Saturday Movie Matinee: Clinton Emails ‘Too Damaging’ to Release

Fox News: Clinton Emails Too Damaging to Release:

And FBI is “super pissed off” at the White House spox because of his asinine comments yesterday.

Fox News: State Dept: Hillary Clinton Emails Contain Top Secret Info – Special Report All Star Panel:

Hannity: To Hot To Handle – State Dept Confirms Top Secret Files On Clinton’s Email Server – Fox & Friends:



PJ Media: Fox News: Contacts in the FBI and DOJ are ‘Super Pissed Off’ at the White House

PJTV: Trump | Afterburner with Bill Whittle:

PJTV: Picking Your President – Part 1: Policies That Matter

PJTV: Picking Your President – Part 2: A Proven Track Record?

Yesterday is over! | Marco Rubio for President

Colin Flaherty: Marine Vet with Gun Saves Cop from Black Violence:

Josh Gad as Donald Trump performs The Divinyls’ “I Touch Myself” | Lip Sync Battle:

Emotional Video Shows a Soldier Buying a Meal For Two Young Boys:


Saturday Movie Matinee: The Trump Tapes

Our Principles PAC: The Trump Tapes, Vol. I: 

Fox News:The Five: Is Donald Trump a ‘menace to American conservatism’?


That’s only true right now, Donald. Wait until the general election campaign begins and all the guns are pointed at you.


National Review: Conservatives Against Trump:


Adiet, caffeine-free Marxist (really, the only thing wrong with being a Marxist is being a Marxist); a driven, leftist crook; and an explosive, know-nothing demagogue — all are competing to see who can be even more like Mussolini than is Obama. But in the caudillo department, surpassing even our own Evita, the Donald wins.

Forget hair like the tinsel on discarded Christmas trees. Forget the long-term connections to New York politichiens, into which scores of opposition researchers and Pulitzer-seeking media moles are undoubtedly tunneling at this very moment. Forget his former wife’s claim that he kept a book of Hitler’s speeches at his bedside. Forget even his raging egomania, matched only by Obama’s, which the president sometimes tries to conceal beneath a laughably transparent gossamer of false modesty.

And forget trying to determine whether he’s a conservative. Given that, at the suggestion of Bill Clinton, he has like a tapeworm invaded the schismatically weakened body of the Republican party, it’s a pointless question, because, like Allah in Islamic theology, he is whatever he pleases to be at the moment, the only principle being the triumph of his will.

All such things, except (maybe) his hair, are disqualifications for high office, but two fundamental portents of disaster usually pass unnoticed: Like Obama, he is astoundingly ignorant of everything that to govern a powerful, complex, influential, and exceptional nation such as ours he would have to know.

I recall that 30 or more years ago he said he could master the politics of the Cold War, nuclear strategy, and arms control in two weeks, the proof being that he had fixed the Wollman ice-skating rink. Evidently he didn’t spare the time, revealing in debate that he was clueless about the nuclear triad — something that could be rather dangerous if the person always at his side with the briefcase of nuclear codes cuffed to his wrist were not a stolid military officer but Britney Spears or Ozzy Osbourne (and don’t count that out).

He doesn’t know the Constitution, history, law, political philosophy, nuclear strategy, diplomacy, defense, economics beyond real estate, or even, despite his low-level-mafioso comportment, how ordinary people live. But trumping all this is a greater flaw presented as his chief strength. Governing a great nation in parlous times is far more than making “deals.” Compared with the weight of the office he seeks, his deals are microscopic in scale, and as he faced far deeper complexities he would lead the country into continual Russian roulette. If despite his poor judgment he could engage talented advisers, as they presented him with contending and fateful options the buck would stop with a man who simply grasps anything that floats by. Following Obama’s, a Trump presidency would be yet more adventure tourism for a formerly serious republic.

Mark Steyn makes some excellent counterpoints:

The movement conservatives at National Review make a pretty nice living out of “ideas, ideology, philosophy, policy, and so forth”. The voters can’t afford that luxury: They live in a world where, in large part due to the incompetence of the national Republican Party post-Reagan, Democrat ideas are in the ascendant. And they feel that this is maybe the last chance to change that.

Go back to that line “When Reagan first ran for governor of California…” Gosh, those were the days, weren’t they? But Reagan couldn’t get elected Governor of California now, could he? Because the Golden State has been demographically transformed. From my book The [Un]documented Mark Steyn:

According to the Census, in 1970 the ‘Non-Hispanic White’ population of California was 78 per cent. By the 2010 Census, it was 40 per cent. Over the same period, the 10-per cent Hispanic population quadrupled and caught up with whites.

That doesn’t sound terribly ‘natural’, does it? If one were informed that, say, the population of Nigeria had gone from 80 per cent black in 1970 to 40 per cent black today, one would suspect something rather odd and profoundly unnatural had been going on.

The past is another country, and the Chamber of Commerce Republicans gave it away. Reagan’s California no longer exists. And, if America as a whole takes on the demographics of California, then “the conservative movement” will no longer exist. That’s why, for many voters, re-asserting America’s borders is the first, necessary condition for anything else – and it took Trump to put that on the table.

Roger L. Simon, PJ Media: National Review’s Jihad Against Trump

Andrew Klavan, PJ Media: Trumpians Get Had

The Kelly File: Exclusive: Clinton Server Contained Intelligence From Human Sources:

The Kelly File: Political Fallout From Clinton Scandals:

PJTV: Is it Actually Gonna Be a Bernie Sanders v. Donald Trump Race?

Marco Rubio: Crime Spree:

Jack Welch: Ted Cruz Does What He Says He’s Going to Do:

Bill Whittle & Stefan Molyneux On The Criminality & Treason Of Hilary & Bill Clinton:

Very lively and interesting discussion between these two.

Disclaimer: I didn’t know who Stefan Molyneux was so I “googled” him and some kinda sketchy stuff came up. So I can’t vouch for him, but will say – judging from this video – he’s obviously intelligent and like Whittle – has a way with words.

PJTV: The Clintons’ War on Women: How Hillary Strong-Armed Women into Accepting Sexual Assault:

Meanwhile in Calais: 

Hell on Earth: Migrants chant “f*** you” in Fiery Inferno as they burn down Calais “Jungle” camp:

“Disgusting, pork eating outsiders nobody would miss” – opinions of “integrated” migrants on Germans:


The UK Express: Horror as gangs of migrants ‘assault female swimmers and masturbate in hot tub’

Another White Kid Beaten by Another Group of Black People — Almost to Death:




Saturday Movie Matinee: Hillary Is A Liar

Hillary Is a Liar Montage: Megan Kelly interviews Benghazi Victims Family:

Full Measure Episode 15:  Rescue Interrupted (P1):

Full Measure Episode 15: Jan 10, 2016 Rescue Interrupted (P2):

PJTV: Is Hillary Clinton Telling the Truth About Her Classified Emails?

Ted Cruz: Trump, Clinton, Cuomo, and de Blasio Demanded an Apology:

Monica Crowley: Obama To Take Out Hillary and Replace Her With This Governor (Video):

PJ Media, Afterburner: The Lottery: Instructions for Winning | Bill Whittle:

Colin Flaherty: Another Young White Guy on a Bike, Killed by a Black Mob in Baltimore:

Colin Flaherty: Another Dead White Deputy — Another Black Person In Jail:

Black Man Murders Two White Kids In Tuscaloosa:

Five Black People Kill Another White Kid — This time in Kentucky:

Black on Old White Dude Murder in Florida:

Fox News Insider: This Video of a Little Boy Reuniting With His Lost Dog Is the Best:

Saturday Movie Matinee: Into the Fog

Back after a two week holiday hiatus, the Saturday Movie Matinee is back.


PJTV: 2016: Into the Fog — Obama, Hillary, Trump, & Space Exploration:

TRIGGER WARNING:  Obama’s New Year’s resolution: Action on unfinished business:

Best of Bill Whittle Uncensored at West Palm Beach Activist Conference:

Wherein Bill goes off on SJWs.

Speaking of which:

Paul Joseph Watson: Top 5 Libtard Fails of 2015:

Fox News: “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” Named One Of “The Biggest Pinocchios Of 2015”


A SJW on Reddit leaves the cult:

Changing was a long process. I initially got into SJW groups sort of through popularity- feminism was supposed to be THE thing for equality, and I wanted everyone to be treated well, so I joined a bunch of feminist forums, which branched into more garden variety SJW circles. Initially I had no idea there was a dark side to it.
I had some weird views before; I think in a lot of ways I was a stereotypical white knight. I was depressed at the time, and being applauded for being progressive definitely was an ego boost. Fighting people I perceived as bigoted made me feel better about myself. My SJW tendencies were based mostly out of self loathing- I felt weird, like an outcast, had never had a girlfriend, hated myself, and thought that I was fixing myself by jumping deep into feminism. I armed myself with a lot of bad statistics (like the 1 in 4 rape stat) and felt smart because of it.
After a while it becomes second nature; you just sort of convince yourself that you’re on the right side and see your opponent as a stereotype out of reflex. That can happen here too, but SJW’s actively encourage it. You become utterly convinced that you’re part of an elite, enlightened group fighting an aging generation of uneducated racists and sexists.
But eventually I started to realize that I had incomplete information. I lost a lot of arguments to people I’d stereotyped as being dumb. The people I called allies just jumped to ad hominem attacks and semantic arguments, and that made them secure in their beliefs. That’s how they operate; when they lose, their mental gymnastics aren’t supposed to convince you. It’s to convince themselves, to justify not changing their sources or beliefs. And it’s very effective at that. It worked for me for a while.
But eventually it wasn’t enough for me. I started trying to revise feminist arguments with new, accurate sources. I’d correct people on my own side on forums and whatnot. They hatedthat, and jumped right to calling me a rape apologist and a woman hater. I was blown away, it contradicted my notion that we were the logical side.
Keep reading at the link…
I can’t help but share this amazing anonymous smackdown of the odious cult of social justice with readers. It’s currently doing the rounds on Twitter and reddit. If anyone knows the author, do get in touch…

“We are fighting to end hate, to unite as one and love each other. We are fighting to be treated right without discrimination and for everyone to have equal opportunities.”

Bullshit. You have no quantifiable metrics for injustice, so you have no victory conditions (for a very simplified example, when blacks hold X% of all engineering jobs and are only Y% of all prisoners, racism is ended). That would be fine by itself, but you believe in fighting injustice with injustice (gays have historically been denied gay marriage? let’s get random CEOs fired for opinions they held six years ago). You don’t seek converts, you seek to punish and bully – straight white males who disagree with you must be purged and publicly humiliated. Even the jihadists will spare you if you convert; no apology or future correction will satisfy a SJW.

I could forgive that too if you weren’t all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissenters is appalling; if they don’t want you acting on their behalf, that’s their choice, not “internalized patriarchy” or whatever. You rob them of moral agency. When called out for these behaviors (as you always insist on calling out others), you lie. You strawman your opponents (criticized a woman? misogynist!), you group them with the worst (you’re a gamer? you’re as bad as the anonymous rape threateners!) and when confronted with your own flaws, you restate them less threateningly (motte and bailey argument). You phrase all arguments as kafkatraps (disagreeing with your assertion that we are evil is taken as proof that we’re evil). You publish manipulated and misleading statistics, then lambast anyone who questions them.

Colin Flaherty: Black Mob Violence at Christmas: 14 Episodes at Malls in Three Days:

Colin Flaherty: Black Mob preys on old people in Florida:

Colin Flaherty: White College Girl Killed by Carful of Black People with a Gun

Colin Flaherty: Believe It Or Not: Black City Councilman Wants Black People to Throw Rocks at Cops:

If 2015 was the year Americans wised up to the SJW mob, let 2016 be the year they wise up to the black grievance mob and “the biggest lie of our generation”–  which is — blacks are relentless victims of relentless white violence and oppression – when the opposite is true.

Black crime and violence against whites, gays, women, seniors, young people and lots of others is astronomically out of proportion.

It just won’t quit. Neither will the excuses. Or the denials. Or the black on white hostility. Or those who encourage it.

A letter from a grieving mother:

Dear Colin,

When we were going through the hearings in court, I remember sitting there listening to the details of our son’s attack, and the mental images it produced, were sometimes more than I could bear. There were times I had to walk out of that court room and get away from everyone and just take a moment to breathe and pray for… something, anything to get through it.

In my nightmares, which happened often, I would see my son getting beaten by those boys, I would hear him call out for help, and while I would try to run to him, I could just never reach him… but I never stopped trying to get to him. He was my boy and he needed me… and as a parent… my instincts to rescue him and protect were overwhelming and constant.

Then I would wake up in tears… sit alone in the quiet of night… a weep. It was then, in those times of quiet, I remember the thought occurring to me that God had a son as well, and He literally saw what happened to His Son. He watched Him get beaten unmercifully and eventually be killed.


I remember a part of scripture where Jesus questioned why God had forsaken Him. Why would God look the other way as His Son called out to Him in pain? While I know that God cannot look on sin, and Jesus took all of the sins of the world on himself, as a parent, I can’t help but think that maybe, just maybe, had God not turned His head away, that He may not have been able to stand watching what was happening anymore without rescuing his Son and stopping the horrific act. The bible states that when Stephen was being stoned to death, that the heavens opened up and he saw Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father.


I recall times when my husband and I would sit on the porch and watch the boys play in the yard, if one of them fell and cried, my husband and I would immediately jump up and stand, waiting to see if our son was ok. When Jesus saw Stephen getting stoned to death, He stood…….one of His children was in distress. Just like a parent, isn’t it?! Throughout the bible, God is described as our Father… a perfect Father… and one who understands our grief.


While going through that with our son, I knew God understood our pain… literally, and that He would not allow us to go through that alone. As a parent, God knew exactly how my husband and I were feeling… because He had been there Himself… with His Only Son. As a result of that thought occurring to me, it made the sacrifice of His Son, take on a whole new perspective for me.


God sacrificed His Only Son for another one of His children… me. This time of year, as I see that baby laying in a manger, I can’t help but cry knowing what His ultimate goal is, and why… and for whom. I don’t know how God did it… as a parent… I can’t fathom watching my son be beaten and not stopping it (and He could have stopped it)… but I am humbly grateful that He didn’t.


When I look at the hands of that little baby in that wooden manger, I can’t help but also see those same hands with nails in them, holding him onto a wooden cross. Tears fill my eyes, my heart breaks, and as a parent, I just want to hold that baby and keep Him safe… but I know He is here… for my sake.


No matter what happens in my life, I know at the end of my life, I will be given a blessing of having a life that I could never have here on Earth… a life with no pain, no tears, no goodbyes and no more hate… all because of that little baby laying in a manger.


So, this Christmas season, please remember the incredible gift that was given to us all, even before we were born… and when you look at that little baby laying in the manger, remember the reason He came here… His sole reason for being born…YOU. We love you all so dearly and we hope everyone has a wonderful Christmas. C***** is doing wonderful, he is healthy, happy and following the path God has set before him. Thank you for your prayers and continue praying. God is still working His plan in all of our lives. (Mama Strange)

Saturday Movie Matinee: Obama’s Our Greatest National Security Threat

Gingrich: Obama represents greatest national security threat:

Former House speaker goes on ‘Hannity’ to talk POTUS’ response to terror
Watch Sean Hannity talk about Counter Terrorism, Executive Branch, Terror, and White House on Hannity.

Megyn Kellly: White House goes silent on terrorism in California:

With Charles Krauthammer…

Obama Breaks Silence: This is insane (Meaning your guns.)

Cali. shooting shows divide between presidential candidates:

Mark Steyn Talks Islamic Terrorism With Howie Carr clip:

PJ Media, Trifecta: Obama’s Fantasy Foreign Policy:

PARIS CLIMATE CHALLENGE: Christopher Monckton:

Viscount Christopher Monckton at The alternative meeting in Paris to the COP 21,The Paris Climate Challenge. More on the site including exclusive interviews here and


Merry Christmas From Black Lives Matter at the White House – and other hoaxes:

Saturday Movie Matinee: Failure of Intelligence

Apologies in advance for the death of content for this week’s matinee. I’m on the road, and my motel has terrible internet service.

Bill Whittle, PJ Media: Failure of Intelligence: How Liberals Cause ISIS Terror Attacks:

But the way, be sure to check out the new design at PJ Media if you haven’t already.

PJ Media Trifecta: Post Paris: Liberals Can’t Blame Terror Attack on Muslims:

YAFTV: Ben Shapiro: Toughen Up Spoiled Children:

Colin Flaherty: Black on white crime Spree in St. Louis. Does anyone notice?