FIA Chief Caught In “Sadomasochistic Nazi Orgy”

This story out of the UK seems to making big headlines overseas. It involves the head of of the FIA, (International Automobile Federation) Max Mosley, who has apparently beclowned himself by taking part in a “sadomasochistic Nazi orgy” with five prostitutes that reportedly involved Nazi role-playing in a “torture chamber” in Chelsea.

Formula One’s governing body is keeping its distance from sexual allegations in a British tabloid newspaper about its president, Max Mosley.

“This is a matter between Mr. Mosley and the paper in question,” an International Automobile Federation (FIA) spokesman said.

EWWWW! This makes Spitzer look like a choirboy!:

The revelations are particularly damaging because Mr Mosley’s father, Oswald, was the pre-war leader of Britain’s fascist “blackshirts” who invited Adolf Hitler to his wedding.

Mr Mosley was said to have spoken in German and brandished a leather whip as he beat the women after allowing himself to be subjected to a humiliating inspection for lice. The News of the World said that Mr Mosley paid £2,500 cash for the prostitutes’ services.

The five-hour orgy ended with “the prostitutes drinking wine while Mr Mosley, 67, recovered his composure with a cup of tea”.

Ugh.

The revelations angered Jewish groups, who called for his resignation from one of the most powerful positions in world sport.

Motor racing insiders also questioned whether his position was tenable. The FIA does not simply administer Formula One but all other motor racing championships and even holds sway over road safety organisations such as the AA and RAC.

Video here. Warning!!!: not for the faint of heart…involves a lot of bending over and being spanked.

Kind of makes our country’s sex scandals look tame in comparison.

Hat tip: Crime Scene KC

Why Some Dems Are Nervous…

If Obama winds up being the nominee, as he almost certainly will be, Republicans will have a field day with ads like this one:

Get a load of this telling exhortation from My DD:

If we choose Obama as our nominee, we are locked-in to this narrative. There is no going back, no bogus NBC polls to save the day. No Anderson Cooper softball interviews or phony charges of racism that will rescue us.

You mean this guy is so bad, even the usual Democrat play-book election year shenanigans won’t help? Awww Shucky darns!
I love it when the mask slips, a little, don’t you?

Found via the News Bucket’s Top 10 Reasons The GOP Could Beclown Obama In November.

Hat tip: Hot Air headlines 

Outrageous! Dutch Dhimmis To Prosecute Wilders For Anti-Koran Film

You’ve got to be kidding me:

The Dutch prosecutor’s office is preparing to take legal action against the maker of an ‘anti-Koran’ film in an attempt to ease tensions over the film’s release, the Dutch foreign minister said on Monday. Maxime Verhagen told ambassadors from 26 Muslim (countries?) that he was happy with the relatively calm reaction he had witnessed since the short film was posted on sites Thursday by Dutch MP Geert Wilders, adding that the film in no way reflected the religious views of the Dutch government.

 Dr. Rusty Shackleford ofThe Jawa Report wants to know what the charge is going to be: “Failure to submit?”

I want to know: If you’re happy with the “relatively calm reaction” to the film…why throw the film maker under the bus?

UPDATE:

Allahpundit found some corroboration:

Radio Netherlands quotes the Dutch foreign minister as saying prosecutors are looking into it and the last line of this DPA report agrees. Scum:

The Dutch prosecutor’s office is preparing to take legal action against the maker of an ‘anti-Koran’ film in an attempt to ease tensions over the film’s release, the Dutch foreign minister said on Monday…

Although moderate Islamic groups have said the film is “nothing new” and have made appeals for Muslims to “react calmly and within the law,” the prospect of a backlash in the Islamic world remains a distinct possibility.

It’s BA-ACK

The New Black Panther Party is back on the Obama ’08 website, as of yesterday, with this ‘stirring’ endorsement:

Obama represents “positive change” for America and the World. Obama is capable of stirring the “melting pot” into a better “molten America”.

If you recall, it’s inclusion among other Obama supporting blogs at the community website caused a minor firestorm a couple of weeks ago, causing the embarrassed Obama campaign to remove it, while intimating that it was a hoax. (It wasn’t).

We’ll see how long it takes, this time.

UPDATE (2:18pm):

Annnnd it’s gone.

They’re getting quicker.

Hat tip: Aaron Klein, WND, who obviously has been keeping a close eye on this.

Scary Mugshot

If this picture doesn’t give you what Ace likes to call the “shivering douche-chills”, then I don’t know what will.

James Hart at Crime Scene KC wouldn’t even post it because he didn’t want to be responsible for any cases of hysterical blindness.

But here at Nice Deb, we don’t really have such admirable scruples, so there ya go.

I’m not even gonna tell you what he did…you can go to Crime Scene KC and read all about it if you really want to know. (It ain’t pretty).

Flashback: Obama 1995

I was doing some googling to see if I could find some info on Obama and the Million Man March he reportedly marched in and helped organize, and I found this interview of Obama in the Chicago Reader from December 1995, after he (yes!) attended the march. What stands out to me is his unapologetic love affair with collectivism. I guess that’s not surprising for a Democrat, but still…..wow! Here are some highlights:

John Wayne = Typical white guy:

“In America,” Obama says, “we have this strong bias toward individual action. You know, we idolize the John Wayne hero who comes in to correct things with both guns blazing. But individual actions, individual dreams, are not sufficient. We must unite in collective action, build collective institutions and organizations.”

Organize and mobilize more black churches:

In an interview after the class, Obama again spoke of the need to organize and mobilize the economic power and moral fervor of black churches. He also argued that as a state senator he might help bring this about faster than as a community organizer or civil rights lawyer.

The Christian right: intolerant, narrow-minded, falsely nostalgic:

“The right wing, the Christian right, has done a good job of building these organizations of accountability, much better than the left or progressive forces have. But it’s always easier to organize around intolerance, narrow-mindedness, and false nostalgia. And they also have hijacked the higher moral ground with this language of family values and moral responsibility.

It’s society’s job to teach children about the left’s version of morality:

“Now we have to take this same language–these same values that are encouraged within our families–of looking out for one another, of sharing, of sacrificing for each other–and apply them to a larger society. Let’s talk about creating a society, not just individual families, based on these values. Right now we have a society that talks about the irresponsibility of teens getting pregnant, not the irresponsibility of a society that fails to educate them to aspire for more.”

Obama goes to the Million Man March:

Obama took time off from attending campaign coffees to attend October’s Million Man March in Washington, D.C. His experiences there only reinforced his reasons for jumping into politics.

“What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society,” he said. “There was a profound sense that African-American men were ready to make a commitment to bring about change in our communities and lives.

“But what was lacking among march organizers was a positive agenda, a coherent agenda for change. Without this agenda a lot of this energy is going to dissipate. Just as holding hands and singing ‘We shall overcome’ is not going to do it, exhorting youth to have pride in their race, give up drugs and crime, is not going to do it if we can’t find jobs and futures for the 50 percent of black youth who are unemployed, underemployed, and full of bitterness and rage.

“Exhortations are not enough, nor are the notions that we can create a black economy within America that is hermetically sealed from the rest of the economy and seriously tackle the major issues confronting us,” Obama said.

Oh, here it comes…the “mean, cruel” Republicans:

We must deal with the forces that are depressing wages, lopping off people’s benefits right and left, and creating an earnings gap between CEOs and the lowest-paid worker that has risen in the last 20 years from a ratio of 10 to 1 to one of better than 100 to 1.

“This doesn’t suggest that the need to look inward emphasized by the march isn’t important, and that these African-American tribal affinities aren’t legitimate. These are mean, cruel times, exemplified by a ‘lock ‘em up, take no prisoners’ mentality that dominates the Republican-led Congress. Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing.”

White America doesn’t care? This is the real ‘post racial uniter’, folks.

UPDATE:

One thing that seemed positive (to me) about the Million Man March was that it asked men to take a pledge to eschew the sorts of pathologies that often plague black communities. (Click on link for Youtube video of Pledge).

But that seems to have left Obama cold:

“exhorting youth to have pride in their race, give up drugs and crime, is not going to do it” …

It seems to me that Obama’s main criticism of the Million Man March was that it didn’t offer the types of collectivist solutions “for change” that he was so into, (and still is).

Obama didn’t have anything to say about this Farrakhan interview from 1995, before the Million Man March:

RELATED!:

Via Gateway Pundit, we find a Huffpo writer enthralled with the similarities between Obama and some  20th century Marxist philosophers. Yes, you heard right…they’re not even trying to hide this stuff, anymore, brazen commies that they are:

Listening to Obama, I’m actually reminded of the writings of many mid-twentieth century Frankfurt school Marxist philosophers, particularly the work of Ernst Bloch and Theodero Adorno. In fact, Obama’s entire political ideology is thematic zed in the title of one of Bloch’s most profound volumes, The Principle of Hope. Bloch’s notion of hope as an indexation of what he called a politics of the “not-yet-here” resonates deeply with much of Obama’s rhetoric. We can hear the traces of this earlier Marxist tradition when Obama makes comments such as “hope…is all those men and women who are not content to settle on the world as it is, [but instead] who have the courage to remake the world as it should be.”

Read the rest at Gateway.

Posted in Dems, WOW!. 18 Comments »

Sunday Reading

Four Stumps In The Road For Obama, By Charles Lipson, RCP, on some of the major scandals that are going to plaguing Obama’s campaign from now until November. I liked his ending:

There are more questions than answers right now. But the questions are serious ones about character, judgment, and close personal associations. If the answers turn out to be damaging, this won’t be a Swift Boat. This will be a whole fleet.

Will McCain be willing to launch the fleet, or will it have to be done by surrogates?

Hat tip: Lucianne 

( I finally fed the beast, so I wouldn’t feel guilty about using her site so much)!

UK Bus Driver Kicks Passengers Off Bus…

So he can pray!

 The white Islamic convert rolled out his prayer mat in the aisle and knelt on the floor facing Mecca.

Passengers watched in amazement as he held out his palms towards the sky, bowed his head and began to chant.

One guy whipped out his cell phone to videotape the special moment from outside the bus. The video can be viewed at The Sun Online.

“Eventually everyone started complaining. One woman said, ‘What the hell are you doing? I’m going to be late for work’.”

After a few minutes the driver calmly got up, opened the doors and asked everyone back on board.

But when the already unnerved passengers saw the driver’s rucksack on the floor, they refused to get back on.

“One chap said, ‘I’m not getting on there now’.

 

“An elderly couple also looked really confused and worried.

“After seeing that no-one wanted to get on he drove off and we all waited until the next bus came about 20 minutes later. I was left totally stunned. It made me not want to get on a bus again.”

Perhaps they were being paranoid. But as one person said in the comment section:

“you cant fault anyone for not wanting to get back on after the rucksack came out – the London bombings are still very much with the general public and it is a legitimate concern that we all have to live with. The world IS a much different place post 9-11/7-7…”

Also, judging from the comments, people would very much like to see this bus driver “sacked“.

I totally agree.

Hat tip: Lucianne

 

Nice Deb Cuss-O-Meter

This is a little embarrassing…

The Blog-O-Cuss Meter - Do you cuss a lot in your blog or website?

…Considering the average cuss level is 9%, and Dustbury, the blog I stole this from only has a cuss level of 2.8%.

It’s not me…it’s my commenters…..*cough*

Well, lets see how I compare to Ace:

12.4% is all?!

There must be some mistake! I can’t be only .7% away from Ace?! *Face reddening*

Let’s see how I compare to The Hostages. There’s no one more filthy and dirty than that lot:

Cuss level high - 24.5% cuss level.

PHEW!

UPDATE:

Cranky’s very proud of his 14.4% rating, but he’s still working hard to raise his percentage.

Good lord, someone needs to wash Bmac’s mouth out with soap!

Just Pitiful.

Liveleak Pulls Fitna

It can still be viewed at different avenues on Google Video.

Michelle Malkin updated her site at 4:45 with this notice from Liveleak:

Following threats to our staff of a very serious nature, and some ill informed reports from certain corners of the British media that could directly lead to the harm of some of our staff, Liveleak.com has been left with no other choice but to remove Fitna from our servers.

This is a sad day for freedom of speech on the net but we have to place the safety and well being of our staff above all else. We would like to thank the thousands of people, from all backgrounds and religions, who gave us their support.

The Drawn Cutless says Liveleak has also been under a hacker attack.

Creeping Sharia questioned Liveleak’s dhimmi-like caveat in the posting of the video:

LiveLeaks’s Statement – “LiveLeak – Redefining Bias” Kudos to LiveLeak for allowing the posting of Fitna, but check out the dhimmi-like caveat: “LiveLeak.com has a strict stance on remaining unbiased…We in no way endorse Geert Wilders, his views, nor the views expressed within Fitna…some of the messages therein are personally offensive…”

So much for the self-proclamation of “unbiased”, and “maverick” as labeled by a WAPO dhimmi. Which of Geert’s 101 words did LiveLeak find offensive?

I wondered the same thing after having seen it. Was it just a CYA type pronouncement designed to placate the fanatics? Well, apparently it didn’t work.

The Jawa Report says in today’s world, thuggery does work.

Mark Steyn on All The News That’s Fitna.

UPDATE ( 3/29):

Outstanding! A Muslim Cleric makes Wilders’ point better than he ever could:

Omar Bakri, the Libyan-based radical Muslim cleric who is barred from Britain, did not think the film was very offensive. “On the contrary, if we leave out the first images and the sound of the page being torn, it could be a film by the [Islamist] Mujahideen,” he said. [...]

UPDATE: 

Well well well, what do you know?

Liveleak has had a change of heart.

Halo GONE

Forget the “Messiah” talk. Forget talk of a “tarnished halo”. That thing is gonekaput!

I think we can stop being intimidated by the holier than thou candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama. It turns out he is just your average, run-of-the-mill, lying, spinning, equivocating, making it up as he goes along, hypocritical, Democrat. And all the adulation from MSM hacks like Chris Matthews, and Keith Olbermann ain’t gonna hide that increasingly obvious truth.

Hypocritical:

The Reverend Wright controversy, (which the MSM has deluded itself into thinking Obama has successfully navigated past), has in fact seriously damaged his credibility with average Americans. A “post racial” person does not attend a race-baiting, demagogic church for nearly 20 years. Period. End of story.

Lying, Spinning, equivocating:

Drew at AOSHQ calls this the “audacity of bullshit”:

After telling the world he never heard any of the idiotic, racist comments Reverend Wright made and that he could not disown Wright anymore than he could disown his grandmother or the black community, Obama now says he was about to do just that.

Here’s Obama today on The View:

“Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn’t have felt comfortable staying at the church.”

So we’re to believe that Obama attended this church, and was a personal friend of reverend Wright for 20 years, but by golly….it’s a good thing the reverend retired….he was just getting ready to quit…… Does he really think we’re that stupid??? Not the bimbos on The View…not the koolaid drinkers on the left….the rest of us. What an egregious insult to our intelligence.

Average, run-of-the-mill, making it up as he goes along Democrat:

Hot Air:

Obama likes taxes except when he doesn’t:

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama went after the “We’re not paying enough taxes to the government” vote today during a television interview in New York.

First, he said the Bush tax cuts ought to die. He likes that top marginal rate of 39%. Although the non-partisan National Journal recently declared him the most liberal of the 100 senators, Obama denied being a “wild-eyed liberal,” which wasn’t what the Journal called him, but it sounds good on TV where everything moves by so quickly.

Maria Bartiromo on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” asked, “Who should pay more and who should pay less?” Predictably, the politician chose to talk about who would benefit from his higher tax plan, not who would get socked the hardest. But from his answers it sounds like the “wealthy” in his mind are those making more than $75,000.

“I would not increase taxes for middle class Americans and in fact I want to…. provide a tax cut for people who are making $75,000 a year or less,” he said. “For those folks, I want an offset on the payroll tax that would be worth as much as $1,000 for a family.

Bartiromo asked him why he thinks raising taxes in a slowing economy would be a good thing. After all, the Democrats plan to argue economics as the biggest issue this fall, blaming the Bush administration policies for a housing crisis that has investors already pulling back to safety positions. Hiking taxes in that environment would shrink investment capital even further, creating more momentum for recession. What was Obama’s response?

“Well, look,” said Obama, “there’s no doubt that anything I do is going to be premised on what the economic situation is when I take office.”

Ed Morrissey:

Obama wants it both ways. He wants the Left to believe that he will start pulling more money out of the economy for a big slate of government programs, while he wants the middle class to believe that all of these programs won’t cost them anything — and meanwhile, his options remain “open”. It sounds more like “I’m making this up as I go along.”

It’s called economic illiteracy.

More Lying:

Charles Krauthammer at NRO, has an excellent article out today about Obama’s shameless mischaracterization of McCain’s “100 years in Iraq” comment. When McCain was asked at a campaign stop in New Hampshire about possibly staying in Iraq for 50 years, John McCain interrupted:

“Make it a hundred” — then offered a precise analogy to what he envisioned: “We’ve been in Japan for 60 years. We’ve been in South Korea for 50 years or so.” Lest anyone think he was talking about prolonged war-fighting rather than maintaining a presence in postwar Iraq, he explained: “That would be fine with me, as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed.”

And lest anyone persist in thinking he was talking about war-fighting, he told his questioner: “It’s fine with me and I hope it would be fine with you if we maintained a presence in a very volatile part of the world.”

Now it’s very clear what he was talking about, here, and it’s the reasonable, sane, position to have on our presence in Iraq. Krauthammer drives this point home very well in his article. But the Obama campaign doesn’t want to talk about foreign policy in reasonable terms. They’ve found a really cool sound-bite and they’re running with it.

“It’s seldom you get such a clean shot,” a senior Obama adviser told the Politico:

“He (McCain) says that he is willing to send our troops into another 100 years of war in Iraq” (Barack Obama, Feb. 19).

“We are bogged down in a war that John McCain now suggests might go on for another 100 years” (Obama, Feb. 26).


What date between now and the election in November will he (McCain) drop this promise of a 100-year war in Iraq?” (Chris Matthews, March 4).

Why, even a CNN anchor (Rick Sanchez) buys it: “John McCain is telling us … that we need to win even if it takes 100 years” (March 16).

As Lenin is said to have said: “A lie told often enough becomes truth.” And as this lie passes into truth, the Democrats are ready to deploy it “as the linchpin of an effort to turn McCain’s national security credentials against him,” reports David Paul Kuhn of the Politico.

Behold:

Obama….typical, shameless, liberal pol for Democrat koolaid drinkers.

Friday Feel Good Story

Who doesn’t love a good, punk beat-down story?

Especially when the punk is trying to mug an 84 year old man. And the 84 year old is a former Marine:

Santa Rosa police Sgt. Steve Bair said that’s what happened around 2 p.m. in the 1600 block of Fourth Street. The elderly man was walking with a grocery bag in each arm when the boy approached him with a large knife, Bair said.

The boy said, “Old man, give me your wallet or I’ll cut you,” Bair said. The man told the boy he was a former Marine who fought in three wars and had been threatened with knives and bayonets, Bair said.

The man then put his bags on the ground and told the boy that if he stepped closer he would be sorry. When the boy stepped closer, the man kicked him in the groin, knocking him to the sidewalk, Bair said. The ex-Marine picked up his grocery bags and walked home, leaving the boy doubled over, Bair said.

The man reported the attempted robbery to police 45 minutes later.

The “boy” was described as 15 or 16 years old, and I’m guessing it will hurt for him to pee for awhile. I hope this little incident helps steer him away from a life of crime.

Hat tip: Crime Scene KC

Correction: This Local CBS affiliate says that the man was a retired Army paratrooper. You can watch his interview, here.

Related Story:

How lucky are we?! Two punk beat down story’s in one day! This time a trio of punks tries to rob a martial arts expert….with predictable results:

Three people who tried to rob a 42-year-old man in Bradenton early this morning may wish they had chosen a different target.

Two men and a woman approached a man in the parking lot of Health Care America, 3600 Cortez Road W., just after midnight, the Manatee County Sheriff’s Office said. The woman pointed a handgun at him and demanded his jewelry.

The man, who is a tae kwon do expert, pushed the gun away and kicked the woman in the face before fleeing across a street to a Shell gas station to call 911, deputies said.

YESSS!!!

Again, thanks to Crime Scene KC

John McCain/Mitt Romney

The ticket???

I could live with it:

In a show of Republican unity, one-time bitter foes John McCain and Mitt Romney raised money and campaigned together Thursday for a single goal – getting McCain elected president.

“We are united. Now our job is to energize our party,” the Arizona senator said in an airport hangar, flanked by Romney and Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., an early McCain supporter. Both have been mentioned as potential vice presidential picks, and McCain praised each.

Romney lauded McCain and promised to do all he can to help, saying: “He is a man who is proven and tested” and without question the right man to be president.

All of a sudden they’re best buds…it’s a sure sign, I’m thinking.

Posted in Repubs. 2 Comments »

Fitna

Allahpundit’s boss says to show some solidarity with the Dutch by embedding this video. So I’m happy to oblige. I’ve only had time to watch about five minutes of it so far, but it looks to be good.

Here is Geert Wilders’ own website.

Thanks to The Jawa Report for the link.

UPDATE:

Okay, now that I’ve had a chance to see it, I have to say…I saw nothing even remotely objectionable in this film. It merely speaks the truth. Jihadis don’t seem to be able to handle the truth. Too bad.

UPDATE:

Oops, how awkward…it seems Wilders has made a bit of a gaffe in editing his film.

UPDATE:

Here is the new version of Fitna, with the Westergaard Mohammad image replaced.

Here’s a good article from FrontPageMagazine on The Left and Fitna.

Coptic Priest Causes Islamic Clerics Heartburn…

When he’s not converting them to Christianity:

Meet Father Zakaria Botros, Islam’s public enemy #1:

Though he is little known in the West, Coptic priest Zakaria Botros — named Islam’s “Public Enemy #1” by the Arabic newspaper, al-Insan al-Jadid — has been making waves in the Islamic world. Along with fellow missionaries — mostly Muslim converts — he appears frequently on the Arabic channel al-Hayat (i.e., “Life TV”). There, he addresses controversial topics of theological significance — free from the censorship imposed by Islamic authorities or self-imposed through fear of the zealous mobs who fulminated against the infamous cartoons of Mohammed. Botros’s excurses on little-known but embarrassing aspects of Islamic law and tradition have become a thorn in the side of Islamic leaders throughout the Middle East.

Botros is an unusual figure onscreen: robed, with a huge cross around his neck, he sits with both the Koran and the Bible in easy reach. Egypt’s Copts — members of one of the oldest Christian communities in the Middle East — have in many respects come to personify the demeaning Islamic institution of “dhimmitude” (which demands submissiveness from non-Muslims, in accordance with Koran 9:29). But the fiery Botros does not submit, and minces no words. He has famously made of Islam “ten demands,” whose radical nature he uses to highlight Islam’s own radical demands on non-Muslims.

The result? Mass conversions to Christianity — if clandestine ones. The very public conversion of high-profile Italian journalist Magdi Allam — who was baptized by Pope Benedict in Rome on Saturday — is only the tip of the iceberg. Indeed, Islamic cleric Ahmad al-Qatani stated on al-Jazeera TV a while back that some six million Muslims convert to Christianity annually, many of them persuaded by Botros’s public ministry.

His M.O.? He broadcasts in Arabic, (enabling him to reach a broad audience through the new media). Muslims can ask questions about Islam without fear of reprisal, unprecedented in the Islamic world. And he uses a technique that has proven irrefutable:

Each of his episodes has a theme — from the pressing to the esoteric — often expressed as a question (e.g., “Is jihad an obligation for all Muslims?”; “Are women inferior to men in Islam?”; “Did Mohammed say that adulterous female monkeys should be stoned?” “Is drinking the urine of prophets salutary according to sharia?”). To answer the question, Botros meticulously quotes — always careful to give sources and reference numbers — from authoritative Islamic texts on the subject, starting from the Koran; then from the canonical sayings of the prophet — the Hadith; and finally from the words of prominent Muslim theologians past and present — the illustrious ulema.

Botros treats the question as open, and invites the ulema, (the revered articulators of sharia law) to respond.

More often than not, the response from the ulema is deafening silence — which has only made Botros and Life TV more enticing to Muslim viewers. The ulema who have publicly addressed Botros’s conclusions often find themselves forced to agree with him — which has led to some amusing (and embarrassing) moments on live Arabic TV.

Read the entire article for examples of some of these moments.

Incapable of rebutting Botros, the only strategy left to the ulema (aside from a rumored $5-million bounty on his head) is to ignore him. When his name is brought up, they dismiss him as a troublemaking liar who is backed by — who else? — international “Jewry.” They could easily refute his points, they insist, but will not deign to do so. That strategy may satisfy some Muslims, but others are demanding straightforward responses from the ulema.

Here’s a video I found on Youtube, no doubt made by some frustrated Jihadi jerkweed:

Just pitiful…….as DPUD would say… FAIL!

Kudos to this mighty Christian warrior. God speed Father Botros.

Hat tip: The Jawa Report

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,472,549 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 463 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: