! And try reading a book or two on the subject. Meanwhile, here’s a starter course in the vast tragedy jihad has posed for every civilization it’s touched for the past 14 centuries — while the Crusades mythologized by Islam’s apologists were a two-century blip whose only practical legacies are a few ruined castles.

Jonah Goldberg, NRO: Obama The Show: The president’s equivocating radical Islam and Christianity is straight out of an Aaron Sorkin script.


Jeanine Pirro: ‘That Bergdahl 5-for-1 Gitmo Deal Stunk from the Git-Go’!

On Saturday night’s “Justice with Judge Jeanine, the host assailed the Obama administration for the prisoner swap of the Taliban 5 for Bowe Bergdahl, saying “it stunk from the get-go.”

“This week US officials confirmed that one of the five is attempting to return to terrorist activity with the Taliban. Now, there’s a shock, and I’m not talking about White House ineptitude. I’m talking about an enemy so hardened and so determined that they are willing to play the silly little games that we are so naively willing to believe that they’ll be good boys, proven by the fact that they’ve taken up yoga and they plan to go home and start farming. I didn’t know the Taliban grew anything other than opium,” Pirro said.

She continued, “let me see if I get this, an American like James Foley is held for two years and then beheaded, we don’t negotiate for him, but we do negotiate for someone who was widely believed to be a deserter both inside and outside the Pentagon. Since when do we trade mass murderers for someone like this guy, Bergdahl? Remember, Mr. President, you never told Congress, as you are legally required to, that you were doing this lopsided deal. Maybe you needed those hugs with Bergdahl’s mom, and dad in the Rose Garden. But even then there was something that wasn’t right, and don’t give me this hogwash that these are prisoners of war who have to be freed when we leave Afghanistan. First of all, we haven’t left Afghanistan, there are still 10,000 Americans there. We know that you don’t like the military, but why replenish the enemy when the number of remaining American troops is at its lowest? A little primer here. Gitmo detainees are not prisoners of war, the Taliban is not a country, they don’t wear a uniform, they don’t follow chain of command, they don’t carry arms openly, and they kill civilians. As such, they are enemy combatants who can be held indefinitely, or until they cease to be a danger to us. Now, Mr. President, I know you don’t like terms like ‘Islamic extremist’ and ‘jihad,’ but now you don’t like the word ‘terrorist’? Now the Taliban are not terrorists?”

She concluded, “here’s the bottom line. they kill Americans, they’re terrorists. They kill schoolchildren, they’re terrorists. and just yesterday, this so-called armed insurgency, the Taliban, proudly took credit for killing three Americans, and you want to call them armed insurgents? So I say to myself, ‘what difference does it make?’ Here’s the difference. Since you did negotiate with terrorists and you’re not supposed to negotiate with terrorists, you can’t call them terrorists, so now you have to call them armed insurgents.”

See Also:

Andrew C. McCarthy, NRO: Why Obama Needs to Pretend the Taliban Aren’t Terrorists:

In the United States, Obama is operating in a political environment where the public — based on longstanding prudential American policy — believes we should not negotiate with terrorists because that encourages and legitimizes their savage methods. Similarly, the public strongly believes international terrorists are enemies who must be defeated, not defendants who must be indicted. Obama knows he is negotiating with, intends to settle with, and eventually will leave Afghanistan to the tender mercies of, the Taliban. Therefore, the administration is desperate that you not look at the Taliban as terrorists.


Jeanine Pirro: “We’re Not Winning The War On Terror”

Jeane Pirro took the opportunity to blast the president’s “strategy” for the global war on terror, starting with his insistence on emptying Gitmo at a time when Islamic terrorism is on the rise and replenishing the enemy.

“ISIS is bigger, richer, and more determined than it’s ever been,” Pirro lamented.

“I believe that without the will to destroy the enemy, without the purpose of winning at all costs, we simply cannot and will not succeed.”

Pirro listed off an impressive array of unfortunate policies that have been adopted by the Obama Regime.

“We don’t win by returning the enemy to the battlefield,” she began. “We don’t win by failing to identify the enemy, or by cutting back the military to pre-WWII levels, we don’t win by removing the word Islamic from extremist in White House talking points, we don’t win by apologizing for Americans who simply expressed their First Amendment free speech rights, and we don’t win  by allowing people who joined radicalized groups to remain here in the United States. We don’t win by treating Jihad as a law enforcement problem giving Constitutional rights to terrorists. We don’t win by dismantling intel programs that put undercover officers in Mosques in Muslim areas, and  we don’t win by scheduling another conference. We don’t win by leaving our border open,” she concluded.

Policies she recommended included cutting off funding for terror-supporting nations, encouraging other Muslim nations to duplicate Egypt’s refusal to tolerate Islamic extremists, stop worrying about the politics, and start talking about solutions.

Pirro had Col David Hunt (Retired) on to discuss the global war on terror.

And to the delight of leftists everywhere, she apologized for the mistake her guest Steven Emerson made last week, when he declared that the city of Birmingham, England is a “totally Muslim” “no-go zone.” It is in fact only about 22% Muslim and 46% Christian. Prime Minister David Cameron said he choked on his porridge when he heard what Emerson, a guest who probably won’t be returning to Fox News any time soon, said.

Jeanine Pirro: “Kill Them” (Video)

Judge Jeanine Pirro took on the growing threat of Islamic terror in her opening statement, Saturday night.

As usual, she didn’t mince words, opening her show with this blunt assessment: “We need to kill them.”

To do this, she advocated assisting moderate Muslims by “arming them to the teeth” so they can take out the “Islamic fanatics.” She also called for withdrawing support for Muslim nations that don’t help us.

Pirro panned the idiotic  liberal policies that have allowed Muslim extremists to integrate themselves into our society, saying we are “assisting our enemy in our own destruction.”

“They have conquered us through immigration. They have conquered us through interfaith dialogue. And they have conquered us by co-opting our leaders into a position of embarrassment.”

“They can kill us but we can’t hurt their feelings?” she thundered.

It is time for this to be over, she concluded.

Bonus Video:

Col. Ralph Peters is always good for a soundbite or two.

His idea for fighting  Islamic Terror: “You go wherever the enemy is. You kill the enemy without mercy, and you leave behind smoking ruins & screaming widows and if the terrorists reconstitute, you come back and you kill them again,” Peters declared.

Hell yes.

“If you’re going to go to war, go to win, otherwise stay home and raise the white flag.”

Judge Jeanine: ‘Why Do We Stand By And Watch The Genocide Of Christians In The Middle East?’

In Saturday night’s opening statement on Justice with Judge Jeanine Pirro, the fiery host focused on the desperate plight of  Christians in the Middle East who are facing genocide at the hands of Islamic oppressors like ISIS.

Pirro began by noting that while children here in the West, experience a time of wonder and excitement during the holidays, “for many Christian children only fear and sadness are reflected in their eyes deadened by the unspeakable torture and abuse they’ve witnessed.”

“Why do we stand by and watch the genocide of Christians in the Middle East?” Pirro asked plaintively. “It’s history repeating itself – but remember – it is to our detriment, this time. Six million Jews were killed in the holocaust while the world looked the other way.”

Pirro interviewed Thomas Zane,Vicar General of the Antioch Orthodox Archdiocese of North America about the Christian genocide in the Middle East.



ISIS Plants Bombs In Catholic Church on Christmas Day and Blows it up Next Day

Modern Day Schindler’s List For Life; Provided By You The Supporters Of Rescue Christians

Former NYPD Commish Bernard Kerik: Sharpton and De Blasio “Have Blood On Their Hands”

Two police officers were shot – execution style – as they sat in their patrol car, Saturday afternoon –  5 days before Christmas.

The gunman approached the passenger side of the patrol car and took a shooting stance, witnesses told police. He opened fire several times, striking both officers in the head, Bratton said.

They were “shot and killed with no warning, no provocation,” Bratton told reporters. “They were quite simply, assassinated.”

The gunman was found dead in a nearby subway station from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Saturday night on Fox News, Judge Jeanine Pirro covered the latest and interviewed former New York Police Department commissioner Bernard Kerik, who said the killings reminded him of the radical days of the ’60s and 70’s when NY cops faced executions (by radicals) and declared that Mayor Bill de Blasio and Al Sharpton both “have blood on their hands.”

Kerik accused de Blasio of “inciting” protesters who chanted “kill the cops” during a protest on the Brooklyn Bridge last Saturday.

“I personally feel, that Mayor de Blasio, [Al] Sharpton and others like them, they actually have blood on their hands,” Kerik said on FOX News. “They encouraged this behavior. They encouraged protests. These so-called peaceful protests that, where people are standing out there saying ‘kill the cops,’ well, I hope they’re happy, because they got what they wanted.”

“I think back two weeks ago, when he was inciting these protesters, when he was calling the NYPD and other cops around the nation racist,” Kerik also said.

Former NYPD police detective Bo Dietl joined Kerik in the discussion, adding details about what cops like him faced in the early 70’s.

“We lost 13 cops, one year, 11 cops the next year – they were assassinated the same way. This was with the PLA,” he explained, referring to the Black Liberation Army.

Dietl told Pirro that gang members have been threatening to kill cops in social media for the past week and he excoriated Mayor De Blasio who he called “a disgrace”  and “this punk Al Sharpton” who led the demonstration in NY, last week, where protesters chanted they wanted dead cops. “Well they got two dead cops!” Dietl exclaimed.

He threw in this shot at De Blasio; “you know what? This guy went to Cuba in 1994 – he should take his wife – De Blasio – and go back and live there.”

Dietl said the city should recall “the bum.” Asked by Pirro if he should resign, he said De Blasio should “resign tomorrow because he cannot do the job.”

“He should go,” Kerick agreed. “He can’t lead the city. The men and women in the NYPD don’t respect him. They’re never going to respect him.”

Here’s video of NYPD officers turning their backs on DeBlasio:

Via Twitchy: 

Al Sharpton, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jesse Jackson, the Ferguson Action Coalition and even the family of Michael Brown issued statements Saturday on the horrific killings.

Obama finally weighed in at 12:00 am Eastern after he finished his golf game in Hawaii:

It’s odd that the president of the United States felt it was necessary to qualify his condemnation as “unconditional.” Was there reason to believe his condemnation would be conditional? Would the killing of two cops ever be excusable? So why make a point of saying “unconditionally”?


Twitchy:‘Can they breathe?’ Execution-style killing of two NYPD officers celebrated; ‘Salute the shooter’

Obama/Sharpton/Holder/DeBlasio fellow travelers weigh in on Twitter.