Jay Carney took not a single question at his press briefing, Monday, pertaining to CNN’s blockbuster story about CIA intimidation of Benghazi witnesses. Not a single question. Not even the CNN reporter questioned him about it.
Apparently, reporters are fearful that pushing the story will cost them White House access: Perhaps the White House has issued its own Stream of Threatening Chatter.
Some CNN reporters are reportedly fearful now that their access to the White House will be hampered following their probing into a story that members of the Obama administration would prefer remain uninvestigated.“Access is a very serious consideration when it comes to stories that could adversely impact a show, correspondent, or network’s relationship with the administration, a campaign, or any political leader,” one source with insider information told Mediaite.
Nobody considers suppressing stories by denying access a scandal in and of itself?
The stench of this corrupt Regime, its willing allies in the media, and the AWOL Republicans has becoming suffocating.
I mean look at this – a few days ago, the indispensable Keith Koffler tallied the number of real Obama scandals plaguing the country to 24 and counting.
President Obama claims that Republicans are busy probing “phony scandals.” But the sheer number of scandals suggests that misbehavior, abuse of power, and possibly corruption are not something being dreamed up by the GOP, but a defining characteristic of the Obama administration.
The number has grown since then. Now we have Obama Wastes Hundreds of Millions on “Worker Training” and Obama’s Utterly Corrupt, unilateral Rewriting of ObamaCare to benefit Congressmen and their staffers.
This guy just keeps ignoring the law and the Constitution, and apparently nobody seems to care.
It’s getting to the point where a massive act of civil disobedience seems to be our only remedy. We can’t use the courts because we will be denied standing. We can’t petition Congress because they are the ones benefiting from this. What choice do we have, other than to say: if you won’t obey the law, why should we?
Of course, the reason is: if we don’t obey the law, they will point guns at us and make us go to jail. If they don’t obey the law, they’ll just rewrite it so the law says what they want it to say.
Oh, and fresh off the presses: Exclusive: U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans:
A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin – not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.
When does it end?
Obama could publicly declare himself Dictator for life and the Republicans would do nothing more than give some impassioned speeches and then maybe hold him in Contempt of Congress, and that would be it, because any response stronger than that could get them branded as racists and we can’t have that. . And then in two years they’ll try to retake the Senate by running as the anti-Dictatorship party, but they’ll lose because we’ll be living under a friggin’ dictatorship and the elections will be rigged.
People are alarmed and getting desperate. The scandals are horrifying and Washington doesn’t seem to be listening.
Tomorrow, during rush hour traffic, conservative activists from all across the nation will be manning overpasses with Impeach Obama banners. See the Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment facebook page for details.
It’s a cry for help.
Tea Party Nation goes there, Is Obama ‘Wagging the Dog?’
Is Barack Obama using the diversionary tactic known as Wag the Dog in order to justify his massively unconstitutional spying on ALL American citizens? Are the closing of 21 foreign embassies in 17 countries because of real threats, or are they contrived by a corrupt regime in order to communicate the message, “See, we’ve uncovered all these terrorist attacks with NSA spying programs that we wouldn’t have otherwise known about. You don’t want to blow up do you? Don’t you want to be safe? If we stop spying on you, then terrorist attacks like the ones that were going to happen at foreign embassies would be left unchecked.”
Am I accusing Obama of wagging the dog in regards to closing the Mid-east embassies? Am I saying that the threats aren’t real? Am I saying that the President of the United States would purposely lie about a terrorist attack (or in this case, a proposed one) for strictly political purposes? I’m simply posing a question.
Oh that’s just wingnut crazy talk….
Yeah, you know what was crazy? Funneling guns to drug cartels in Mexico and blaming it on one ATF office in Phoenix.
You know what else was crazy? Blaming the Benghazi attack on a YouTube video.
You know what else was crazy? Blaming the IRS targeting on one IRS office in Cincinnati.
You know what else is crazy? Believing anything this Regime puts out at face value.
We’ve reached critical mass. The Regime has 0 credibility with Americans who pay attention. People don’t trust their government and don’t know what to believe.
Linked by Doug Ross, thanks!