Rep. Peter King, And Fox News’ Catherine Herridge Shred NY Times’ “Misleading” Benghazi Report (Video)

The New York Times fired its opening salvo for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign in the form of an investigative piece that in large part absolves  her and the Obama administration of the charge that they purposefully misled the public in the wake of the Benghazi attack. Written by David Kirkpatrick, (whom Daniel Greenfield once called “very slimy” in a FrontPageMagazine article), the piece is entitled,  A Deadly Mix in Benghazi, and claims that there was no al Qaeda link to the attack and it was fueled  by the anti-Mohammed video.

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.

It should be noted that Republicans have always claimed that Ansar al Sharia, the group behind the attack, was an “al Qaeda affiliate” or supporters of al Qaeda.

Fifteen months after Mr. Stevens’s death, the question of responsibility remains a searing issue in Washington, framed by two contradictory story lines.

One has it that the video, which was posted on YouTube, inspired spontaneous street protests that got out of hand. This version, based on early intelligence reports, was initially offered publicly by Susan E. Rice, who is now Mr. Obama’s national security adviser.

The other, favored by Republicans, holds that Mr. Stevens died in a carefully planned assault by Al Qaeda to mark the anniversary of its strike on the United States 11 years before. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of covering up evidence of Al Qaeda’s role to avoid undermining the president’s claim that the group has been decimated, in part because of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs.

Rep Peter King (R-NY), a member of the House Intelligence committee (and candidate for president in 2016) took issue with Kirkpatrick’s findings in an appearance on Fox News, Saturday afternoon..

“It’s clear that there was not adequate security”, he declared. “And it’s also clear that this was an organized, systematic attack with very skilled mortar operators –  this was no kind of mob at all. And  to the extent that a video was involved – it was really peripheral to the whole situation.  This was an organized attack by Ansar al Sharia which is an al Qaeda affiliate in actual practice.” He called the report “misleading” because it was “making a distinction without a difference.”

Catherine Herridge appeared on Fox News Saturday evening to share her insights. She also made mention of the five highly accurate mortars that were fired  on the CIA annex in less than a minute during the second wave of the attacks, noting that it “takes premeditation, it takes advanced planning, but more specifically – it takes training. And this would fly in the face – or at least contrast with the suggestion that this was just somehow spontaneous and a response to the anti-Islam video.”

SEE ALSO: 

Twitchy: New York Times finds no Al Qaeda link to Benghazi terror attack; ‘fueled in large part’ by video

Powerline: THE NEW YORK TIMES’ REVISIONIST ACCOUNT OF BENGHAZI:

The New York Times is out with a revisionist account of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. The Times says that in months of investigating, it “turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.” The Times also claims that the attack “was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

I suspect that the Times story tells us more about Hillary Clinton’s assessment of the threat Benghazi poses to her likely 2016 run for president than it does about what happened in Benghazi. But to the extent that the Times story is viewed as shedding a new, different light on the Benghazi, perhaps the House should hold new hearings on the attack.

The Times bases its claim that neither al Qaeda nor any other international terrorist group had a role in the attack on its view that Ansar al-Shariah is a “purely local extremist organization.” But Peter King, a member and former chairman of the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, points out that Ansar al-Shariah is widely believed to be an affiliate terror group of Al Qaeda. King accuses the Times of engaging in mere semantics, and he is probably right.

Linked by Doug Ross, thanks!

About these ads

11 Responses to “Rep. Peter King, And Fox News’ Catherine Herridge Shred NY Times’ “Misleading” Benghazi Report (Video)”

  1. December 29, 2013 Grumpy Daily Headlines | Grumpy Opinions Says:

    […] Video: Rep. Peter King Calls New York Times Piece On Benghazi “Misleading” […]

  2. Does The GOP Have A Strategy To Combat the Mediacracy in 2016? | Nice Deb Says:

    […]  should be obvious, the NY Times’s revisionist “bombshell” on Benghazi, is a preview of the Benghazi cover story the MSM will mount in defense of Hillary for the next […]

  3. From Nice Deb: Benghazi Witnesses Outraged By NYT’s Times Story: ‘Complete Baloney’ (Video) | a12iggymom's Blog Says:

    […] should be obvious, the NY Times’s revisionist “bombshell” on Benghazi, is a preview of the Benghazi cover story the MSM will mount in defense of Hillary for the next […]

  4. Hope n’ Change | americanmoxie.us Says:

    […] article, based on unnamed sources seemingly from Mars, blatantly ignores all of the evidence we already do know about the (ahem) WELL PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACK which took four American lives, left others gravely […]

  5. Geo Says:

    I’m shocked . . . . 0-0!

    Petey actually had time to deal with a real issue instead of going after Ted Cruz and the Tea Party? Has he been designated a Fox News Contributor yet? The only Congressman I know that does live shots from his own basement when he appears. . . . . regularly.

  6. Fox News: NYTs Benghazi Report 'Stirred Up A Hornets Nest', Witnesses Outraged Says:

    […] Peter King, a member of the House Intelligence Committee told Fox News, Saturday, “it’s clear that this was an organized, systematic attack with very skilled mortar operators […]

  7. Frappe Sipping Benghazi Terrorist Was Reportedly Offended By A Youtube Video | New York Daily Digest Says:

    […] Kirkpatrick, the reporter who wrote the widely derided “clear the decks for Hillary” piece in the New York Times, last December, resurrected the narrative that Ahmed Abu Khattalah, the […]

  8. Frappe Sipping Benghazi Terrorist Was Reportedly Offended By A Youtube Video | Los Angeles Daily Digest Says:

    […] Kirkpatrick, the reporter who wrote the widely derided “clear the decks for Hillary” piece in the New York Times, last December, resurrected the narrative that Ahmed Abu Khattala, the […]

  9. Frappe Sipping Benghazi Terrorist Was Reportedly Offended By A Youtube Video | Phoenix Daily Digest Says:

    […] Kirkpatrick, the reporter who wrote the widely derided “clear the decks for Hillary” piece in the New York Times, last December, resurrected the narrative that Ahmed Abu Khattala, the […]

  10. Frappe Sipping Benghazi Terrorist Was Reportedly Offended By A Youtube Video | Miami Daily Digest Says:

    […] Kirkpatrick, the reporter who wrote the widely derided “clear the decks for Hillary” piece in the New York Times, last December, resurrected the narrative that Ahmed Abu Khattala, the […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Blog Stats

    • 4,587,087 hits
  • free counters
  • Is your cat plotting to kill you?
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 507 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: