Saturday Movie Matinee: Benghazi-Gate

Fox News Confirms Terrorist Cover-up By The Obama Administration in First 24 Hours:

Hyscience: Must-Watch Video: Bret Baier’s Report With Extensive Time Line On Obama’s Two Weeks of Benghazi-Gate

Sean Hannity: Obama Regime’s Benghazi Lies:

CNN: Sources: No FBI agents in Benghazi:

Rush Limbaugh on Today Show’s covering for Barack Obama’s week-long lies on Libya debacle:

Gateway Pundit: Top Republican: Ambassador Rice Should Resign for Misleading Public on Benghazi Terror Attacks (Video):

Rep. Peter King told CNN Ambassador Susan Rice should resign for what he says was misleading comments about the Libya attack.

Huckabee: Obama In Denial Of Holy War:

Paul Ryan on Cavuto: This is Not What a Real Recovery Looks Like – Fox News 9/28/2012:

***

Another great video by Bullet People, (especially because ND is featured this time!):

The Republican Jewish Coalition presents “Perilous Times,” a mini-documentary in which Israeli experts and everyday citizens candidly discuss their concerns about the U.S.-Israel relationship under  Obama.

Among the notable experts consulted for this film are :
• Zalman Shoval, former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. and a highly-respected diplomat;
• Oren Kessler, foreign affairs correspondent at the Jerusalem Post;
• Barry Rubin, an expert on terrorism and Middle East affairs;
• Jacob Levy, Israel’s leading pollster and founder of Gallup Israel;
• Itamar Marcus, founder and director of Palestinian Media Watch; and
• Yair Shamir, leading Israeli businessman; former chair of El Al and Israel Aerospace; son of former PM Yitzhak Shamir.

Granny Jan and Jihad Kitty: Obama has been living on Easy St but come Nov he can kiss the good life goodbye:

http://www.amazon.com/Presidential-Perks-Gone-Royal-Re-election/dp/0974810355

PJTV: Terrorists Winning? Ivy League Professor Calls for Censorship of YouTube:

No Description Columbia law professor Tim Wu thinks YouTube should censor videos that could offend people in the Middle East. Is the liberal establishment raising the white flag to Islamic extremists? Are academics willing to sacrifice free speech and the First Amendment to satisfy the demands of radical Muslim terrorists? Find out.

Netanyahu Brings Visual Aid “Bomb Drawing” To UN General Assembly Speech:

 

Yid With Lid reported:

That Wiley Coyote prop was insurance. Bibi drew the red line right under the 90% and made a reasonable case.  Now everyone knows HIS red line, including Iran. Even if Obama didn’t like the bomb, his campaign will undoubtedly use the Prime Minister’s words for his next ads in Florida (don’t worry fellow Republicans it wont work–more people will remember Obama picked Whoopie Goldberg over Bibi).

What is most important is that Netanyahu gave a detailed explanation of his position before Obama could do the same with his. If his talks with Obama break down, or (God forbid!) if Obama wins a second term and puts the screws on Israel, Bibi has outlined the point of no return AND the timing to the American people.  That was the brilliance of what the Israeli PM did today.  If Obama does not come through and Israel has to act on her own, that cartoonish picture will be remembered by the American People as the rationale for acting. His simple and reasonable presentation will move Americans to ask why Obama is not backing Israel in what seems to be a fair demand.

Obama Addresses the UN General Assembly:

Charles Krauthammer:Obama’s cringe-worthy platitudes in U.N.

In mid-September 2008, Lehman Brothers collapsed and the bottom fell out of the financial system. Barack Obama handled it coolly. John McCain did not. Obama won the presidency. (Given the country’s condition, he would have won anyway. But this sealed it.)

Four years later, mid-September 2012, the U.S. mission in Benghazi went up in flames, as did Obama’s entire Middle East policy of apology and accommodation. Obama once again played it cool, effectively ignoring the attack and the regionwide American humiliation. “Bumps in the road,” he said. Nodding tamely were the mainstream media, who would have rained a week of vitriol on Mitt Romney had he so casually dismissed the murder of a U.S. ambassador, the raising of the black Salafist flag over four U.S. embassies and the epidemic of virulent anti-American demonstrations from Tunisia to Sri Lanka (!) to Indonesia.

Obama seems not even to understand what happened. He responded with a groveling address to the U.N. General Assembly that contained no less than six denunciations of a crackpot video, while offering cringe-worthy platitudes about the need for governments to live up to the ideals of the U.N.

The U.N. being an institution of surpassing cynicism and mendacity, the speech was so naive it would have made a fine middle-school commencement address. Instead, it was a plaintive plea by the world’s alleged superpower to be treated nicely by a roomful of the most corrupt, repressive, tin-pot regimes on earth.

Read on as Charles hammers Romney for his missed opportunities in all this.

Romney has accumulated tons of cash for 30-second ads. But unless they’re placed on the scaffolding of serious speeches making the larger argument, they will be treated as nothing more than tit for tat.

Make the case. Go large. About a foreign policy in ruins. About an archaic, 20th-century welfare state model that guarantees 21st-century insolvency. And about an alternate vision of an unapologetically assertive America abroad unafraid of fundamental structural change at home.

It might just work. And it’s not too late.

Via AIM: Pat Caddell’ speech at “The Audacity of Corruption” media conference 9/21/2012:

But I want to talk about this Libyan thing, because we crossed some lines here.  It’s not about politics.  When the—if any President of the United States—First of all we’ve had nine day of lies over what happened because they can’t dare say it’s a terrorist attack, and the press won’t push this. Yesterday there was not a single piece in The New York Times over the question of Libya.  Twenty Americans embassies, yesterday, are under attack.  None of that is on the national news.  None of it is being pressed in the papers.  If a President of either party—I don’t care whether it was Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton or George Bush or Ronald Reagan or George H. W. Bush—had a terrorist incident, and got on an airplane after saying something, and flown off to a fundraiser in Las Vegas, they would have been crucified!  It would have been—it should have been the equivalent, for Barack Obama, of George Bush’s “flying over Katrina” moment.  But nothing was said at all, and nothing will be said.

It is one thing to bias the news, or have a biased view.  It is another thing to specifically decide that you will not tell the American people information they have a right to know…