Catholic Military Chaplains Prevented From Reading Full Text of Archbishop Broglio’s letter at Masses

Archbishop Timothy Broglio

Archbishop Broglio’s letter to military personnel around the world was similar to the Bishops’ letters to the faithful in the US informing them of the unjust contraception mandate issued by the Department of Health and Human Services and proclaiming that we cannot and will not comply.  But his letter also contained a hard hitting line tailored especially for the military:  “It is a blow to a freedom that you have fought to defend and for which you have seen your buddies fall in battle,” He emailed his pastoral letter to  Catholic military chaplains on January 26,  with instructions that it be read at all masses in military chapels on the following Sunday.

Terrence Jeffrey of CNS News reports:

Archbishop Broglio’s letter minced no words in telling Catholics in the Armed Forces that the federal government was not only violating their constitutional rights through the new Obamacare regulation but was also violating the constitutional rights of all Catholics, while harming the freedom of religion generally.

“It is imperative that I call to your attention to an alarming and serious matter that negatively impacts the Church in the United directly, and that strikes at the fundamental right to religious liberty for all citizens of any faith,” wrote the archbishop.

“The federal government, which claims to be ‘of, by, and for the people,’ has just dealt a heavy blow to almost a quarter of those people—the Catholic population—and to the millions more who are served by the Catholic faith,” wrote the archbishop.

“It is a blow to a freedom that you have fought to defend and for which you have seen your buddies fall in battle,” said Archbishop Broglio.

The archbishop made clear that the regulation seeks to force not only Catholic institutions but also individuals, employers and insurers to provide and/or purchase immoral services.

“The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced last week that almost all employers, including Catholic employers, will be  forced to offer their employees’ health coverage the includes sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs, and contraception,” said Archbishop Broglio. “Almost all health insurers will be forced to include these immoral ‘services’ in the health policies they write. And almost all individuals will be forced to buy that coverage as a part of their policies.”

Archbishop Broglio declared that the Administration’s regulation was an “unjust law” and warned that Catholics would resist it.

“In so ruling,” he wrote, “the Administration has cast aside the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, denying Catholics our Nation’s first and most fundamental freedom, that of religious liberty.

“And, as a result, unless the rule is overturned, we Catholics will be compelled to choose between violating our consciences or dropping health care coverage for our employees (and suffering the penalties for doing so),” said the archbishop.

“We cannot—and will not—comply with this unjust law,” he wrote.

Full text of the letter, here.

“The Army’s Office of the Chief of Chaplains subsequently sent an email to senior chaplains advising them that the Archbishop’s letter was not coordinated with that office and asked that it not be read from the pulpit,” said the archdiocese’s statement. “The Chief’s office directed that the letter was to be mentioned in the Mass announcements and distributed in printed form in the back of the chapel.”

On Saturday, Jan. 28, after the Army’s Office of the Chief of Chaplains issued this directive, Archbishop Broglio spoke with Secretary of the Army John McHugh, a political appointee of President Barack Obama.

Archbishop Broglio’s position was that, in trying to stop Catholic Army chaplains from reading his pastoral letter, the Army was violating his First Amendment rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion and the First Amendment rights of Catholic chaplains and Catholic service members.

“Archbishop Broglio and the Archdiocese stand firm in the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army constituted a violation of his Constitutionally-protected right of free speech and the free exercise of religion, as well as those same rights of all military chaplains and their congregants,” said the statement from the archdiocese.

In his Jan. 28 telephone conversation with Army Secretary McHugh, Archbishop Broglio was able to extract from the secretary an admission that it had been wrong for the secretary to try to silence the Catholic chaplains. The archbishop decided that the line in his letter that said Catholics cannot and will not comply with the “unjust law” of the HHS regulation would not be read aloud in Catholic Masses by the chaplains, but that the rest of the letter would.

The line stating “we will not … comply with this unjust law” did remain, however, in the printed letter that was distributed at Masses said by Army chaplains and it remains in the copies of the letter posted on the website of the Archdiocese for the Military.

Vatican Insider reported:

Many political commentators in the USA believe this controversial policy could cost Obama dearly at the next election, unless he reverses it before then.

“The fallout is cataclysmic for the White House and President Obama”, Mark Shields, a syndicated columnist, and David Brooks, a New York Times writer, said on a Public Broadcasting Service program last week.

Brooks recalled that Obama gained 54% of the Catholic vote in the 2008 election, but risks losing much of that support next November because of this policy.  He argued that Government should give people with different values the possibilities to operate as they see fit. “A Government that says ‘one size fits all’, and ‘you’ve got to do it our way or not all’, is a Government that insults a lot of people”, he stated.

Obama  has stirred up a hornets nest. It remains to be seen how badly he will get stung on election day.


LifeNews: New Mandate May Drive Obama’s Top Catholic Defender Away


Catholic politicos should know of whom we refer:

The new Obamacare mandate the pro-abortion president put in place may be driving away his top Catholic supporter, Douglas Kmiec, the former Malta ambassador who upsets pro-life advocates with his support.

Kmiec has indicated he may not support Obama this time around because of the new mandate, which forces religious employers to pay for insurance coverage including birth control and drugs that can cause abortions. It has been condemned by virtually every Catholic bishop in the nation.

Hey Kmiec – does Obama still sound more Catholic than most Catholics you know?


Newsbusters: CNN’s Crowley Brings Up Catholic Uproar; Gov. O’Malley Dismisses Bishops as a Gaggle of Republicans

Wish that was my impression of the Bishops.

Donohue Says 70 Million Of His Voters Ready To Alter Presidential Election

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Catholic leaders upped the ante Monday, threatening to challenge the Obama administration over a provision of the new health care law that would require all employers, including religious institutions, to pay for birth control.

“This is going to be fought out with lawsuits, with court decisions, and, dare I say it, maybe even in the streets,” Donohue said.

Hat tip: Weasel Zippers.

Linked by Michelle Malkin, thanks!

Mitt’s Big Guns Now Trained On Santorum

Newt can take a breather. Now that Santorum is rising in the polls, (leading Mitt in MN, and the only candidate beating Obama in a head to head match-up), Romney is aiming his fire at Rick Santorum’s weak spots. There are a few, and Santorum is going to have to know how to respond without sounding whiny and defensive if he wants to retain his slim lead in Minnesota.

The Weekly Standard reports:

In a Sunday press release slugged RICK SANTORUM: PROUD DEFENDER OF EARMARKS AND PORK-BARREL SPENDING,” the Romney oppo shop dumped a list of 18 news items (dating back to 2003) trying to paint Santorum as a free spendin’, Big Government-lovin’, flip-flopper.


Update (9:47 a.m.): Two more Romney attacks on Santorum have gone out this morning. The first is a “Summary of Santorum’s False Attacks on Massachusettes Health Care” (Romneycare worked great and is nothing like Obamacare!) and the second is a notice that the Romney campaign has scheduled its first conference call with the press to attack Santorum–at noon today Tim Pawlenty will talk about “Santorum’s Long History of Pork-Barrel Spending.”

Santorum is also leading in Missouri, ahead of its toothless primary, this Tuesday, but a big win could add to his momentum:

According to Katrina Trinko at NRO, Missouri is Santorum’s last stand:

If Santorum does win Missouri, the challenge will be for him to present it as a meaningful win. The reason the primary has nothing to do with choosing delegates is that in 2010 the Republican National Committee required certain states, including Missouri, not to select their delegates before March. Last year the Republican legislature passed a bill that would have moved the primary from February to March, but Democratic governor Jay Nixon vetoed it (not because of the primary-date switch, he said, but because of other provisions in the bill).

So the party switched to caucuses, which do not require legislative sanction, and scheduled them for March. But a bill to eliminate the February primary failed on a tie vote, and the result was that Missouri taxpayers are being forced to fund a $7 million election that is essentially a state-run opinion poll.

Missouri politicos doubt that the caucus results will mirror the primary results, or that there will even be any attempt to make them do so. Six weeks is an eon in this primary cycle, and some of the candidates may have dropped out by then. Even if they all remain in the race, the fact that caucusgoers can support Gingrich is sure to affect the final results.

But for Santorum, struggling to make the case that he’s a more viable not-Romney candidate than Gingrich, Missouri still offers a valuable opportunity.

“When we go head to head with Governor Romney, we can beat him,” Santorum said in Missouri on Friday, according to NBC News. “When Speaker Gingrich goes head to head with Governor Romney, he can’t.”

“The polls show it,” Santorum added, “and it will show on Tuesday.”


The Other McCain: Ed Morrissey, Phyllis Schlafly, Michelle Malkin, David Limbaugh, Tom Tancredo: Gosh, Everybody’s for Santorum Now!

Santorum will speak Friday morning at CPAC, and his supporters are hoping to get a big boost as the campaign moves forward, with the next debate (Feb. 22 in Arizona) still two weeks away. Finally, while this isn’t quite an angel-wings endorsement, Dan Blatt of Gay Patriot offers some words of respect for Santorum:

Maybe Santorum is doing well because he comes across as a nice guy. He enjoyed that reputation when he served on Capitol Hill.  Although, to be sure, the Senator has said some strange things about gays, he has treated the one member of his staff who has been publicly “outed” as gay with dignity. Indeed, his one-time spokesman Robert Traynham said “was open with Santorum about his sexual orientation” and that he had “never heard Santorum voice an anti-gay or bigoted comment” in the ten years he had worked for him.

Many people disagree with Santorum on issues, but still respect his sincerity and consistency and, like a lot of other Republicans, Dan was disgusted by Newt’s Nevada meltdown.

So we await further developments and who knows? By this time next week, the headlines may be all about the latest Santorum Surge. There was another earthquake in Vanuatu last week. I’m just sayin’ . . .

Michelle Malkin: Santorum’s got game:

The conventional wisdom tells us Mitt and Newt are the only choices in this race. But these most recent polls clearly suggest that Santorum, not Newt, is the strongest conservative alternative. I’ve carefully and candidly laid out the strengths, weaknesses, and best arguments for Santorum. I’m working in my home state of Colorado to spread the message. Ed Morrissey makes his case for Santorum to his fellow Minnesotans and the Right at Hot Air. David Limbaugh did last week. More support from the Right spotlighted here by Stacy McCain.

Is it a long shot? Yes. Is it doable? Yes. There are no inevitabilities in politics.

Santorum’s got game. Strong showings in Missouri, Minnesota, and Colorado could bring the fundraising boost he needs. You can help right now right here.

Freedom’s Lighthouse: Rick Santorum Looks to Missouri Primary to Show what He can do Head-to-Head against Mitt Romney – Video 2/5/12

Linked by The Other McCain, and Doug Ross, thanks!


Video: Rick Santorum on American Exceptionalism

In this clip from Rick Santorum’s speech in Lee’s Summit, Mo, Friday night, he talks about what distinguishes America from all other nations. Which founding document is directly related to  American exceptionalism?


Video: Santorum Explains Why He’s The Best Candidate To Beat Obama

Video: Santorum on Birth Control Mandate: The Bishops “Got What They Deserved”

Video: Santorum in Lee’s Summit, MO: “Barack Obama Believes You Are Incapable of Handling Freedom”

Santorum Swings Through Lee’s Summit, MO – UPDATED with Video UPDATE II: Santorum Leads Obama in Rasmussen Poll!