The Left’s War On Conservative Women

As I keep saying, the cynical Democrat election year ploy of labeling Republican reactions to Obama’s contraception mandate as a Republican “War on Women” is deeply disingenuous and absurd on it’s face. Half of the people who make up the Republican party are women, and (just like the men!), we don’t think it’s the government’s responsibility to pay for people’s birth control. We also think it’s a shocking violation of religious liberties for the federal government to force individuals and organizations to buy a product that violates their conscience. That is what the debate is about. It has nothing to do with women’s rights.

After 30 year old reproductive rights activist, Sandra Fluke, testified before Congress to make the case that religious institutions should pay for her contraception needs, Rush went a little overboard to draw attention to the absurdity of it all.

Since she was basically arguing that someone else should pay for her to have sex – to the tune of $1,000 a year, Rush called her a prostitute and a slut. He has since apologized for stooping to the level of discourse more typical of the left. He really should be above that.

But the left’s outrage over one radio personality’s inappropriate comments and their Stalinesque attempt to drum him off the air must be addressed. The orchestrated anti-Rush media campaign has predictably led to multiple death threats against the popular radio host. Because the unhinged left responds to dog whistles, and for the past week the the Dem Media complex has been blowing the whistle on Rush.

And while they hyperventilate over Rush’s comments, they make excuses for the oppression, subjugation and slavery of women under Islam, as Atlas Shrugs notes:Puff Ho Enables Beating of Women, Whitewashes Koran’s Justification for Domestic Violence.

What is the point of the HuffPo publishing pieces like this? The only effect will be to make people complacent about the beating of women in Islam, instead of calling the Muslim community to account and demanding they act to stop this or face prosecution. Does Ariana want Muslim women to get beaten up?

They don’t care. Standing up for Muslim women won’t win them any votes. But attacking conservatives gets the left-wing base all excited.

There has been a war on women in this country, but it’s a war on conservative women as Michelle Malkin rightly notes:

If I had a dollar for every time libs have called me a “Manila whore” and “Subic Bay bar girl,” I’d be able to pay for a ticket to a Hollywood-for-Obama fundraiser. To the HuffPo left, whore is my middle name.

Self-serving opponents argue that such attacks do not represent “respectable,” “mainstream” liberal opinion about their conservative female counterparts. But it was feminist godmother Gloria Steinem who called Texas Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison a “female impersonator.” It was NOW leader Patricia Ireland who commanded her flock to only vote for “authentic” female political candidates. It was Al Gore consultant Naomi Wolf who accused the late Jeane Kirkpatrick of being “uninflected by the experiences of the female body.”

It was Matt Taibbi, now of Rolling Stone magazine, who mocked my early championing of the tea party movement by jibing: “Now when I read her stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of (redacted) in her mouth. It vastly improves her prose.”

It was Keith Olbermann, then at MSNBC and now at Al Gore’s Current TV, who wrote on Twitter that columnist S.E. Cupp was “a perfect demonstration of the necessity of the work Planned Parenthood does” and who called me a “mashed up bag of meat with lipstick on it.” He stands by those remarks. Olbermann has been a special guest at the White House.

Some of us have not forgotten when liberal Wisconsin radio host John “Sly” Sylvester outrageously accused GOP Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of performing “fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee” and sneered that she had “pulled a train” (a crude phrase for gang sex). (Earlier, he called former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a “black trophy” and “Aunt Jemima.”)

Or when MSNBC misogynist Ed Schultz called talk show host Laura Ingraham a “talk slut” for criticizing Obama’s petty beer summit. Or when Playboy published a list of the top 10 conservative women who deserved to be “hate-f**ked.” The article, which was promoted by Anne Schroeder Mullins at Politico.com, included Ingraham, “The View’s” Elisabeth Hasselbeck, former Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino, GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann and others. Yours truly topped the list with the following description: a “highly f**kable Filipina” and “a regular on Fox News, where her tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do me!’”

And then there’s the left’s war on Sarah Palin, which would require an entire national forest of trees to publish.

Leftists think nothing of calling conservative women like Michelle Malkin b*tch, whore, c*nt,  (and much much worse), because as Alec Baldwin explains, “right-wing bashing is the most American thing you can do.”

But it’s really not. It’s merely a common, left-wing past-time.

The Media Research Center has been tracking the the left’s hatred and bile for years. That DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz pretends to act shocked and dismayed over Limbaugh’s comment’s, while ignoring the more serious offenses of her allies in the media tells you all you have to know about her true motives.

On the March 4 “Meet the Press,” Rep. Debbie Wassermann Shultz, D-Fla, was incensed about Limbaugh’s comments, saying “I don’t know any woman in America, David, that thinks that being called a slut is funny.”

What is funny is that Schultz’s disapproval came less than two months after she appeared on Bill Maher’s “Real Time” program on HBO. Unconstrained by broadcast decency codes and advertising, Maher and guests lash out at conservative women in some of the nastiest language and sexual imagery imaginable.

In September, 2011, Maher was talking about Texas Gov. Rick Perry and decided to throw in a vulgar Sarah Palin joke: “He sounded like a sixth grader who didn’t do the reading. Garbled syntax, messing up simple facts, sentences that went nowhere. Sarah Palin was watching and she said, ‘If only he was black, I’d fuck him.’”

That was actually pretty mild for Maher. In March, 2011, he called Palin a “dumb twat.” The same month, according to the Dallas Voice, at a public appearance in Texas, Maher called Palin a “cunt” and said “there’s just no other word for her.”

Also on Maher’s hit parade:

While some say Maher is a comic who says a lot of outrageous things as part of his routine, he’s a regular guest on CNN.

Beating up on Bachmann

Few conservative women seem to raise the left’s hackles more than Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn. The former candidate for the GOP presidential nomination has been called “Barbie with Fangs,” and “Crazy Eyes,” and she’s been accused of being “hypnotized” and “the Mata Hari of Minnesota” by none other than Chris Matthews.

Bachmann has been a frequent target for HBO’s Maher, but also for his guests. In July, 2011, former Air America comedian Marc Maron said of Bachmann’s husband, I hope he fucks her angrily because, because that’s how I would. And I’ve thought about it. I just … It’s a political statement I’m trying to make.”

Liberal radio host Mike Malloy thrilled his dozens of audience members in May 2010 by calling Bachmann a “phony-ass broad” and a “skank.”

The Daily Beast has long had an interest in Bachmann. In 2008, Max Blumenthal called her “The Hate Monger of Minnesota.” In Sept. 2009, the site’s Michelle Goldberg dubbed Bachmann “America’s craziest member of Congress” and wrote that, “for the past year, her lunacy has been particularly vigorous.” Goldberg later wondered, “In today’s GOP, is there such a thing as too crazy? In Nov. 2010, The Daily Beast’s “Cheat Sheet” called Bachmann “a bomb-throwing provocateur generally regarded as too extreme to be taken seriously.”

Rolling Stone Magazine’s Matt Taibbi penned a 5,000-word hit piece on Bachmann in June 2011. He called her a “batshit crazy” “political psychopath” with a “gigantic set of burnished titanium Terminator-testicles swinging under her skirt.”

If you Can’t Beat ‘em, Slime ‘em

Taibbi has another distinction when it comes to conservative women – back in 2009 he launched an almost unbelievably vile, hateful sexual attack on pundit Michelle Malkin.

In a Tax Day 2009 blog post, Taibbi claimed he was “really enjoying this whole teabag thing” and that “it’s really inspiring some excellent daydreaming” that involved Malkin in incredibly vulgar ways.

“[T]his move of hers to spearhead the teabag movement really adds an element to her writing that wasn’t there before,” he wrote. “Now when I read her stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy, set of balls in her mouth. It vastly improves her prose.”

In the same piece, Taibbi said of conservative author Ann Coulter “When you read Ann Coulter, you know you’re reading someone who would fuck a hippopotamus if she thought it would boost her Q rating.”

Keep reading.

A small sampling of left-wing bile was compiled for this video mash-up:

More evidence, (as if it were needed), that Democrats are not serious about improving public discourse: Obama Urges Civility In Public Debate, Dems Respond By Signing Bill Maher For Fundraiser…

To sum up – there is no Republican war against women. Republican opposition to left-wing policies that left-wing women support does not constitute a “war” in any way, shape, or form. It’s a patently absurd, and transparently deceptive argument for the left to make.

There HAS been a war against conservative women (and conservative blacks) for some time now because we refuse to accept the left’s false narratives. And now, there is also a war against the Catholic church, which is being manifested in actual government policies.

Don’t accept the  false narratives of the Democrat media complex.

FIGHT BACK.

UPDATE:

At The American Spectator, Jeffrey Lord reports that the rally for Rush is working:

Limbaugh opened his program today explaining the inside baseball of radio advertising. There is a difference between local advertisers, whose dollars do not go to Limbaugh at all, and national advertisers — like Carbonite. Media Matters — and I debatedMedia Matters’ guy Eric Bohlert yesterday on KQED in San Francisco — deliberately misleads, and knows it, since it surely understands the difference in revenue streams between local and national advertisers.

Limbaugh also announced that new national sponsors are lining up to replace those who left — and notably, that there are at least two who want back in. In fact are “begging” to do so.

MORE evidence (as if it were needed) that Democrats are not serious about improving public discourse:

Exposing Left-Wing Hypocrisy: Sheila Jackson Lee and Jan Schakowsky Refuse to Condemn Bill Maher’s Comments About Palin (Video)

Linked by Michelle Malkin, thanks!

15 Responses to “The Left’s War On Conservative Women”

  1. Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere Says:

    And while the hyperventilate over Rush’s comments, they make excuses for the oppression, subjugation and slavery of women under Islam, as Atlas Shrugs notes:Puff Ho Enables Beating of Women, Whitewashes Koran’s Justification for Domestic Violence.

    That’s what we must do to honor Freedom of religion and avoid religious bigotry.

    Now go back to the living room and finsh watching this week’s episode of “Good Christian Bitches”.

    /sarc off/

  2. right wing Dovahkiin Says:

    Little billy is just made his real-life ‘obama’ vibrator fails routinely (ironically just like the real obama) on him and his cadre of butt buddies from media matters! That and the fact that Michelle Malkin is drop-dead gorgeous (IOW way way out of his league) as well as being much loved and extremely popular among sane educated people, while his little flabby pale butt cant even score a decent rating average on one of the least watched subscription cable channels in existence. What a sad little hateful sorry load of crap this pissant really is. ‘Wittle billy’ maher and the rest of his insane sycophants on the left = Epic Fail at life. Honestly, if O’Rielly didn’t have him on once in a while to debate (why O’Rielly thinks this clown is worthy of any attention at all is beyond me) nobody in their right mind would know who he is, or still care.

  3. Happy International War on Women’s Day | Politicalistas Says:

    [...] Conservative blogger Nice Deb has dug through the internet to compile another collection of left-wing venom and hypocrisy in her post “The Left’s War On Conservative Women.” [...]

  4. Correcting the Liberal Lexicon: War on Women « The Prudence Paine Papers Says:

    [...] Conservative blogger Nice Deb has dug through the internet to compile another collection of left-wing venom and hypocrisy in her post “The Left’s War On Conservative Women.” [...]

  5. Carlos Says:

    Now that #OWS is stale and has lost the attention of “the 99%,” they’ve created the #WOW (WarOnWomen).

    Gosh, one would think they’d take a hint eventually and admit no one cares about their snit fits over false umbrage.

  6. A Guy From Lithia Springs Says:

    I am baffled at how the right continues to maintain that asking for insurance coverage for contraception = asking the government to pay someone to have sex. And all the garbage about who said the most outrageous thing is just a sideshow distracting from the primary point, even if you sort of glossed over the whole Limbaugh thing. Call it “battling for religious freedom” or whatever. But getting between a patient and their doctor regarding contraception cannot be framed as anything but being anti-contraception and anti-women’s health. It is a policy loser, and a strategic political disaster for the GOP.

  7. nicedeb Says:

    Nobody thinks the reproductive rights activist should not have insurance coverage for contraception. She should definitely go some somewhere that provides what she wants. (Although contraception is already quite cheap w/o insurance). She just shouldn’t ask that a Catholic institution violate its conscience and provide it for her. As everyone now knows, she targeted Georgetown with the express interest of forcing the issue. And she was very wrong to do so.

    And no – it’s not a policy loser:

    The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds 38 percent of likely voters think health insurance companies should be required by law to cover the morning after pill without co-payments or other charges to the patient. But 50 percent of Americans disagree and oppose this requirement while 13 percent are undecided.

    http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/22/poll-americans-oppose-obama-birth-control-coverage-mandate/

    It’s a policy loser for YOUR side – which is why you see them changing the subject to Rush Limbaugh’s rhetoric, and pretending there’s a GOP war on women.

  8. Jim Says:

    You might enjoy an article on this subject which appears at http://www.conservativeopinionwire.com. It seems to clearly explain the hidden agenda of the Left’s brand of feminism. It’s entitled “The Republican ‘War on Women.’”

  9. I Agree 100% - Time To Invoke Reagan's 11th Commandment | Latestwire Says:

    [...]  I went back and reread what I had written about Rush’s comments on Sandra Fluke, last March…To be honest, I was not pleased with El Rushbo at the time – but mainly because what he had said was so imprudent. Most of us get it when he does his demonstrating absurdity by being absurd schtick. But during an election year, at a time when the left was on hyper-alert for any slip-ups on our side that would play into their idiotic “Republican War Against Women” narrative, it was inexcusably obtuse of him. Call this constructive criticism: [...]

  10. I Agree 100% – Time To Invoke Reagan’s 11th Commandment | Says:

    [...]  I went back and reread what I had written about Rush’s comments on Sandra Fluke, last March. To be honest, I was not pleased with El Rushbo at the time -  mainly because what he had said was so imprudent. Most of us get it when he does his demonstrating absurdity by being absurd schtick. But during an election year, at a time when the left was on hyper-alert for any slip-ups on our side that would play into their idiotic “Republican War Against Women” narrative, it was inexcusably obtuse of him. Call this constructive criticism: [...]

  11. I Agree 100% – Time To Invoke Reagan's 11th Commandment | Tony Johnson Says:

    [...] I went back and reread what I had written about Rush’s comments on Sandra Fluke, last March. To be honest, I was not pleased with El Rushbo at the time – mainly because what he had said was so imprudent. Most of us get it when he does his demonstrating absurdity by being absurd schtick. But during an election year, at a time when the left was on hyper-alert for any slip-ups on our side that would play into their idiotic “Republican War Against Women” narrative, it was inexcusably obtuse of him. Call this constructive criticism: [...]

  12. I Agree 100% – Time To Invoke Reagan's 11th Commandment | 168ops.org Says:

    [...] I went back and reread what I had written about Rush’s comments on Sandra Fluke, last March. To be honest, I was not pleased with El Rushbo at the time – mainly because what he had said was so imprudent. Most of us get it when he does his demonstrating absurdity by being absurd schtick. But during an election year, at a time when the left was on hyper-alert for any slip-ups on our side that would play into their idiotic “Republican War Against Women” narrative, it was inexcusably obtuse of him. Call this constructive criticism: [...]

  13. Federal Appeals Court Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby – HHS Suddenly Sees The Light, Makes ‘Accommodation’ | Nice Deb Says:

    […] remind me what that whole “Republican War on Women” thing was about, last year. ‘Cause if I remember right, it had something to do Republicans objecting […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,586,981 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 507 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: